Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: seeds act 1966 Sorted by: old Page 5 of about 575,937 results (0.301 seconds)

Shamsundar Agrawal Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2007CriLJ749

..... it is not the intention of the law, as is obvious from section 21 of the seeds act, 1966, that every director, manager, secretary or officer of the company shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence, unless it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable ..... for retest, on 15-10-2003, the complainant non-petitioner filed a complaint under section 7(b) of the seeds act, 1966, read with sections 3/7 of the essential commodities act, 1955 before the trial court. ..... per seeds act, 1966 under section 15 and seeds ..... section 21 of the seeds act, 1966 which reads as follows:21 ..... seeds act, 1966 ..... the company requested the complainant non-petitioner for getting the seeds' samples re-tested in the central seeds testing laboratory but the request was not considered and, in violation of the provisions of the seeds act, the learned trial court took cognizance illegally against the petitioner it is submitted that the company has been supplying the seeds to the farmers all over india for years together but ..... submitted that it should be presumed that being the deputy managing director the petitioner was in-charge of the affairs of the company for the purpose of section 21 of the act and, in case it is presumed that the alleged offence is committed with consent or connivance or on account of neglect, as contemplated by sub-section (2) of section 21 of the seeds act, it cannot be said that there is no sufficient ground to proceed against the petitioner.14. .....

Pankaj Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC684

..... vide para 9 of the writ petition, it is claimed that the petitioner (pankaj tiwari) obtained licence under the seeds act, 1966 for running a processing plant. ..... the applicant to disclose the place for storage and the place of sale which means that the concerned authority must have knowledge of full facts regarding place of business for purchases and sale of seeds to be monitored in such a manner as to ensure the maintenance of quality of seeds which is necessary and essential for obtaining the object of the seeds act.8. ..... under clause 7 of the said form a there is a note which reads 'where the business of selling/exporting/importing seeds is intended to be carried on at more than one place, a separate licence should be obtained for each such place ..... the petitioner namely that the government notification dated 4.7.1985 stood revoked after the government notification dated 7.12.1995 came into force, the same will create problem and inconvenience to large number of those seed dealers who may be interested to carry on business within one district alone. ..... carry on business) of food grains, dalhan, tilhan, all vegetable seeds and fodder seeds within the district of varanasi. ..... case a person wants licence as dealer of seeds under the aforesaid order with respect to more than one district in a state or for the entire state, then in that case, the competent authority to grant such licence, as per the government order dated 7.12.1995, is the joint director agriculture (seeds and farms) u. p. .....

Shakthi Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commnr. (Ct) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2007(9)SC288; 2007(8)SCALE431; (2007)6SCC176; (2007)7VST769(SC)

..... seeds' is defined in section 9 of the seeds act, 1966 (in short the 'seeds act ..... or label shall be responsible for the accuracy of the information required to appear on the mark or label so long as seed is contained in the unopened original container:provided, however, that such person shall not be responsible for the accuracy of the statement appearing on the mark or label if the seed is removed from the original unopened container, or he shall not be responsible for the accuracy of the germination statement beyond the ..... no 604 dated 9.4.1981, the claimant should establish and prove that the seeds in question are certified seeds as well as truthfully labelled seeds and that the appellant-dealer has failed to adduce any satisfactory material and evidence to establish these two conditions for ..... the appellant had clarified its stand as follows:in this regard, we would like to bring to your kind notice, that we have purchased processed chilli seed, paddy seed and sunflower seed from farmers, and not chillies, paddy or sunflower commodities. ..... act 6 of 1957) the governor of andhra pradesh hereby exempts from the tax payable under the said act the sales or purchases of all varieties of certified and truthfully labelled seeds for agricultural purposes.sales of certified and truthfully labelled seeds in the course of ..... issued orders exempting from the tax payable under the a.p.g.s.t.act the sales or purchases of all varieties of certified and truthfully labelled seeds for agricultural purposes. .....

Sri Sai Agritech Vs. Commissioner of Agriculture and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(6)ALD366

..... as confirmed by the first respondent in proceedings dated 18.8.2007, as being illegal, irregular, unreasonable, arbitrary exercise of powers in gross violation of principles of natural justice apart from being contrary to the provisions of the seeds act, 1966 (hereinafter in short referred to as 'the seeds act') and the seeds (control) order, 1983 (hereinafter in short referred to as 'the control order') and consequently, set aside the same with a further direction to the respondents to restore the licence and renew the same ..... authority absolutely uninformed which is a violation of rules 7(1), 8 and 9(1) of rules for the manufacture, use/import/export and storage of hazardous micro-organisms/genetically engineered organisms or cells, 1989 under environmental protection act, 1986.besides, it is found that seed stocks of cotton dharma (420 packets), cotton sindhu (340 packets), sunflower rahul (288 packets), jowar bapuji (21 quintals) were expired and no proper documents were produced indicating their disposal, which is viewed ..... the licensing authority absolutely uninformed which is a violation of rule 7(1), 8 and 9(1)of rules for the manufacture, use/import/export and storage of hazardous micro-organisms/genetically engineered organisms or cells, 1989 under environmental protection act, 1986.besides, it is found that seed stocks of cotton were expired and no proper documents were produced indicating their disposal, which is viewed as intention of the firm for sale of the expired .....

Ram Seeds and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(3)Raj2645

..... the offence on the ground that if at all there is any violation then it is the violation of the seeds (control) order, 1983 (for short, 'the order, 1983' hereinafter) and, therefore, if any offence has been committed then the offence has been committed under the seeds act, 1966 (for short, 'the act, 1966' hereinafter) and the complaint could have been filed for violation of the provisions of the ..... had the complaint been filed under the act, 1966, the accused-petitioners would have a right to get the seeds re-analysed from the central laboratory as there exists, such provision for getting the sample re-tested by the central laboratory, whereas there ..... learned counsel for the petitioners submits that had the prosecution been launched under the act, 1966 then there are certain provisions which prescribe the procedure for taking the sample and ..... of the order, 1983 clearly provides the inspection, taking of sample and its analysis by the seeds laboratory and, therefore, it cannot be said that the order, 1983 does not provide the procedure ..... it may or may not be analogous to the procedure prescribed under the act of 1955 or the rules made thereunder, but at any rate, it cannot be said that no procedure has been provided under the order 1983 and on these premises, the revision petition came ..... act, 1955 does not provide a provision for re-testing of the sample of re-branded seeds by the central laboratory then the petitioners cannot claim such a right unless it is provided under the statute, .....

Seed Association of M.P. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(4)MPHT453

..... sbcc, and in response to the said enquiry, the assistant director, seeds, department of agriculture and co-operation, ministry of agriculture, government of india, had, through a communication dated may 9, 2008, forwarded to the petitioner- association by the director, ministry of environment and forest, government of india, through a communication dated may 26, 2008, has informed that 'there is no provision in seeds act, 1966 and seeds rules, 1968, to obtain prior sale permission of the state government for ..... the seeds act, 1966, and the rules of 1968, no prior permission was required for sale of the bt cotton hybrid seeds. ..... , its members engaged in the dealings of aforesaid bt cotton hybrid seeds variety, have already obtained valid licences issued under the provisions of the seeds act, 1966. ..... be noticed, as has not at all been disputed between the parties, that prior to the amendment of the essential commodities act, through the amendment act, 2006 (act 54 of 2006), cotton seeds were included in the list of essential commodities and as such its sales etc. ..... thus, the question which now arises is as to whether the requisite permission under 1986 act and 1989 rules having already been obtained by the manufacturers/sellers from the geac, and there being no application of the essential commodities act and the seeds (control) order, could it still be said that any prior permission was required by such manufacturers/sellers from the state authorities or the sbcc it may be pertinent .....

Pragati Seeds Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC126

..... state seeds certification agency, alambagh, lucknow under the seeds act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the seeds act).4. ..... the breeder seeds are sown and germinated in the fields, of the agriculturists under the supervision of the seeds certification agency which has been set up under the seeds act, 1966. ..... the supreme court, after analysing the provisions of the seeds act, the rules and the control order as well as the provisions of the mandi adhiniyam, held that process of the production of the certified seeds was done under the seeds act, and that at every stage of production, the seeds was certified by the agency and that there was no nexus between whether the seeds had been chemically treated or not and on the levy of market fee. ..... we are, therefore, of the view that the seeds are not specified agricultural produce under the provisions of the act and, therefore, the business of purchase and sale of seeds under the supervision of the seeds certification agency established under the act is not a business of sale and purchase of specified agricultural produce and as such the first respondent is not required to pay the market fee or take out a licence.37. ..... the supreme court held that the production of seeds under the seeds act was a separate commodity from grain and that the same was not covered under schedule 1 of the mandi adhiniyam and that no market fee was leviable on the sale or purchase of the seeds. .....

Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds, Company Limited Vs. Pothuraju Srinivasa Rao ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... case of opposite party no.2 that the crop is genetically pure and the subject seed consisting of thejaswini chilli seed was tested in seed testing laboratory and it confirmed to the standards of the government prescribed seeds act,1966 and sub rules 1968. ..... of sowing or method of agricultural practices and also they were not aware as to whether sufficient moisture was present in the soil and the date of observation of the alleged non germination of the seed and whether the complainant followed the proper crop management practices with respect to fertilizers, irrigation etc. ..... of the opposite party that the complainant did not adhere to section 13 of seeds act is un sustainable. ..... the complainant has failed to prove that there was any defect in the said seed and also did not get it inspected by seed inspector and infact on receipt of the complaint the staff of the opposite party visited the complainants field on 18.7.2001 and observed that the germination of seed was upto 30% and the nursery bed was heavily infested by weeds. ..... set out in the complaint are that the complainant purchased 5 packets of mahyco f 1 tejaswini chilli seed on 15.5.2001 from opposite party no.1 and sown the same in his acre of land. ..... version of the opposite parties that the complainant has not followed proper crop management practices and their representative visited the complainants field on 18.7.2001 and observed that the germination of the seed was upto 30% and the nursery bed was heavily infested by weeds. .....

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

..... or under this act, he shall, on conviction, be punishable (i) for the first offence with fine which ..... me in implementing the penal provisions of (i) the insecticides act, 1968 and (ii) the drugs and cosmetics act 1940 besides pointing out the changes required in these laws due to change in social order.the seeds act, 1966(a) section 19 of the seeds act reads as under:penalty - if any person (a) contravenes any provision of this act or any rule made thereunder; or(b) prevents a seed inspector from taking sample under this act; or(c) prevents a seed inspector from exercising any other power conferred on him by ..... in the offences taking place in relation to prevention of food adulteration act 1954, the seeds act 1966, the insecticides act 1968 and the drugs and cosmetics act 966 and in the instant cases in relation to prevention of food adulteration act and having found pitiable condition in relation to the misconceptions, knowledge and skill of the implementing agencies, and taking stock of certain provisions which act as obstacle, ultimately resulting into defeating the very object of the parliament .....

Karamchari Avam Adhikari Sangh. Vs. M.P. State Seed Certification Agen ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... state seed certification agency, which is an association constituted under section 8 of the seed act, 1966. ..... in the absence of any power being available to the state government or the finance department to act in the manner done, action taken by the respondents in denying benefit to the employees is unsustainable.9- accordingly, in the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is allowed. ..... state seed certification agency, claim grant of the benefits of 5th pay commission's recommendation with effect from 1.1.96 as per the decision of the board of directors of the state seed certification agency.2- petitioner association, a registered association, claims to be representing the officers and employees working in m.p. ..... state seed certification agency resolved to grant the benefit to the employees. .....