Skip to content


Scripts - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: scripts Sorted by: recent Year: 1957 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.004 seconds)
Sep 25 1957 (HC)

Liladhar Ratanlal Vyas Vs. Holkarmal Sohanlal and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-25-1957

Reported in: AIR1959Bom528; (1958)60BOMLR203; ILR1959Bom29

..... that the account books of the partnership are written in the punjabi script that he does not known the script and that the defendants should be asked to life translations or transliterations .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 1957 (SC)

Virendra Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-06-1957

Reported in: AIR1957SC896; [1958]1SCR308

..... of the united punjab it is a daily newspaper printed in the urdu language and script since the partition of the country the daily pratap is being published simultaneously from jullundur .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 1957 (HC)

Onkarmal Agarwalla and ors. Vs. Bireswar Hazra and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-02-1957

Reported in: AIR1959Cal195,61CWN970

..... regard to mining rights the recital in the original is as follows transliteration in devanagari script ekstk miflfk vks fueulfk kkrq ksokbz dks ykvk islrksjknh ts dks kq vkdj vkls orhkfc .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 12 1957 (HC)

Ciba Ltd. Vs. M. Ramalingam and S. Subramaniam Trading in the Name of ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-12-1957

Reported in: AIR1958Bom56; (1957)59BOMLR548; ILR1957Bom702

..... first applied for registration they had also used the word in tamil character in devnagiri script and what is stated is that both in tamil and in devnagiri the word used .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 18 1957 (HC)

Mahadeo Ramchandra Vs. Damodar Vishwanath and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-18-1957

Reported in: AIR1957Bom218; (1957)59BOMLR478; ILR1958Bom21

..... the second defendant was validly in possession of the documents and scripts of which the possession was demanded by the plaintiffs 5 the ..... was not entitled to ask for possession of the documents and scripts which were handed over by the first defendant to the second ..... the second defendant was validly in possession of the documents and scripts of which the possession was demanded by the plaintiffs 6 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //