Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders amendment act 2002 section 3 amendment of scheduled castes ordre Sorted by: recent Page 4 of about 1,156 results (0.441 seconds)

May 28 2008 (HC)

Sanjay Sukhadia Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(4)Raj3188

..... the weaker section of the society, the state government went on allotting the valuable granite mining area without reservation of plots for the members of scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other backward classes. learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in fact, the whole of the area containing the granite has been ..... bhati, learned counsel appearing for the state says that the government is in the process of delineating and demarcating the plots for the persons belonging to scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other backward classes in accordance with granite policy, 2002.23. in view of this specific stand of the state government, the division ..... and ors.(a) respondent be restrained from granting any mining lease without giving effect to the provisions in respect of reservations including the one for scheduled caste/scheduled tribe.(b) in the meanwhile, the respondents be directed to give mining lease in the already delineated and notified areas in the village khambi which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2007 (HC)

Anoop Kumar Niranjan Son of Sri Siya Ram Niranjan Vs. State of U.P. Th ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1744; [2007(115)FLR489]

..... and allotment on these seats may change as per govt. order.3. category-wise distribution of seats will be as per u.p. public service scheduled castes, schedule tribes and other back ward class reservation amendment ordinance, 2002.4. 3% seats are reserved for physically handicapped category candidates as per norms laid down ..... seats are reserved for candidates with disabilities, the candidates selected against these reserved seats will be placed against respective categories, i.e., if he belongs to scheduled caste category, he will be placed in that quota and adjusted against that category. similarly if a candidate with disabilities belonging to general category, he will ..... will be identified for physically handicapped quota after imposing roster as per rules. five seats in general category, two in other backward classes category in scheduled caste category of physically handicapped were identified out of total 351 seats available for md/ms/diploma courses. however out of 12 md seats no seat .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2007 (SC)

Shree Surat Valsad Jilla K.M.G. Parishad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC2056; (2007)2GLR2234; 2007(7)SCALE21; (2007)5SCC360

..... but are used in the sense of the definitions contained in articles 366(24) and 366(25). 9. the constitution provides for declaration of certain castes and tribes as scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in terms of articles 341 and 342 of the constitution of india. the object of the said provisions is to provide for grant of ..... protection to the backward class of citizens who are specified in the scheduled castes order and scheduled tribes order having regard to the economic and educationally backwardness wherefrom they suffer. the president of india alone in terms of article 341(1) of the ..... constitution of india is authorized to issue an appropriate notification therefore. the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950 made in terms of article 341(1) is exhaustive.it is, therefore, not for the court to render its opinion as to whether the president .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 2007 (HC)

Balu Dada Gabhale Vs. Zilla Parishad, Through the Chief Executive Offi ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR673

..... education, free of cost, to children but also to supply uniforms, etc., to the deserving poor students. the government passed its resolution with an intention that presence of students of scheduled castes and tribes, nomadic tribes and denotified tribes in classes of standards 1 to 4 in primary schools under zilla parishad of the state should increase and absence should reduce. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2006 (HC)

Bairagi Charan NuaIn Vs. Gokula Suna and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 103(2007)CLT209

..... petitioner as void and also declaring casual vacancy to the office of sarpanch, lachhipur grama panchayat.9. learned counsel for the petitioner has produced the constitution (scheduled castes) orders (second amendment) act 2002 which was published in the official gazette by the ministry of law and justice dated 18.12.2002. after receiving ..... written objection before the election officer challenging the validity of nomination papers filed by the petitioner with the allegation that he was not a person belonging to scheduled castes community. but the election officer did not accept the same and accepted the nomination papers of the petitioner. thereafter, the election was held and the petitioner ..... a casual vacancy to the said office.2. the brief facts of the case are that the seat of sarpanch, lachhipur grama panchayat was reserved for scheduled castes category in the last election held in the year 2002. the petitioner as well as opposite party no. 1 both filed their nomination papers before .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2005 (HC)

Madhavi Vs. State Election Commission

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(3)KLT275

..... petition and it was accordingly dismissed. however, it was made clear that the petitioner would be at liberty to approach the appropriate authority under the kerala scheduled castes and scheduled tribes regulation of issue of community certificate act, 1996 (act 11 of 1996) and challenge the correctness of the certificate issued to respondent no. 2. ..... in that view of the matter, the contention of the petitioner that respondent no. 2 was not qualified to contest the election from a constituency reserved for scheduled castes is liable to be accepted.therefore, the writ petition is allowed. respondent no. 2 shall vacate the office of the councillor from ward no. 22 of ..... the office of the municipal councillor from ward no. 22 of kozhikode corporation as she is not qualified to be elected in the reserved constituency for scheduled castes'.2. a brief reference to the chequered history of this litigation is necessary to consider the question whether the petitioner is entitled to get the relief .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2004 (HC)

Vijay Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2005All181; 2005(1)AWC811

..... court the judgments relied upon by the petitioners referred to above have not noticed the constitutional provisions which regulate declaration of the particular caste as scheduled caste/scheduled tribe, as also the judgments of the hon'ble supreme court squarely applicable on the subject and as such are per incuriam. the ..... powers under articles 341(1) and 342(2), the president of india has issued constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950, which has been amended from time to time by the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act, namely scheduled castes and scheduled tribes orders (amendment) act no. 63 of 1956, act no. 108 of 1976, act ..... orders dated 12th may, 1961 and 26th march, 1962, the petitioners (members of the bhar community) claim that they have been treated as scheduled caste/ scheduled tribe and have been provided benefits of reservation accordingly. it is further alleged that the aforesaid notifications were subject matter of considerations before this court .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 2004 (HC)

Hardial and ors. Vs. the Commissioner and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)137PLR825

..... duty on the state to promote with special care, the educational and economic interest of the weaker sections of the people and in particular of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and to protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitations.2. article 31-c, which was inserted by the constitution (twenty-fifth ..... that even after 54 years of coming into force of the constitution, dis-advantageous and down-trodden groups of people in general and members of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and backward classes in particular are exploited with impunity by the haves of the society.4. i have prefaced the disposal of these petitions ..... and 20(8-0) situated in village thanda bhagana, tehsil phagwara, distt. kapurthala was sold by restricted auction to one banta ram, who was a member of scheduled caste and other similarly situated persons in accordance with the provisions of punjab package deal properties (disposal) rules, 1962 (for short 'the 1962 rules'). at the time .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 2003 (HC)

Smt. Suman Verma and ors. Vs. Special Secretary, Nagar Vikash Anubhag- ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1247; (2002)1UPLBEC787

..... adopted and the petitioners selected by following rules of reservations were offered appointments. dr. padia submits that suman verma. shiv shanker singh and dharmendra singh belongs to lodhi (vimukta) caste which is scheduled tribes in district fatehpur. sri ashok kumar, mohd. suaib and arvind kumar belong to backward classes. sri ashok kumar, arvind kumar and mohd. affaq akhtar belong to nai, kumbhar ..... and muslim castes which are backward classes and thus the quota of reservation was followed. he further submits that sub-section (1b) of section 34 read with sub-section (4) of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2003 (HC)

Ranjit Alias Rajat Kumar Das and ors. Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2003(II)OLR65

..... then the intention of the legislature drafting the rules, and the statutory provisions made to curb the increasing number of oppression on the people belonging to the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, would be frustrated.10. it is well settled that where a power is given to do a certain thing in a certain manner, the thing must ..... taking cognizance against them mainly on the ground that the investigation of the case had not been done in accordance with rule 7 of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) rules, 1995 ('the rules' in short). the learned s.d.j.m. by the impugned order has rejected the said application ..... have been committed by the petitioners under sections 341/323/294/506/34 of the indian penal code ('i.p.c in short) and section 3 of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act. 1989 (hereinafter called the 'act').2. the petitioners in the aforesaid g.r.case filed an application to recall the order .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //