Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Court: chhattisgarh Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 80 results (0.21 seconds)Baghel Prasad Dharam Chand Jewellers Vs. Chandra Prakash Vaidya
Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : Aug-21-2002
Reported in : 2002(4)MPHT18(CG)
his son respondent filed suit for eviction against appellant under section 12 1 f of act suit decreed in favour of for eviction against appellant under section 12 1 f of act suit decreed in favour of respondent appellant filed appeal dismissed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSachIn Sharma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.
Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : Jun-21-2002
Reported in : 2002(5)MPHT12(CG)
orderfakhruddin j 1 heard 2 this petition has been filed by the petitioner under article 226 of the constitution of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJyoti Bai Nagesh and anr. Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg
Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : Mar-15-2002
Reported in : [2002(95)FLR152]; 2002(3)MPHT47(CG)
orderfakhruddin j 1 heard 2 it is submitted that on 12 3 2002 a cheque of bank of maharashtra has...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Rajendra Dubey Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : Mar-15-2002
Reported in : 2002(2)MPHT58(CG)
high court would decline to interfere even if the state action complained of is unconstitutional or illegal because the courts interference
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamesh Kumar JaIn Vs. President, Devanand JaIn Higher Secondary School ...
Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : Mar-11-2002
Reported in : [2002(94)FLR375]; 2002(2)MPHT41(CG)
orderfakhruddin j 1 heard 2 the grievance of the petitioner is that his services have been terminated and the departmental...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArvind Bhai Selarka Vs. Dilip Gogad and anr.
Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : Nov-20-2002
Reported in : 2003CriLJ3360; 2003(1)MPHT60(CG)
evidence 7 so far as interpretation of the provisions of section 138 are concerned the apex court had an occasion to the context envisaged in section 138 of the n i act invites a liberal interpretation for the person who has the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Dhano Devi Vs. Hulas Ram and ors.
Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : May-29-2002
Reported in : 2004ACJ2092; 2002(4)MPHT12(CG)
are that in an accident s claims an application under section 140 of motor vehicles act filed by the claimant was a beneficial legislation and provisions of section 140 of the act have been introduced in the year 1988 on the ground
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Shakuntala Singh Vs. Dauram Ratankar and ors.
Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : Jul-12-2002
Reported in : AIR2002Chh16
sc 1041 held as under on a plain reading of section 82 which indicates as to the person who can be subject to the provisions of the representation of the people act 1951 and the rules made thereunder section 87 1 expressly
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShaik Gouse MohiddIn Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : Aug-26-2002
Reported in : 2002CriLJ4417; 2003(86)ECC372; 2003(1)MPHT5(CG)
of section 60 with a further right of appeal under section 63 3 of the act confiscation or forfeiture of a the act and still claim the vehicle 6 the ndps act does not contemplate execution or extinction of an innocent owner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Brijmohan Lal Vs. Smt. Daljit Kaur
Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : Jul-16-2002
Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT55(CG)
has to be heard and it cannot be dismissed 6 section 13 1 and section 13 6 of the m p of section 13 1 of the m p accommodation control act 1961 and therefore the appeal be dismissed 5 learned counsel
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT