Section 617 Of The Companies Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 617 of the companies act Court: authority for advance rulings Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 9 results (0.248 seconds)In Re: Advance Ruling No. P. 2 of
Court : Authority for Advance Rulings
Decided on : May-09-1995
Reported in : (1996)221ITR172AAR
..... to the applicant s sister company not being available march 31 was the last date of the grace period allowed under the proviso to section 211 of the act therefore the representative of ..... itr 843 kar cit v kumudam publications p ltd 1981 128 itr 617 mad 1 the business of the applicant company is to make hold and manage investments in india the business .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Advance Ruling No. P-9 of
Court : Authority for Advance Rulings
Decided on : Dec-22-1995
Reported in : (1996)220ITR377AAR
given notice of any beneficial interest in the shares under section 187c of the companies act 1956 and that therefore they that no notice has been given either by the applicant companies or by the british bank of any beneficial interest in relate to those assessable as capital gains under the indian act 8 to invoke the benefit of articles 10 and 15
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMonte Harris Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court : Authority for Advance Rulings
Decided on : Aug-04-1995
Reported in : (1996)218ITR413AAR
should be a non resident on the definition contained in section 2 30 of the act as applicable to the present development he has served for about 25 years with various companies in the united states and europe and claims to have 1 of the income tax act 1961 hereinafter called the act are capable of easy answer however a couple of objections
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: P. No. 19 of 1995
Court : Authority for Advance Rulings
Decided on : Dec-18-1995
Reported in : (1999)238ITR610AAR
at par with normal exports in terms of the relevant section of the income tax act 1961 which grants exemption to possible to postulate that the rents received from the indian companies in rupees would necessarily be less than the amount which section 245q 1 of the income tax act 1961 the act the applicant is a private limited company incorporated in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: P. No. 20 of 1995
Court : Authority for Advance Rulings
Decided on : Sep-08-1995
Reported in : (1999)237ITR382AAR
the applicant has been employed elsewhere too the terms of section 10 5b do not require that the employee who claims technician within the meaning of section 10 5b of the act and is entitled to the exemption conferred by that clause
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Advance Ruling A. No. P-5 of
Court : Authority for Advance Rulings
Decided on : Aug-14-1995
Reported in : (1997)223ITR379AAR
furnishing to the assessing officer a declaration under the latter section along with his return of income for any assessment year which is not a private company as defined in the companies act 1956 neither of the banks answers the description of exchange and investment in foreign exchange bonds immunities and exemptions act 41 of 1991 the terms and conditions are governed by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: No. P/6 of 1995
Court : Authority for Advance Rulings
Decided on : Sep-08-1995
Reported in : (1998)234ITR371AAR
income tax act 1961 sections 9 9 1 28 to 44c 44d 90 2 115a in applying this term to other types of associations and companies in defining the nationality of a company one can have sub section 2 of section 90 of the income tax act the applicant being a national of uk would be entitled
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Advance Ruling P. No. 13 of
Court : Authority for Advance Rulings
Decided on : Aug-23-1995
Reported in : (1997)228ITR487AAR
in section 115a will apply however when we come to section 115a the rate of tax will be applicable differently to 1 consists of two clauses clause a applies to foreign companies as well as other categories of non resident assessees and which deduction of tax at source is obligatory under the act we shall assume for the purposes of this question a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: P. No. 18 of 1995
Court : Authority for Advance Rulings
Decided on : Jun-29-1995
Reported in : (1999)238ITR575AAR
office staff and all other expenses not specified in this section as well as the consultant s fee 2 remuneration for company s ltd apparently this attempt was successful and the companies decided to continue the joint venture the broad terms of it is said firstly that the rate of deduction should actually have been 55 per cent applicable to business profits and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT