Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: shops and commercial establishments act 1961 chapter 1 preliminary Court: allahabad Page 5 of about 52 results (2.665 seconds)

Metal Craft Vs. Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2001(3)AWC2067; (1999)3UPLBEC1689

..... -sellers ; (ii) to provide for the verification of accurate weights and scales and see that the producer-seller is not denied hislegitimate due ; (iii) to establish market committees in which the agricultural producer will have his due representation ; (iv) to ensure that the agricultural producer has his say in the utilisation of market ..... : the body of persons concerned with buying and selling a particular class of goods ; a region or outlet for successful trading.black's law dictionary :place of commercial activity in which goods, commodities, securities, services etc, are bought and sold.oxford dictionary :(1) the meeting together of people for the purchase and sale of ..... and this activity must be carried out on a large scale. inspite of the security constraints, the jewellers also expose and exhibit their goods in their shop in a market. an agreement can be arrived at between two partiesby letters or telecommunication messages and this can be done easily while sitting at home in .....

U.P. Chalchitra Nigam Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1991(62)FLR24]; (1995)IIILLJ723All; (1991)1UPLBEC163

..... the counter affidavit that the members of the petitioners union are either booking clerks or operators, gate keepers, chowkidars, sweepers or cinema managers, who, as part of the establishment of the nigam had themselves been running the cinema houses and the allegations made in the petition that the nigam did not part with the management and kept the petitioners ..... 1.22. lakhs to the employees of the nigam on 31.3.1990.'35. with regard to the availability of finances in the account of the nigam in the united commercial bank, naka hindola branch, lucknow, the opposite parties state as under:'11(i). that the state government by the g.o. dated 26.3. 1990 decided to sanction ..... (1) llj 274 laid down as under:'but it is one thing to affirm the jurisdiction, another to authorise its free exercise like a bull in a china shop. this court has spelt out wise and clear restraints on the use of this extraordinary remedy and the high courts will not go beyond those wholesome inhibitions except where .....

Raj NaraIn Vs. Smt. Indira Gandhi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1972All41

..... thereunder nor incompatible with the scheme of the act or the spirit of the law governing election petitions; that the english common law rule forbidding discovery in actions to establish a forfeiture or to enforce a penalty does not apply to an election petition and in any case cannot be invoked in india; and that the mere fact that ..... oath that the discovery will tend to criminate him or expose him to a penalty.'the contention is that an election petition must be treated as an action 'to establish a forfeiture or enforce a penalty', because it may lead to the forfeiture of the respondent's seat in parliament and to the penalty of disqualification under sections ..... all relate to actions for the recovery of pecuniary penalties from the defendants; while earl of maxborqugh v. whitewood urban district council. (1897-2 qb 111) and seddon v. commercial salt co. ltd., (1925-1 ch 187) relate to actions for enforcing the forefeiture of a lease. no case has been brought to my notice in which the rule .....

Dr. Dinesh Sharma Vs. Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(1)AWC973

..... . mohd. nooh 1958 scr 595;(3) sushil kumar mehta v. govind ram bohra ;(4) calcutta discount company ltd. v. income tax officer and anr. 1961 scr 241 ;(5) east india commercial co. ltd. calcutta and ors. v. collector of customs, calcutta and anr. ;(6) lady dinbal dinshaw petit and ors. v. domination of india and anr. ;(7) karnal improvement trust, karnal .....

Brij Kishore Verma Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

..... and "administrative functions" as distinguished from "judicial or quasi judicial functions" and hence prohibition would not lie to restrain administrator from enforcing maximum rent established by him pursuant to emergency housing rent control law, particularly where regulation as to maximum rent had already been adopted and promulgated. mck. unconsol. laws ..... in decision making are more specific, relating to particular individuals or situation, in which case decision is administrative; court also considers whether action involves establishment of a general policy, and so is legislative, or whether action singles out specifiable individuals and affects them differently from others, and so ..... sc 1539 andhra industrial works vs. chief controller of imports and others; 1990 supplementary scc 440: gonendra kumar maheshwari. vs. union of india; chief commercial manager, south central railway, secunderabad and ors. v. g. ratnam and ors., (2007) 8 scc 212. 47. however, the facts, circumstances and .....

Smt. Shahnaz HussaIn Wife of Late Shri Nasir Hussian Vs. State of U.P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(227)ELT61(All)

..... 30 and not chapter 33 of the tariff act 1985, holding the same to be ayurvedic medicines and not cosmetics. similar remained the case regarding the other establishments in noida, wherein the classification was approved under chapter 30 of the tariff act 1985 by the assistant commissioner provisionally vide order dated 01.09.1994 and ..... the authority, after adjudicating the matter, i.e. commissioner of central excise (adjudication), on 07.08.1998 passed the following order:(1) as the facts establish that duty was evaded by willful mis-statement and suppression of facts i upheld invokation of the extended period of limitation in terms of the proviso to section ..... commissioner of income tax v. vasudeo v. dempo 1993 supp (1) scc 612; cce v. jagat dalal (p) ltd. : 1996(88)elt638(sc) ; bengal iron corporation and anr. v. commercial tax officer and ors. : 1993(66)elt13(sc) ; ranadey micronutrients v. cce : 1996(87)elt19(sc) ; poulose & mathan v. cce : 1997(90)elt264(sc) ; british machinery supplies .....

M/S. Uniword Telecom Ltd. and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... banks, the banks and financial institutions in india do not have power to take possession of securities and sell them. our existing legal framework relating to commercial transactions has not kept pace with the changing commercial practices and financial sector reforms. this has resulted in slow pace of recovery of defaulting loans and mounting levels of non-performing assets of banks and .....

A.R.C. Overseas Private Limited Vs. Bougainvillea Multiplex and Entert ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1212

..... was obtained personally against him in any other independent proceedings. konda lakshmana bapuji v. government of andhra pradesh and ors. : [2002]1scr651 . has been refered to establish what are the ingredients to construe 'land grabbing' being similar to 'house grabbing'. he also cited a judgment in lallu yeshwant singh (dead) by his legal representative v ..... 5. mr. shashi nandan, learned senior counsel appearing for the defendants-respondents, contended that right to occupy the premises as per the agreement is conditional for specific commercial purpose to operate a chinese cuisine restaurant under the name and style of 'yo china'. since the right of such franchise had been withdrawn, termination of occupancy ..... they were threatened by the representative/s of the respondents to remove from the occupation and in the appeal the specific grievance is that boards of the shop were removed in the night of 4/5.8.2006, a notice of termination of occupancy right was issued to them on 5.8.2006 and .....

Divisional Superintendent, Northern Railway and anr. Vs. R.B. Hanifi

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1977)ILLJ309All

..... an asstt, traffic superintendent prior to 2nd december, 1957. his services were terminated by serving on him one month's notice under rule 18 contained in indian railway establishment code. he filed an appeal to the general manager but he was informed that his appeal was incompetent. in june, 1959 he was offered re-employment as ..... lawful justification.49. the other cases relied upon by him are, union of india v. n.r. venkataraman naidu (1975) 2 s.l.r. 353 (mad), tami kumar v. chief commercial superintendent : air1965cal75 , hari raj singh v. sanchalak panchayat raj, u.p. government, lucknow : (1968)illj407all , union of india v. t.l. dakshina murti : air1975mad337 , t. gopinath ..... 1959 and was reinstated on 4-7-1961, hence there was no question of any arrears of salary having become barred by limitation. in tarni kumar v. chief commercial super intendent (supra) the employee was suspended on 4-5-1956 and was dismissed ob 29-7-1959 on account of his being convicted in a criminal case .....

Asok Pande Vs. Union of India

Court : Allahabad

..... property of the executive and judicial circumspection keeps the court lock-jawed save where the power has been polluted with oblique ends or is otherwise void on well-established grounds. the constitutional balance cannot be upset." (31) the settled legal position is that it is only the decision-making process and not the decision ..... . mahajan v. jalgaon municipal council, (1991) 3 scc 81, the municipal council entered into an agreement with a private builder for the construction of a commercial complex. the project envisaged a self-financing scheme through which the builder was to construct the complex at his own cost but after completion of construction was to ..... hand over the complex to the council. however, he was allowed to dispose of certain shops by retaining premium received therefrom by way of reimbursement of costs and profits. the action of the council was challenged as ''unconventional' and arbitrary. negating the .....