Section 55 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 55 Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Year: 2009 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.282 seconds)Government of Karnataka Represented by Its Principal Secretary, Financ ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-02-2009
Reported in : ILR2009KAR633
..... taken care of separately by other statutory provisions as noticed earlier viz sections 55 1 73 74 75 76 and 77 apart from providing for ..... under the provisions of clause f of sub section 1 of section 52 and sub section 4 of section 53 shall be liable on conviction by a ..... made submissions defending the validity of the provisions of sub section 1 of section 72 of the act that while the levy of penalty .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPhilips Electronics India Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-02-2009
Reported in : [2009]20STT314
..... separately by other statutory provisions as noticed earlier viz sections 55 1 73 74 75 76 and 77 apart from providing for ..... the provisions of clause f of sub section 1 of section 52 and sub section 4 of section 53 shall be liable on conviction by ..... rationale or justification has only resulted in arbitrariness rendering sub section 1 of section 72 of the act unconstitutional on the touchstone of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPhilips Electronics India Ltd. Reptd. by Its Manager - Corporate Fisca ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-02-2009
Reported in : 2009(3)AIRKarR1; AIR2009NOC2187
..... care of separately by other statutory provisions as noticed earlier viz sections 55 1 73 74 75 76 and 77 apart from providing ..... the provisions of clause if of sub section 1 of section 52 and sub section 4 of section 53 shall be liable on conviction by ..... rationale or justification has only resulted in arbitrariness rendering sub section 1 of section 72 of the act unconstitutional on the touchstone of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTarget Tours and Travels, Bangalore. Vs. National Departmental Stores, ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-05-2009
Reported in : 2009(2)KCCR1132
..... 10 though the learned counsel contended that the presumption which arises under section 139 of the act has not been rebutted and by cross examination ..... to take the action against the accused for the offence punishable under section 138 of the act in pursuance of the summons issued the ..... 12 5 1997 under receipt no 2497 rs 30 000 and rs 55 000 on 15 5 1997 under receipt nos 2969 and 2965 respectively .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew India Assurance Company Limited Vs. V.i. Mathews and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-05-2009
Reported in : ILR2009KAR1694:2009(2)KCCR1518:2009(5)AIRKarR2:AIR2009NOC2478
appeal allowed in part motor vehicles act 59 of 1988 section 168 k sreedhar rao s n sathyanarayana jj accident determination
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Karnataka and anr. Vs. Mohammed Shafi
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-05-2009
Reported in : 2009(2)KarLJ514; 2009(4)KCCR2654; 2009(3)AIRKarR450; AIR2009NOC1907(D.B)
be defrayed out of the grants referred to in sub section 2 of section 12 1 5 section 17 deals with
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax and anr. Vs. Ace Multitaxes Systems Pvt. Lt ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-05-2009
Reported in : [2009]317ITR207(KAR); [2009]317ITR207(Karn)
sabhahit j banking companies acquisition transfer of undertakings act 1970 section 19 2 d indian bank employees pension regulations 1995 regulation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirst Leasing Company of India Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Comm ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-06-2009
Reported in : (2009)26VST460(Karn)
18 2007 vide annexure c1 passed by the respondent under section 12 of the karnataka sales tax act 1957 for the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOnam Agarbathi Company Rep. by Its Partners, Sri. K.K. Rangaiah Vs. th ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-07-2009
Reported in : (2009)223CTR(Kar)465; ILR2009KAR1345
concern m s o m c also dis allowed under section 40 b of the income tax act on the ground
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.V. Sreenivasulu S/O Late S.V. Chetty and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. the Stat ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-07-2009
Reported in : ILR2009KAR1565:2009(2)KCCR898:2009(2)AIRKarR526
orders impugned in relation to the ambit of the charging section 14 power to tax is not an incidental power under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT