Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
..... 1969) 2 scc 43, the hon'ble supreme court has held as under: the jurisdiction which is granted to industrial tribunals by the industrial disputes act is not the jurisdiction of merely administering the existing laws and enforcing existing contracts and the industrial tribunal have the right even to vary contracts of ..... and procurement process including the price at which the distribution licensee procures power from the generating companies. under section 86(1)(e) of the electricity act, 2003, the state commission has to promote generation of electricity from renewable sources of energy. 16. national electricity policy envisages exploitation of feasible potential of ..... state commission even after it has determined tariff has the power to re-determine the same as provided under section 62(4) of the electricity act, 2003. the state commission also has the power to regulate electricity purchase and procurement process of distribution licensees including the price at which electricity shall .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
..... distribution licensees. the argument is reasonable. 47. the regulatory commission by virtue of the powers conferred upon it under section 62(3) of the electricity act, 2003 can fix different tariffs for different class of consumers basing on various technical/ economic/ geographical factors. further, the geographical and economic factors of ..... of tariff on the basis of cost of supply of each category even though the state advisory committee constituted under section 87 of the electricity act, 2003 has also advised the oerc to adopt a preferential lower tariff for low tension (lt) consumers like domestic consumers, small commercial establishments and ..... distribution licensees. the first respondent is the odisha electricity regulatory commission (commission). 3. these appeals have been filed under section 111 of the electricity act, 2003 against the order dated 21.1.2012 passed by the odisha electricity regulatory commission (hereinafter referred to as the commission) in the remand proceedings .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
..... transmission system has been entrusted to central transmission utility or state transmission utility, as the case may be, under sections 38 and 39 of the act. transmission licensee is responsible for building, maintaining and operation of transmission lines. transmission licensee does not carryout the planning aspect. it is for the ..... an efficient, co-ordinated and economical distribution system in his area of supply and to supply electricity in accordance with the provisions contained in this act. 82. it is strenuously contended by the appellants that while the transmission licensee is authorised to establish and build transmission lines (section 40) and ..... may under the provisions of regulation 21 of the merc distribution open access regulations, 2005, section 86(1)(a) and 86(1)(f) of electricity act, 2003 consider the submissions made above and provide appropriate directives and guidelines for resolving the issues highlighted above . prayers: it is therefore most respectfully prayed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
..... appellant is to be considered as a captive generation plant. 11. the central government in exercise of powers conferred under section 176 of the electricity act, 2003 (act 36 of 2003) has made rules called the electricity rules, 2005). rule 3 of the rules of 2005 lays down the requirements of captive generating ..... companies are to be treated as captive consumption by jsw steel itself. but the jpocl and boc india limited are independent companies, incorporated under the companies act having their own identities. hence, electricity consumption by these two companies cannot be considered as consumption of jsw steel limited itself, though jsw steel provides facilities ..... with jsw steel which is not making any revenue or profit whatsoever on the power supply. c) the liberalization of the captive generation under the electricity act, 2003 was because of the inability of the distribution licensee to meet the growing demand of electricity, particularly, for industrial requirements and, therefore, the .....
Tag this Judgment!