Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: seeds act 1966 Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Page 3 of about 53,247 results (0.144 seconds)

Gene Campaign . Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... however, all hybrids released using this technology shall also be regulated under seed act 1966 and related rules and regulations, its amendments and gazette notification from time to time as applicable. ..... commercial cultivation, too, shall be subject to the seeds act, 1966 and the rules and regulations made thereunder. ..... commercial use of dmh-11 hybrid shall be subject to seed act 1966 and related rules and regulations, its amendments and gazette notifications from time to time as applicable. ix. ..... commercial use will be subject to the seeds act, 1966 and the related rules and regulations. ..... commercial use of dmh-11 hybrid shall be subject to seeds act, 1966. 31 | w.p. ..... the seeds act enacted by the legislature in 1966, notified on 29.12.1966, regulates the quality of seeds for sale and other connected matters. ..... any such use in the farmer s field without due approval from cib&rc would attract appropriate legal action under central insecticides act 1968 and rules 1971, ep act 1986 and the rules made thereunder.17.3 it is learnt by the petitioners that ht transgenic mustard hybrid dmh-11 seed was sown for seed selection in kanpur and bharatpur at the directorate of rapeseed and mustard research (drmr). ..... finally, the moa may also consider issuing a separate notification on priority for the general release of gm crops at par with new seeds policy, while legally ensuring much needed harmonization of both epa under ministry of environment and forests (moef) and the seed act under moa. .....

Prakash Cotton Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. B. Sen and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1979SC675; 1979CENCUS193D; 1979(4)ELT241(SC); (1979)2SCC174; [1979]2SCR1142; 1979(11)LC290(SC)

..... is not in dispute before us that the goods, which are the subject matter of the appeals before us, were removed from the warehouse after the amending ordinance had come into force on july 7, 1966, the customs authorities and the central government were quite right in taking the view that the rate of duty applicable to the imported goods had to be determined according to the law which was prevalent ..... currency into foreign currency or foreign currency into indian currency; (b) 'foreign currency' and 'indian currency' have the meanings respectively assigned to them in the foreign exchange regulation act, 1947.it is thus the clear requirement of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 15 of the act that the rate of duty, rate of exchange and tariff valuation applicable to any imported goods shall be the rate and valuation in force on the date on which ..... to argue that the orders of assessment of the customs duty were also made before the amendment ordinance was promulgated on july 7, 1966, but he did not pursue that line of argument because he was not in a position to produce the so-called assessment orders ..... that the customs (amendment) ordinance, 1966, was promulgated and came into force on july 7, 1966, and was replaced by the customs (amendment) act, 1966. ..... on june 6, 1966, and the customs (amendment) ordinance, 1966, was promulgated on july 7, 1966, by which sections 14 and 15 of the customs act, hereinafter referred to as the act, were amended. ..... by the customs (amendment) act, 1966. .....

Bai Vajia (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Thakorbhai Chelabhai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1979SC993; (1979)0GLR641; (1979)3SCC300; [1979]3SCR291

..... a limited owner.if these two conditions are fulfilled, the sub-section gives her the right to hold, the property as a full owner irrespective of the fact whether she acquired it before or after the commencement of the act.the explanation declares that the property mentioned in sub-section (1) includes both movable and immovable property and then proceeds to enumerate the modes of acquisition of various kinds of property which the sub-section would ..... not, in so many terms, prescribe that she would have a limited interest, she would have no more than a limited interest in the property under the hindu law as it stood prior to the enactment of the act and hence a provision in the instrument prescribing that she would have only a limited interest in the property would be, to quote the words of this court in nirmal chand's case (supra), 'merely recording the true legal ..... a life interest in the properties and there was a clear restriction prohibiting her from alienating the properties; (iii) that despite these restrictions, she continued to be in possession of the properties till 1956 when the act of 1956 came into force; and(iv) that the alienations which she had made in 1960 and 1961 were after she had acquired an absolute interest in the properties.in this view of the matter fazal ali, j ..... 110 of 1966 by 10 persons being the heirs of mohanbhai and motabhai as shown in the pedigree table above, the defendants being bai vajia and the said dhirubhai ..... : [1966]2scr626 where in ramaswami .....

Jaswant Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC115; 1979LabIC1362; (1979)IILLJ371SC; (1979)4SCC440; [1980]1SCR420

..... before examining the petitioners' contentions, it is necessary to have a broad acquaintance with the initiation and implementation of the bhakra-nangal and beas construction projects, the provisions of the punjab reorganisation act, 31 of 1966, and the circumstances in which a conflict has arisen between the competing right of petitioners on one hand, who were recruited directly and the 'deputationists' on the other, who belong to ..... section 80(1) provides that notwithstanding anything contained in the reorganisation act or in any other law, the construction (including the completion of any work already commenced) of the beas project shall, on and from november 1, 1966, be undertaken by the central government on behalf of the successor ..... with the passing of the punjab reorganisation act which came into force on november 1, 1966, the new state of haryana and the union territory of chandigarh came into being, having been formed out of the territory ..... on february 10, 1961 and it is by and on behalf of that board that some of the petitioners were appointed prior to november 1, 1966 when the punjab reorganisation act came into force. ..... act provides that the construction, including the completion of any work already commenced, of the beas project shall on and from the 1st november, 1966 be undertaken by the central government on behalf of the successor states and the state of rajasthan : provided that the governments of the successor states and the state of rajasthan shall provide .....

Balkishan A. Devidayal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1981SC379; (1980)82BOMLR471; 1980CriLJ1424; (1980)4SCC600; [1981]1SCR175

..... is that an inspector of the rpf making an inquiry under the railway property (unlawful possession) act, 1966 into an offence under section 3 of that act, in substance, acts and exercises almost all the powers of a 'police officer' making an investigation under the crpc ..... 1974, of the bombay high court, raise, among others, three important questions, namely :(1) whether an officer of the railway protection force, making an inquiry under the railway property (unlawful possession) act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the 1966 act), in respect of an offence under section 3 of that act of unlawful possession of the railway property, is a police officer for the purposes of section 25, evidence act and section 162 of the crpc. ..... durga prasad (ibid), after carefully examining and comparing the powers of arrest, inquiry and investigation of an officer of the force under the 1966 act with those of a police officer under the code, it was pointed out that such an officer of the rpf does not possess all the attributes of an officer-in-charge of a police station investigating ..... that is to say, the powers of arrest, inquiry and investigation conferred on the central excise officers under act 1 of 1944 (which was under consideration in that case) are very similar to those with which an officer of the rpf is invested under the 1966 act under section 13 of that act of 1944, any central excise officer duly empowered by the central government in this behalf can arrest any person whom he has reason to .....

Dhanpat Oil and General Mills Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1985SC1255; 1986(6)LC121(SC); 1985(21)ELT636(SC); 1985(2)SCALE46; (1985)3SCC599; [1985]Supp2SCR4; 1985(17)LC844(SC)

..... act, 1923, the indian lac cess act, 1930, the indian coconut committee act, 1944 and the indian oil seeds committee act, 1946 ceased to have effect from april 1, 1966 in consequence of which the relative committees constituted under those acts stood dissolved and there was no legislative sanction for the continuance of the levy of cess on the produce after march 31, 1966. ..... out of a writ petition filed in the high court of punjab and haryana for the quashing of proceedings taken under the produce cess act, 1966 for the assessment and recovery of the cess.2. ..... various points were raised before the high court, including the question whether sub-section (2) of section 3 and section 4 of the act and rule 6 of the cess rules were ultra vires and whether the notices issued by the authorities were valid on the ground that no machinery had been provided for the ..... there is also an express provision by section 20 empowering the central government to make rules to carry out the purposes of the act, and particularly sub-section (2) of section 20 envisages that such rules should provide for the form of the monthly return and the manner in which such return should be verified, the ..... that objective parliament enacted the produce cess act, 1966 (shortly referred to as 'the act'). ..... latter obligation is sufficient to bring the occupier within the mischief of sub-section (2) of section 9 of the act it empowers the collector to proceed at once and make an assessment, in the manner prescribed by the rules .....

Delhi Cloth and General Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1987SC2414; (1987)3CompLJ133(SC); JT1987(4)SC35; 1987(2)SCALE715; (1988)1SCC86; [1988]1SCR383

..... factory at a place away from the refinery or port (ii) the rate charges by the railway for the carriage of naptha between two stations-bajuva and dadhevi was unreasonable under section 41(1)(b) of the indian railways act, 1980, and (iii) the railways were showing undue preference or advantage in respect of other traffic and contravening the provisions of section 28 of the indian ..... a different equity from other conduct.the difference may lie in the necessity of showing 'detriment' where one party deliberately promises to waive, modify or discharge his strict legal rights, intending the other party to act on the faith of promise, and the other party actually does act on it, then it is contrary, not only to equity but also to good faith, to allow the promisor to go back on his promise ..... setting up of the factory, the company, by its letter dated september 5, 1966 requested the railway board for a concessional freight rate for the carriage of naptha. ..... and final aspect of the matter to which attention should be drawn is that for the purpose of finding whether an estoppel arises in favour of the person acting on the representation, it is necessary to look into the whole of the representation made ..... . sfc/gen-72 dated 5.9.1966.i am directed to state that the railway board agree to quote a special rate equal to class 85-b (special) cc: k for transport of naptha in train loads from bombay or koyali to kota, for ..... c5 dated november 5, 1966 agreed to quote station to station rate equal to ..... novembers, 1966 .....

State of U.P. and anr. Vs. Engineering Traders

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT1988(1)SC485; 1989Supp(2)SCC416

..... by section 31 of the amending act of uttar pradesh sales tax (amendment and validation) act, 1975, being u.p. ..... we are concerned with the assessment years 1966-67 and 1967-68. ..... act no. ..... in these two appeals the only question with which we are concerned, is whether water pumps were agricultural implements and, as such, liable to be taxed at a lower rate of taxation under the uttar pradesh sales tax act. .....

Budhu Mal Vs. Mahabir Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1988SC1772; JT1988(3)SC281; 1988(2)SCALE294; (1988)4SCC194; [1988]Supp2SCR238; 1988(2)LC514(SC)

..... parties we are of the opinion that on the facts of the instant case the provisions of section 23 of the provincial small cause courts act (hereinafter referred to as the act) are clearly attracted and the plaints of these cases ought to have been returned for presentation to a court having jurisdiction to determine the title ..... appearing for the landlord on the other hand urged that the courts below have rightly interpreted the deed dated 8th december, 1966 to be one which only granted the permission to realise rent and the plea raised by the tenants did not involve ..... it has been urged by learned counsel for the appellants that by the deed dated 8th december, 1966 the right to rent and not only the right to realise the rent was transferred and this right was described in the deed by saying 'i give the benefits ..... one of the pleas raised in defence by the appellants was that the deed dated 8th december, 1966 could not be unilaterally cancelled by mahabir prasad by the subsequent deed dated 3rd november, 1970 and that the rent claimed by mahabir prasad to be in arrears had ..... mahabir prasad inter alia stated that by the deed dated 8th december, 1966 written in favour of sanjeev kumar alias teetu and rajeev kumar alias ..... in case the plea set up by the appellants that by the deed dated 8th december, 1966 the benefit arising out of immovable property which itself constituted immovable property was transferred and in pursuance of the information conveyed in this behalf by mahabir prasad to them .....

Ram Bagas Taparia Vs. Ram Chandra Pal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1989SC426; JT1988(4)SC436; 1988(2)SCALE1550; (1989)1SCC257; 1989(1)LC252(SC)

..... of this position it follows that the remittance of the rent for january 1966 through money order on 26-2-1966 and the deposit made later on 19-3-1966 would not constitute valid payments of rent under the act so as to absolve the appellant the charge of having committed default in payment of rent it has further been found that if the appellant had wanted to avail the benefit of section 17(4) of the act, he should have made a fresh deposit of the rent in accordance with ..... the two courts further held that the remittance of rent by money order on 26-2-1966 was not a valid remittance in so far as the rent for january 1966 is concerned because the remittance was not in accordance with section 4(2) of the act which stipulates that the rent should be paid by the 15th day of the succeeding month in the absence of any contract ..... question, the learned single judge held that the appellant had failed to prove the tender of rent for january 1966 before 15-2-1966 as per section 4 (2) of the act and that the respondent had refused to receive the payment. ..... had made a valid tender of rent for january 1966 and if not, whether the deposit of rent for that month as well as the subsequent months in the office of the rent controller would absolve the appellant of his liability for eviction on the ground of default in payment of rent and (2) whether the appellant had complied with section 17 (1) of the act in order to claim benefit under section 17(4) of the act under the amended provisions of the .....