Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 99 general rule as to evidence Sorted by: old Court: patna Page 1 of about 1 results (0.103 seconds)

Mar 19 1993 (HC)

Prem Shankar Sharma Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... of india (uoi) .(5) keeping the above principles in view, let us now examine the case on hand. the company is a company incorporated under indian companies act, as already stated, ms dutta has produced memorandum and articles of association. the company has its memorandum and articles of association. the company is governed by its memorandum ..... the statue or statutory rule. the service condition of the petitioner was also governed by article 311 of the constitution of india or by the provisions of the industrial disputes act.he placed reliance on the following decisions of the hon'ble supreme court of india, namely, (i) praga tools corporation v. c.v. jmanual : (1969)iillj479sc ..... to by the company on 19-7-1987 to the board for industrial and financial reconstruction contisuted under the provisions of the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985, and on 28-6-1989 it was decided that the darbhanga unit of the company should be acquired by the government of bihar and the assam .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1995 (HC)

State Bank of India Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

..... respondent no. 4 automatically came to an end on completionof the tenure.12. according to the appellant, the proviso to section 25ni(a) of the industrial disputes act as was existing stipulated that the benefit of the said section is not available to persons whose services have been terminated, being fixed term appointment.13. at this ..... . they are as follows:-(i) the appointment of respondent no. 4 waspurely temporary, for fixed term, liable to beterminated on expiry of tenure, thereby provision ofindustrial disputes act, as was existed in the year1965, was not applicable; ;(ii) there is a delay of 16 to 17 years in making reference, thereby the reference should have ..... october 29, 1982. it has been stated by the appellant-bank that earlier the central government refused to make a reference under section 10 of the industrial disputes act, vide their order dated july 21, 1982 on the ground of delay. it was only thereafter on persuasion by the general secretary of the staff association, again .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 1996 (HC)

Security and Intelligence Services (India) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Central C ...

Court : Patna

..... decision, taken in the fulfillment of that policy is fair. it is only concerned with the manner in which those decisions have been taken. the extent of the duty to act fairly will vary from case to case. shortly put, the grounds upon which an administrative action is subject to control by judicial review can be classified as under: (i) illegality ..... under the contract as per wage formula promulgated by the d.g.r. and such wage structure has been evolved keeping in view the provisions of minimum wages act and also variable dearness allowance act etc. it is in this context that proposal for sponsoring the ex-servicemen security agencies was insisted in those two office memoranda. copies of both the aforesaid .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 1996 (HC)

Nand Kumar and Brothers and anr. Vs. Ram Prasad Rajak

Court : Patna

..... district judge, giridih, who reversed the judgment and findings of the munsif and decreed the suit. hence, this revision petition under section 14(8) of the b.b.c. act.7. on factual aspect, it should be mentioned that before the learned munsif, a prayer was made by the defendant-petitioner under section 10 of the cpc for stay of ..... between the plaintiff and his another tenant, harish chandra bagga was a manufactured an fabricated one and the same is hit by section 4 of the b.b.c. act as there was enhancement of rent by agreement and that undertaking of vacating the premises by harish chandra bagga was only a myth in collusion with the plaintiff for ..... jolly textiles. admittedly, the petitioner was inducted as a tenant on monthly rental and the suit has been filed under section 11 (1)(c) of the b.b.c. act on the ground of personal requirement/necessary. such necessity was elaborately stated in the plaint in paragraphs-3 to 6. shortly speaking the necessity were there fold, namely, expansion of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1997 (TRI)

A.K. Mishra Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Patna

Reported in : (1998)64ITD37(Pat.)

..... 12. i have carefully considered the facts concerning the issue. the 'appellate tribunal' is a judicial body exercising judicial powers under the statute, viz., the it act, 1961. therefore, whether it does, must be done within the limits of its jurisdiction and in consonance with sound judicial principles, the oft quoted maxim ..... representatives or the assessing officer. according to him, the condemnation of the conduct of the departmental officers and observations regarding imposition of penalty under the it act, initiating proceedings under the indian penal code as and the ccs (conduct) rules, 1964 and making entries in their annual confidential character report/service ..... and important facts commencing from the filing of the original return till the completion of the reassessment proceedings pursuant to notice under section 148 of the act. the assessment records were, therefore, directed to be produced for examination and verification of true facts. but as recorded by me earlier elsewhere .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 1998 (HC)

L. Angad Kumar and anr. Vs. Bihar State Road Transport Corporation and ...

Court : Patna

..... phased manner as has been illustrated in the following paragraphs:clause 6.7 : - the committee also recommends that the state government may give a direction under section 34 of the act to the corporation that all salaries and other allowances of its staff shall remain frozen for 5 years after which the position will be reviewed. if the situation so warrants .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1999 (HC)

Gaya Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... officer. it is stated that the presiding officer had named the accused-persons on some other information that accounts for the delay. .there is evidence of caste rivalry. bal govind singh, satyanarain singh, munna singh and ram lakhan singh belong to one case, who were supporters of alakh singh. appellant mahendra singh was injured in the same ..... by ram brichh sharma in which charge-sheet had been submitted. according to the counter-version, mahendra singh appellant no. 2 was going to the booth to act as polling agent and there was firing from the booth. this is to be noticed that according to the first information report the appellants are alleged to have ..... of 1980. all the appellants except appellant no. 1 gaya singh have been convicted under sections 302 and 148 of the indian penal code and section 27, arms act. all the appellants have been sentenced to imprisonment for life under sections 302/149 indian penal code and three years under section 148, indian penal code, appellant no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 2000 (HC)

Daya Nand Sahay Vs. Kapil Sibal and ors.

Court : Patna

..... is not otherwise disqualified. inother words those informations relate to theproof of the required qualifications...... fromthe combined reading of sections 33 and 36 (of the act of 1951) it is clear that a misdescription as to electoral roll number of the candidate or of the proposer in the nomination paper is not ..... candidate should possess all the prescribed qualifications and that he should not have incurred any of the disqualifications mentioned either in the constitution or in the act, the other information required to be given in the nomination paper is only tosatisfy the returning officer that the candidate possesses the prescribed qualificationand that he ..... address. it is contended that there is definite purpose and object to electoral rolls published with reference to the provisions of the representation of the people act, 1951 and the nomination paper was duly filled in consistent with the particulars reflected in the electoral roll. the purpose of scrutiny is to identify the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2000 (HC)

The Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

..... law, and the parties are relevated to the newly-created forums. for example, section 4(1)(c) of the bihar consolidation of holding and prevention of fragmentation act, 1956 (bihar act 22 of 1956), provides that during the period commencing from the date of publication of the notification under section 3 to the date when the scheme of consolidation ..... a writ petition. all refund claims except those mentioned under proposition (iii) below have to be and must be filed and adjudicated under the provisions of the act. the act provides a complete mechanism for correcting any errors whether of fact or law and that not only an appeal is provided to a tribunal which is not a departmental ..... remand order of s.b. sinha, j.18. having considered the rival submissions, i am of the view that in view of the amendments made in the act by central act no. 40 of 1991, and the judgments cited by the respondents, the suits and consequently these appeals fail on the ground of maintainability and abate on account of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2001 (HC)

Dinanath Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... his transferors as party respondents.8. in the case of gokul mahto' (supra), the hon'ble supreme court considered the provisions of sections 16, 17 and 18 of the act and has come to the conclusion that sub-clause (3) of section 16 cannot be applied to cases of gift. in that case the supreme court noticed that the ..... . 5 filed two separate petitions for pre-emption under section 16(3) of the bihar land reforms (fixation of ceiling area and acquisition of surplus land) act (hereinafter to be referred as 'the act') contending, inter alia, that being ad-joining raiyat of certain lands in question, he was entitled for pre-emption. these two application gave rise to ceiling ..... the deed of gift was made before 90 days, therefore, the same was hit by the provisions of the act. learned counsel for respondent no. 5 has failed to draw the attention of the court to any provision of the act, which restrains the purchaser to transfer his purchased land by gift before 90 days.on the contrary, sub-section .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //