Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: seeds act 1966 Court: rajasthan Page 9 of about 16,233 results (0.070 seconds)

Mar 30 1977 (HC)

Maggi Bai Vs. Sitaram

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1978Raj1; 1977()WLN159

..... for the respondent (which seems to have prevailed with the court below) is that section 13 is very wide in its terms, and even where a decree may have been passed after the commencement of this act, the section provides that no court shall make an order in favour of a landlord even in execution so long as he is ready and willing to pay the prescribed rent unless it is satisfied that any ..... any decree, or make any order, in favour of a landlord, whether in execution of a de-cree or otherwise, evicting the tenant so long as he is ready and willing to pay rent therefor to the full extent allowable by this act, unless it is satisfied- (a) to (g) xxxxx (h) that the premises are required reasonably and bona fide by the landlord- (i) for the use or occupation of himself or his family, or (ii) for the use or occupation of any person ..... that in view of the amended provisions of section 14 of the rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) act, 1950, hereinafter referred to as the act, the decree for eviction cannot be executed as such because no decree for eviction on the grounds set forth in clause (h) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the act could be passed unless the court was satisfied that greater hardship would be caused to the tenant by passing the ..... a statute are capable of two constructions, one of which is likely to defeat or impair the policy of the act whilst the other construction is likely to assist the achievement of the said policy, then the courts would prefer to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1955 (HC)

Dayachand and ors. Vs. Sanwalchand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1956Raj6

..... the same' way, the period of two years which was to be calculated from the date of the commencement of the limitation ordinance, was the year according to the gregorian calendar because section 25, indian limitation act was made applicable; but the same word 'year' appearing- in the law which was in force on the date of the commencement of the ordinance was the vikrami year as it was defined in the ..... the word 'year' was defined in the marwar limitation act, 1945 as a year reckoned according to the vikram calendar and, therefore, it is urged that wherever the word 'years' appeared in the schedule of that act, it should be taken to mean vikram samwat years.learned counsel for respondents has, on theother hand, urged that the marwar limitation act,1945 as amended by the act of 1949 was repealedby section 12, limitation ordinance, 1950 and ..... the period of limitation for the present suit, according to the limitation ordinance, is three years whereas the period of limitation according to the marwar limitation act, 1945 read with section 4 thereof was six years.this question is concluded by a full benchdecision of this court in -- 'jethmal v. ..... mean the number of years given in the schedule but the number of years as under stood by that law read as a whole.it may be pointed out that in marwar, the marwar limitation act, 1926 was' in force till it was repealed by the marwar limitation act, 1945 section 25 of the act of 1926 laid down that:'all instruments shall, for the purposes of this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 1984 (HC)

Devkinandan and anr. Etc. Vs. Roshan Lal and ors. Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1985Raj11; 1984()WLN647

..... premises to his landlord including the person who is continuing in its possession after the termination of his tenancy otherwise than by a decree for eviction- passed under the provisions of this act; and 'tenant' 'tenant' means a person by whom or on whose account or behalf the rent of any accommodation is, or, but for a contract express or implied, would ..... premises to his landlord including the person who is continuing in its possession after the termination of his tenancy otherwise than by a decree for eviction passed under the provisions of this act; and(b) in the event of death of the person as is referred to in sub-clause (a), his surviving spouse, son, daughter and other heir in accordance with personal law ..... point that mortgagee in possession of agricultural land can induct tenant in respect of such land beyond the period of redemption of the mortgage, if he has acted prudently and bona fide and in cases where the mortgagor agreed with the mortgagee for creation of such tenancy and there is no prohibition in the deed ..... the supreme court judgment that the principle embodied in section 76 casting an obligation on the mortgagee in possession to manage the property prudently as if it were his own, and acts done bona fide and prudently in the course of such management applies ordinarily to the management of agricultural land and has seldom been extended to urban property so as to tie ..... 1966 sc 1721 (supra) again deals with the agricultural tenancy under the rajasthan tenancy act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1951 (HC)

Madangopal Kabra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1951Raj94a; [1951]20ITR214(Raj)

..... jammu and kashmir ;provided that the taxable territories shall be deemed to include:(a) the merged territories :(i) as respect any period after the 31st day of march 1949, for any of the purposes of this act, and(ii) as respects any period included in the previous year, for the purpose of making any assessment for the year ending on the 31st day of march, 1950, or for any subsequent year; and ..... . vii as matters in respect of which the dominion legislature may make laws for the united state but added the following proviso:'nothing contained in the said list or in any other provisions of the act shall be deemed to empower the dominion legislature to impose income-tax or duty in the territories of the united states or to prohibit the imposition of any duty or tax by the legislature of the ..... of jammu and kashmir :(i) as respects any period, for the purposes of sections 4a and 4b,(ii) as respects any period after the 31st day of march, 1950, for any of the purposes of this act, and(iii) as respects any period included in the previous year for the purpose of making any assessment of the year ending on the 31st day of march, 1951, or for any subsequent year;16. ..... pay income-tax for the assessment year 1950-51 in respect of his total income for the year ending 31-8-1960 computed in accordance with the provisions of the income-tax act, as section 3 read with section 2 (14a) proviso (b) (iii) authorized the levy of income-tax on incomes which accrued or were received in rajasthan prior .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 1956 (HC)

Rajvi Abhey Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1958Raj12

..... to enquire into the matter, the contention on behalf of the state is that enquiry will now be made by the jagir commissioner as provided by section 37 of the rajasthan land reforms and resumption of jagirs act.the case of rajvi amarsingh on this point is not quite clear, and all that is said is that the applicant can press his claim before the proper forum which has now been created for ..... the argument is that these words mean that the question should have been finally determined before it arises in the course of proceedings under the jagir resumption act, and if it is finally determined the jagir commissioner will have no right to go into it.but if the question has not been finally determined, and has only been determined say by the first court or tribunal competent to decide, ..... the conclusions therefore at which we arrive after a perusal of section 37 of the jagir resumption act and sections 3 to 6 of the validating act as to the jurisdiction of the jagir commissioner are these:(1) the validating act is a general law and applies where the jagir has not been resumed. ..... omitting the parenthetical clause appearing in section 37 that section reads as follows -'if in the course of a proceeding under this act any question relating to title, right or interest in any jagir land arises and the question so arising has not already been determined by a competent authority, the jagir commissioner shall proceed etc. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1981 (HC)

Smt. Geeta Bajaj and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1982Raj48

..... in respect of a cinema building which has already come up, it is reasonable to assume that while dealing with an application for permission to construct a cinema building filed under section 5a of the act, the licensing authority shall have due regard to the provisions of rule 16, for if he were to grant such application and permit a cinema building to come up without taking into consideration the provisions ..... with enactments and rules in some other states, the conclusions which clearly emerge from it may be stated as follows :(i) in all the enactments of various states and the rules framed by them including the act made by the legislature of the state of rajasthan and the rules framed thereunder, it is made abundantly clear that 'grant of a no objection certificate', 'grant of a permission to construct a cinema ..... section 5a and the same does not go beyond enacting that an application for construction of a cinema building shall be made to the licensing authority under this act in accordance with the rules made under this act, and that the licensing authority may thereupon subject to the control of the state government and to any rules rnade in this behalf and after such enquiry ..... air 1966 sc 828, their lordships held that in exceptional cases, a stranger having no proprietary or even fiduciary interest in the subject matter of the dispute may be granted certiorari or prohibition on his showing that the court or tribunal concerned has acted without jurisdiction and that the act or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1975 (HC)

Prabhashanker Vs. Smt. Rukmani and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1976Raj17; 1975()WLN618

..... or contract, no court shall pass any decree, or make any order, in favour of a landlord, whether in execution of a decree or otherwise, evicting the tenant so long as he is ready and willing to pay rent therefor to the full extent allowable by this act, unless it is satisfied- (a) to (g) xx xx xx (h) that the premises are requiredreasonably and bona fide by the landlord-- ' (i) for the use or occupation of himself or his family, or (ii) for the use or occupation of any person for whose benefit the ..... court shall pass any decree or make any order in favour of a landlord whether in execution of a decree or otherwise evicting the tenant so long as he is ready and willing to pay rent therefor to the full extent allowable by this act unless the court is satisfied that the premises are required reasonably and bona fide by the landlord for the use and occupation of himself and his family. ..... but the question that arises for consideration is whether the amended provisions of the act shall also apply to pending proceedings which may fall under any of the following ..... it is contended on behalf of the tenant-appellant that in view of section 14(2) of the act as amended by the amendment ordinance of 1975, the decree passed by the two lower courts was not proper and the same may be ..... there can be no doubt that the provisions of the act as amended by the amendment ordinance of 1975 shall apply to the suits instituted by a landlord after the commencement of the amendment ordinance of 1975, that is, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1969 (HC)

Devi Sahai Agarwal Vs. Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1970Raj48; 1969()WLN111

..... 's contentions are that the permit on jaipur-bikaner route having been granted by the sta could not be cancelled by the rta, a subordinate authority in view of the language of section 60 of the motor vehicles act (hereinafter called 'the act'); that the principles of natural justice have been violated firstly because the charge against the petitioner was in regard to shah-pura-behror vehicle for going on the said route without necessary documents ..... a petition under article 226 of the constitution of india complaining against the cancellation of a stage carriage permit under section 60 of the motor vehicles act and seeks a writ of certiorari against the order of the transport appellate tribunal, rajasthan dated the 23rd january, 1964.2. ..... this is necessary because there is an appeal provided under the motor vehicles act itself and no appellate authority can possibly apply its mind on the facts and assess them unless it has some sort of memoranda regarding the evidence adduced before the ..... this question revolves around the pivot of section 60 of the act, and it is therefore, proper to extract out the relevant portion of ..... judgment of the bench observed:'on the other hand an order cancelling or suspending a permit passed under section 60 of the motor vehicles act is a quasi judicial order which is appealable under section 64(b). ..... 'in this case, air 1966 madh pra 144, this having not been done, the order of the cancellation o the permit was quashed.11. in s. ..... , air 1966 madh pra 144 dixit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2001 (HC)

Smt. Mohini Devi Vs. Ram Chandra Vardani

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001(3)WLC622; 2002(2)WLN549

..... of tara singh (supra) the respondent preferred an appeal against the judgment of the learned district judge, ajmer dismissing the wifes' petition for restitution of conjugal rights under section 9 of the hindu marriage act on the ground that the judgment adversely affects, the appellant husband in that the learned judge has found that the respondent is still the wife of husband. ..... on the other hand, the learned counsel for the appellant has argued that although the petition under section 13 of the act has been dismissed by the family court, but a reading of the judgment as a whole, would show that the petitioner had won the suit and the dismissal of the petition was not on account of ..... in the similar situation, in the case in hand, the petition of the respondent-petitioner filed under section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1985 was dismissed on the ground that the panchayat had already granted divorce to the parties on 17.7.1991 and as such no second decree of divorce dissolving the marriage of parties ..... and reversed the findings of the courts regarding benami transaction and held that sale deed was executed in favour of pyare lal and that transaction is hit by section 3 of the benami act and consequently, the learned single judge dismissed the suit filed by the appellant.18. ..... out of the wedlock, husband ram chandra brought a petition against his wife under section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (hereinafter called the 'act') for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 2015 (HC)

Om Prakash Vadvani Vs. Devendra Kumar

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... to be raised and was raised before the lower appellate court also is that the order dated 16/1/2001 determining the provisional rent under section 13(3) of the act was illegal and nonest order because as per the proviso to section 13(3) of the act of 1950, the determination of the rent could not go beyond the period of three years as rest of the arrears of rent was barred by the ..... 1966 ..... vide order dated 12/7/2002, which was upheld upto high court, but even otherwise also, the provisions of section 13(4) of the act, which mandated the tenant to pay the rent determined under section 13(3) of the act and also to pay monthly rent thereafter regularly and that monthly rent having not been paid by the defendant tenant, the mandatory requirement ..... of act under section 13(4) was not complied with and the order passed under section 13(5) of the act striking down the defence was bound to result in an eviction decree against the tenant and now at this stage, no substantial question of law can ..... the directions of the trial court to pay the arrears of rent and even subsequent monthly rent was not paid by him as required by section 13(4) of the act and which was not even subject matter of the order passed under section 13(3) of the act and the eviction decree could be even independently upheld on this ground and that is why the order under section 13(5) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //