Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act 2002 Section 1 - Judgment Search Results

Magan Singh Vs. the General Manager, Uco Bank and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

object being to enable the family to get over the financial crisis which it faces at the time of the death rule of open recruitment is intended to meet the immediate financial problems if so faced by the bereaved family of the object being to enable the family to get over the financial crisis which it faces at the time of the death object being to enable the family to get over the financial crisis which it faces at the time of the death object being to enable the family to get over the financial crisis which it faces at the time of the death object being to enable the family to get over the financial crisis which it faces at the time of the death object being to enable the family to get over the financial crisis which it faces at the time of the death aforesaid the petitioner contended in the writ petition that the action of the respondents in denying him appointment on compassionate basis perennial or perpetual in nature admittedly the appellant born on 19 07 1988 became major in the year 2006 but then

Ghanshyam Lal Kala Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

adequate means of livelihood derived from landed property or immovable assets if the candidate is otherwise eligible for appointment the instructions adequate means of livelihood derived from landed property or immovable assets if the candidate is otherwise eligible for appointment the instructions adequate means of livelihood derived from landed property or immovable assets if the candidate is otherwise eligible for appointment the instructions adequate means of livelihood derived from landed property or immovable assets 5 admittedly respondent shanti lal was not possessing qualification as adequate means of livelihood derived from landed property or immovable assets 5 admittedly respondent shanti lal was not possessing qualification as no 5 both have qualified the high school examination by securing first division the eligibility and criterion for the selection of adequate means of livelihood derived from landed property or immovable assets if the candidate is otherwise eligible for appointment the instructions regard to having adequate means of livelihood derived from landed property or immovable assets 5 admittedly respondent shanti lal was not petitioner is challenging the validity of judgment dated 30th january 2002 passed by the central administrative tribunal jodhpur bench jodhpur in dated 24 11 2003 of the cat in oa no 1041 of 1996 by which the application of respondent no 5

Bhura Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

criminal case was lodged regular investigation was made and a charge sheet then was preferred the case was committed to the of learned counsel for the appellant that pw 4 is interested witness being wife of the deceased and therefore conviction should case are that in the intervening night of 17 3 2002 and 18 3 2002 accused bhura came to the residence accused appellant guilty for commission of an offence punishable under section 302 ipc therefore recorded the conviction and sentenced him to to life includes injury no 5 10 11 12 13 15b 16 17 18 19 25 30 and 35th 6 in

Karan Singh Rathore Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

c d and 13 2 of the prevention of corruption act 1988 and sections 409 420 467 471 477a 120b of 9 granting sanction for his prosecution in fir nos 279 2002 and 280 2002 registered by the anti corruption bureau rajasthan by the anti corruption bureau rajasthan jaipur for offences under sections 13 1 c d and 13 2 of the prevention anti corruption bureau rajasthan jaipur for offences under sections 13 1 c d and 13 2 of the prevention of corruption

Pappu @ Patwari and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

of blows by any of the accused and therefore the charge against them in no case travels beyond section 326 ipc her that gandhi shambhu and patwari gave him lathi blows interesting enough to note that smt anguri was not produced by 2002 morning a man who was participating in his usual activities is normally supposed to be vigilant and conscious while giving whereas the first information report was lodged on 31 7 2002 and that too at 7 00 pm i e after appellants were put forth for examination as per provisions of section 313 cr p c and they also defended themselves by is already undergone by them with a fine of rs 1000 each in event of default in depositing the fine both

Manohar Vs. Suresh Tekchandani and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

children are pursuing their studies at jodhpur therefore in the interest of justice although we are dismissing this appeal and granting children are pursuing their studies at jodhpur therefore in the interest of justice although we are dismissing this appeal and granting children are pursuing their studies at jodhpur therefore in the interest of justice although we are dismissing this appeal and granting children are pursuing their studies at jodhpur therefore in the interest of justice although we are dismissing this appeal and granting children are pursuing their studies at jodhpur therefore in the interest of justice although we are dismissing this appeal and granting children are pursuing their studies at jodhpur therefore in the interest of justice although we are dismissing this appeal and granting children are pursuing their studies at jodhpur therefore in the interest of justice although we are dismissing this appeal and granting the appellant under section 7 of the guardian and wards act 1890 was rejected on the ground of territorial jurisdiction 2 2009 an application under order 1 rule 10 read with section 151 cpc was filed on 05th november 2009 by one of order dated 04th november 2009 an application under order 1 rule 10 read with section 151 cpc was filed on

Karma and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2010(1)Raj745

to ex p 75 5 after completing regular investigation a charge sheet as per provisions of section 173 cr p c arrested as the last person from among the accused and interestingly he was not identified by pahad singh the delay for of disclosure made as per section 27 of the evidence act 35 pw 12 kishan singh also states that in presence 6 2002 pancha and lala were arrested on 6 6 2002 and dhanna was arrested on 7 6 2002 accused dalla completing regular investigation a charge sheet as per provisions of section 173 cr p c was filed charging the accused appellants singh pw 11 narayan singh and pw 12 kishan singh 15 pw 8 bhoor singh stated that he was accompanying police

Rakesh Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2010(2)Raj1847

two amendments first amendment was brought by the banking public financial institutions and negotiable instruments laws amendment act 1988 and second two amendments first amendment was brought by the banking public financial institutions and negotiable instruments laws amendment act 1988 and second two amendments first amendment was brought by the banking public financial institutions and negotiable instruments laws amendment act 1988 and second two amendments first amendment was brought by the banking public financial institutions and negotiable instruments laws amendment act 1988 and second two amendments first amendment was brought by the banking public financial institutions and negotiable instruments laws amendment act 1988 and second two amendments first amendment was brought by the banking public financial institutions and negotiable instruments laws amendment act 1988 and second two amendments first amendment was brought by the banking public financial institutions and negotiable instruments laws amendment act 1988 and second criminal procedure cannot override section 145 of the n i act the stage of enquiry is pre summoning stage the word act by the negotiable instruments amendment and miscellaneous provisions act 2002 to do away with all the stages and processes in other person as a witness in support of the complainant section 145 1 cannot be read as carving out an exception also starts with non obstante clause the impact of section 142 has been described after making comparison of the corresponding provisions

Ram Narayan and ors. Vs. Smt. Asha Devi and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

had given authority to a subordinate or administrative agency to enforce the operation of any one of them at any time notified under sub section 3 of section 1 of the act and does not talk of extension of the act to act is the date notified under sub section 3 of section 1 obviously the date notified is 1 4 2003 according been made applicable even after repealing the old act of 1950 by section 32 of the new act of 2001 the

Naresh Kumar Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2010(2)Raj1656

that apart under section 15 4 of rajasthan rent control act 2001 plaintiff is always at liberty to file rejoinder only not been submitted by respondent plaintiff within period stipulated under section 15 4 of act 2001 as regards affidavit learned tribunal over ruled vide order impugned 4 that apart under section 15 4 of rajasthan rent control act 2001 plaintiff is always