Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Court: karnataka Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 122 results (0.313 seconds)Venkataramana Subnaya Bhat and anr. Vs. Timmappa Venkatraman Hegde and ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-23-1977
Reported in : AIR1977Kant203; 1977(1)KarLJ353
dismissed section 20 contempt of courts act 70 of 1971 sections 11 12 s r bannurmath a n venugopala gowda jj up to rs 25 000 and also recommend for disciplinary action against him thus commission is empowered to enforce its own
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCement Marketing Co. of India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxe ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-07-1977
Reported in : (1977)6CTR(Kar)194; ILR1977KAR822; [1977]40STC161(Kar)
have incurred towards maintaining himself had he been alive further section 163 a read with schedule ii of the act itself further section 163 a read with schedule ii of the act itself having provided the percentage of deduction to be effected
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.B. Sathyanarayana Rao and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-05-1977
Reported in : AIR1977Kant221; ILR1977KAR1246; 1977(2)KarLJ192
meaning of article 366 12 of the constitution of india section 2 15 of the kvat act 2003 and also section and also section 2 7 of the sale of goods act 1930 further the electro magnetic waves used in the operation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBasappa Basavantanpa Sureban and ors. Vs. Ningangouda Dyavanagouda Pat ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-11-1977
Reported in : 1978CriLJ460
1976 issuing process against petitioners accused for the offences under sections 193 and 455 of the i p code 2 the arose with reference to section 170 of the karnataka police act there was absence of a complaint by legally competent authority
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHukamichand Devkisen Sarda and ors. Vs. Ratanlal Rupchand Heda and ors ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-22-1977
Reported in : 1977CriLJ1370
any suit or any other proceeding for relief under sub section 2 has to be read disjunctively and not conjunctively otherwise with jurisdiction to cancel registration of a design made under act said power vests only with controller and high court refusal
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMckenzies Ltd. Vs. State of Mysore (Karnataka) and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-23-1977
Reported in : AIR1978Kant89; 1978(1)KarLJ57
of this court or the power of this court under section 115 of the code of civil procedure cannot be taken that refusal to accord leave under section 5 of the act will result in substantial miscarriage of justice it has to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited Breweries Ltd. Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Mysore and ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-24-1977
Reported in : [1978]115ITR120(KAR); [1978]115ITR120(Karn); 1977(2)KarLJ86
18 of the companies profits surtax act 1964 read with section 256 1 of the income tax act 1961 made by ltd and herbertsons ltd on effecting credit sales to these companies the assessee used to pass the usual entries regarding such breathes life into previous grant as per existing provisions of act indian evidence act 1872 section 115 s r bannurmath a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSaraswatibai Vs. Malati
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-14-1977
Reported in : [1979]49CompCas387(Kar)
s mukharji j observed all that sub section 6 of section 39 insurance act does is to confer on the nominee right of the appellant under section 39 of the insurance act 1938 2 the facts which are necessary for the determination
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTController of Estate Duty, Mysore Vs. T.M. Nanaiah
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-06-1977
Reported in : [1977]108ITR888(KAR); [1977]108ITR888(Karn); 1977(1)KarLJ132
amount to a disposition in terms of explanation 2 to section 2 15 of the act 17 in view of the debt or any right brought about by the inaction or action of the deceased and whether such inaction or action was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyed Shah Mohd. Hussaini and anr. Vs. KhutbuddIn and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-04-1977
Reported in : AIR1977Kant223; 1977(1)KarLJ374
the circumstances 8 petition allowed limitation act 36 of 1963 section 5 n k patil j order rejecting application for re see shatrugan das v sham das the implications of their action are that they have to accept their opponents as witnesses
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT