Section 8 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 8 Sorted by: old Court: chennai Year: 1976 Page 1 of about 316 results (0.95 seconds)P.S. Angaiya Raja a Firm Represented by Its Partner Subramania Raja an ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-02-1976
Reported in : (1976)2MLJ80
the application of section 5 of the limitation act 4 section 9 1 of the city tenants protection act provides that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMythili Raman Vs. CaptaIn K.T. Raman
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-02-1976
Reported in : (1976)1MLJ399
..... proceedings the husband filed a counter affidavit opposing the aforesaid application under section 24 peculiarly enough the court below did not hear this application ..... the hearing of the above said application viz the application under section 24 was also filed as the court below had adjourned the ..... c m a no 91 of 1969 is allowed as indicated above 8 c m a no 336 of 1968 which is against the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP.S. Angaiya Raja Vs. A.K.D. Alagaraja and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-02-1976
Reported in : AIR1977Mad142
..... c of the provincial insolvency act mr padmananbhan learned counsel for the respondents submitted that section 9 1 of the city tenants protection act should be construed as meaning that unless ..... but under the circumstances there will be no order as to costs 8 revision allowed limitation act xxxvi of 1963 section 5 applicability applicable to all applications filed before a civil court application .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.S. Alwar Iyengar Vs. Tahsildar and Record Officer and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-04-1976
Reported in : (1979)1MLJ439
..... of appeal under section 6 and a further right of revision under section 7 of the act section 8 is a procedural section and it lays ..... the approved record of tenancy rights clause a of sub section 1 of section 4 needs extraction because the fourth respondent s application ..... counsel appearing for the fourth respondent places strong reliance on section 16 a and contends that though the civil court may .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. S. Chandappa Iyer (Died) and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-06-1976
Reported in : [1976]103ITR810(Mad)
included in the assessee s hands under the provisions of section 64 iii of the income tax act 1961 3 the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. South India Steels and Sugars Ltd.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-06-1976
Reported in : [1977]109ITR341(Mad)
..... formed part of the actual cost of the assessee within the meaning of section 10 5 of the indian income tax act of 1922 and that ..... forsetting up of the sugar factory and that a sum of rs 8 94 268 referable to the machinery was of a revenue nature and ..... acquiring the assets the vehicles were maintained for setting up the machinery etc 8 in respect of the miscellaneous expenses of rs 1 28 492 the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTE.i.D. Parry Ltd. Vs. Industrial Tribunal and anr.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-07-1976
Reported in : (1977)ILLJ276Mad
..... payable to an employee on the termination of his employment section 5 enables the government to exempt any establishment factory mine ..... not less favourable than the benefits conferred under this act section 14 con ins the overriding provision that readsthe provisions of ..... been properly terminated under section 19 6 of the industrial disputes act the second reference was invalid 8 from this it will .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarumuthu S. Chockalingam Vs. T. Kannappan and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-07-1976
Reported in : 1977CriLJ1382
..... complainant 3 the investigation if any made under the powers conferred by section 202 of the criminal procedure code vide mustafa rahim v motilal chunilal 1907 ..... vacated the house on 29 8 1975 they could not be held liable for an offence under section 447 or section 448 i p c and ..... or under section 380 i p c cannot be made out but then if on 29 8 1975 they had vacated the bungalow in pursuance .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Management of E.i.D. Parry Limited Vs. the Industrial Tribunal and ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-07-1976
Reported in : (1976)2MLJ473
..... counsel relies on the decisions in bangalore w g and section mills company v their workers 1968 illj555sc and employers thungabhadra ..... payable to an employee on the termination of his employment section 5 enables the government to exempt any establishment factory mine ..... been properly terminated under section 19 6 of the industrial disputes act the second reference was invalid 8 from this it will .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. India Radiators Ltd.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-07-1976
Reported in : [1976]105ITR680(Mad)
its costs counsel s fee rs 250 direct taxation bonus section 40 of income tax act 1961 and payment of bonus
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT