Section 3 Of The Commissions Of Inquiry Act - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 3 of the commissions of inquiry act Court: kerala Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 135 results (1.58 seconds)Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax Vs. Bombay Burmah Trading Corp ...
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-23-1980
Reported in : [1981]131ITR154(Ker)
relevant to the assessment year 1968 69 was admissible under section 5 j of the act the tribunal found that the amount of rs 5 312 35 claimed by way of deduction for the year 1968 69 in computing the agricultural income under the agricultural income tax act 2 the assessment years concerned are 1968 69 1969 70
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKerala Electrical and Allied Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Canara Bank and ...
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-25-1980
Reported in : AIR1980Ker151
may thus enforce his rights is void to that extent section 28 makes two kinds of agreements void what we are the plaintiff supplied motors and other electrical appliances to the 3rd defendant on credit the bank will be responsible to the year from the date hereof and unless a suit or action to enforce claim under the guarantee is filed against us
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH.S. Shivakantappa Vs. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Dec-17-1980
Reported in : [1982]134ITR481(Ker)
claim for deduction put forward by the assessee is under section 5 j of the act which provides for deduction of the indian i t act 1922 which corresponds to section 37 of the i t act 1961 whereunder any expenditure laid charges in connection with proceedings before the i t investigation commission could be deducted under section 10 2 xv of the are not allowable in determining the assessable income under the act 3 the counsel for the assessee contended before us that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Premier Cotton Spinning Mills Ltd.
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-10-1980
Reported in : (1981)20CTR(Ker)357; [1981]128ITR694(Ker)
the chapter as it was originally introduced then contained only sections 80a to 80e and those provisions did not cover the the provisions of section 64 of that act section 80a 3 provides that where a deduction has been allowed under new and the assessment to surtax was finalised accordingly 4 the commissioner of income tax acting in exercise of the power vested in its total income as computed under the income tax act its capital shall be the sum ascertained in accordance with
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Kunhahammad Haji Vs. the Special Tahsildar (L.A.) Pazhassi Project, ...
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-21-1980
Reported in : AIR1980Ker205
in my view perfectly valid service for the purpose at section 49 5 but shri nayanar submits that section 9 is time 10 the o p is accordingly dismissed no costs 3 9 and 12 as well as rule 3 had been section 9 2 and 3 or section 12 of the act was received by him he filed the application under section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Appa and anr. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-16-1980
Reported in : AIR1981Ker49
purchase of right title and interest of the landlord invoking section 72b of the kerala land reforms act 1963 the land the appellate authority on 6 6 1980 in these proceedings 3 the question raised by the office is whether each of the landlord invoking section 72b of the kerala land reforms act 1963 the land tribunal dismissed o a no 496 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kerala State Industrial Development Cor ...
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jun-17-1980
Reported in : [1981]128ITR742(Ker)
of which the ito could validly initiate the proceedings under section 147 b in the light of the said decision we order dated 26th april 1977 in i t a no 355 coch 1974 75 whether on the facts and in the this court under section 256 1 of the i t act 1961 for short the act the following question of law
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP.M. Kunhimuhammed and Bros. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Nov-14-1980
Reported in : [1985]152ITR691(Ker)
act as it then stood to exercise the power under section 271 1 c in relation to the assessee in this under other sources should be reduced to rs 14 000 3 penalty proceedings were initiated by the ito on march 29 act the following question of law whether the inspecting assistant commissioner had jurisdiction to impose the penalty in question under section 1 of the i t act 1961 for short the act the following question of law whether the inspecting assistant commissioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR. Achutha Shenoi Vs. Land Tribunal, Alwaye and ors.
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Aug-05-1980
Reported in : AIR1980Ker163
control court was taken away only by the amendment of section 125 of the kerala land reforms act 1963 by act in appeal and revision as regards the status of the 3rd respondent as a tenant is not open to any further section 125 of the kerala land reforms act 1963 by act 17 of 1972 which came into effect on 2 11
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.A. Vasumathi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Mar-03-1980
Reported in : (1980)16CTR(Ker)381; [1980]123ITR94(Ker)
contends that the expenditure to come within the meaning of section 48 of the i t act should have been incurred has to be determined by the commissioner 9 ex p 3 is unsustainable in so far as the commissioner held that is a matter which has to be determined by the commissioner 9 ex p 3 is unsustainable in so far as reference is made under section 20 of the land acquisition act the litigation which results therefrom is a proceeding intimately and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT