Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 55 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 55 Sorted by: recent Court: himachal pradesh Year: 1961 Page 1 of about 23 results (0.148 seconds)
Dec 19 1961 (HC)

Kapur Chand Vs. Inspector-general of Police and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-1961

Reported in : AIR1962HP35

f i r no 21 dated 19 11 1960 under sections 457 and 380 i p c p s arki in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 03 1961 (HC)

Municipal Committee Through Its Secretary Vs. Ram Lal and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-03-1961

Reported in : 1962CriLJ150

no 1 was acquitted on appeal of an offence under section 16 of the prevention of food adulteration act 1954 2

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 23 1961 (HC)

Tula and ors. Vs. Sadh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-23-1961

Reported in : AIR1962HP28

in the exercise of powers as a collector according to section 3 of the indian evidence act all judges and magistrates

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 1961 (HC)

Parmatma Ram and ors. Vs. Siri Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-14-1961

Reported in : AIR1962HP19

..... be granted against him according to the proviso to sub section 1 of section 17 the provincial government has the power to direct ..... alternative remedy the relevantprovisions are contained in rules 54 and 55 of themunicipal election rules 1957 the material portions of those ..... by an election petition presented in accordance with these rules 55 an election petition against the return of a candidate at .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 1961 (HC)

Shri Amar Chand Butail and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-01-1961

Reported in : AIR1962HP43

..... deposited by respondent no 1 either by mistake or under coercion that section also is therefore not applicable i therefore hold that the appellants ..... making payment of certain sum to respondent no 1 as per section 204 principal cannot revoke authority given to his agent after authority ..... appeal no 5 59 shall be borne by the parties themselves 55 let a copy of this judgment be placed onthe record of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 11 1961 (HC)

Rajkumar Rajindra Singh Vs. H.P. Administration and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-11-1961

Reported in : AIR1964HP19

of the indianevidence act be not applicable the principleunderlying that section would be applicable tothe instant case as that section did v collector central excise allahabad reported in air 1960 all 551 10 it has next to be seen if there is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 04 1961 (HC)

Sant and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-04-1961

Reported in : AIR1962HP1

p c be set aside 4 the relevant portion of section 522 cri p c runs as below whenever a person

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 1961 (HC)

Kapuru and anr. Vs. Gulaba

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-30-1961

Reported in : AIR1962HP5

code and it was held that the proviso to sub section 4 of section 145 is merely an enabling provision of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 22 1961 (HC)

Siri Ram and anr. Vs. Niranjan Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-22-1961

Reported in : AIR1962HP52

such persons as he may authorize in this behalf and section 620 empowers the central government to direct by a notification

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 27 1961 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Wazir Chand and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-27-1961

Reported in : AIR1962HP24

barred article 181 of schedule to limitation act 1908 and section 20 of arbitration act 1940 appeal against order whereby agreement reported in air 1933 lah 18 and air 1949 mad 559 but in those rulings it has already been seen the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //