Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 98 voting by members Court: us supreme court Page 1 of about 288 results (0.194 seconds)

Bondu Ramaswamy Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of lands for formation of arkavathi layout on the outskirts of bangalore by the bangalore development authority [for short `bda'] under the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (`bda act' or `act' for short).2. on 2.1.2001 the executive engineer (north) of bda submitted a scheme report with detailed estimates for formation of a ..... the said city. section 503a relating to preparation of a development plan and section 503b relating to constitution of metropolitan planning committees, inserted in kmc act by amendment act 35 of 1994 are extracted below:503-a. preparation of development plan: every corporation shall prepare every year a development plan and submit to the ..... it can co-exist and operate without repugnancy to the provisions of the existing law. this court in munithimmiah (supra) has held that the bda act is an act to provide for the establishment of a development authority to facilitate and ensure planned growth and development of the city of bangalore and areas adjacent thereto .....

Vodafone International Holdings B.V. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... said section could be triggered only if it can be established that the payment under consideration is of a sum chargeable under the income tax act (for short it act). senior counsel therefore contended that the findings of the tax authorities that pursuant to the transaction the benefit of telecom licence stood transferred to ..... to state that on 31.05.2010, an order was passed by the department under sections 201(1) and 201(1a) of the income tax act, 1961 [the act for short] declaring that indian tax authorities had jurisdiction to tax the transaction against which vih filed writ petition no. 1325 of 2010 before the ..... its shareholding being acquired by an indian company called smms investments private limited (smms). smms was also a joint venture company formed by india development fund (idf) acting through idfc private equity company (idfcpe), infrastructure development finance company limited (idfc) and sski corporate finance pvt. ltd. (sski) all the three companies were incorporated .....

Chatterjee Petrochem (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and intentions of the chatterjee group in managing the company and inducting funds as necessary for the growth and development thereof. mr. venugopal submitted that the acts of oppression alleged by the chatterjee group and the relief claimed by them, apart from being based on alleged breach of contract, aimed at invoking the ..... india) holding ltd. & ors. [(1981) 3 scc 333], mr. nariman submitted that in determining a question of oppression under section 397 of the companies act, the company law board was entitled to take into account facts which had come into existence after the company petition had been filed. learned counsel gave several instances ..... administration of the company except with the previous approval of the petitioner; i) permanent injunction restraining the respondents and each of them from in any manner acting in derogation of the petitioner's rights as majority shareholders in the company and the petitioner's right to control the management of the company, including .....

Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 10, 1964 by a notification of governor in the bihar minor mineral concession rules, 1964 were in issue. the court referred to the government of india act, 1935, 1948 act and 1957 act in light of entry 54 of list i and entry 23 of list ii and the earlier decisions in hingir-rampur coal co. ltd.a and m ..... declaration under section 2 thereof. the ownership of the mines vests in the state of jharkhand in view of the declaration under the provisions of bihar land reforms act, 1950 which act is protected by placing it in the ninth schedule added by the first amendment to the constitution. while speaking for the constitution bench in waman rao (supra) ..... their legislative competence. by the presence of expression to the extent hereinafter provided in section 2, the union has assumed control to the extent provided in 1957 act. 1957 act prescribes the extent of control and specifies it. we must bear in mind that as the declaration made in section 2 trenches upon the state legislative power, it .....

Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab Alias Abu Mujahid and Others Vs. St ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2012)9SCC1; JT2012(8)SC4; 2012(4)KCCR271(SN); 2012AIRSCW4942; AIR2012SC3565; 2012(7)SCALE553

..... is by no means clear, much less transparent. it is often a difference in degree. the distinction gets thinner if a comparison is made of terrorist acts with the acts aimed at overawing the government by means of criminal force. conspiracy to commit the latter offence is covered by section 121-a.550. this answers mr. ..... or any vital establishment of the state or any important functionaries of the state. the intent to weaken or terrorize the state may render such an act a terrorist act but it would still not satisfy the ingredients of section 121 of the penal code. the learned counsel went on to contend that, in any event ..... planned and everyone was given clear instructions as to what they were supposed to do at their respective targets. all the terrorists, including the appellant, actually acted according to the previous planning. a channel of communication between the attacking terrorists and their handlers and collaborators from across the border, based on advanced computer technology .....

Smt. Selvi and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... a fundamental right guaranteed by part iii.179. ayyangar, j. distinguished between surveillance activities conducted in the routine exercise of police powers and the specific act of unauthorised intrusion into a person's home which violated `personal liberty'. however, the minority opinion (subba rao, j.) in kharak singh took a ..... cases which could expose parties to adverse consequences. furthermore, questions have also been asked about the scope of the privilege being restricted to testimonial acts while excluding physical evidence which can be extracted through compulsion.98. in response to john wigmore's thesis about the separate foundations of the `rule ..... reasonably reach differing conclusions as to whether polygraph evidence should be admitted. we cannot say, then, that presented with such widespread uncertainty, the president acted arbitrarily or disproportionately in promulgating a per se rule excluding all polygraph evidence.34. since a trial by jury is an essential feature of the .....

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534

..... grant relief to persons belonging to socially oppressed castes and minorities.172. the amendment to article 15 by inserting article 15(5) and the new act (act 5 of 2007) are to be viewed in the background of these constitutional provisions. it may also be recalled that the preamble to the constitution ..... applicable to principles of reservation or other affirmative action contemplated under article 15(5) of the constitution of india 164. based on the ninety-third constitutional amendment act, act 5 of 2007 has been enacted. according to the petitioner's counsel, this is a 'suspect legislation' and therefore, it is to be subjected to ..... government or institutions maintained by or receiving aid from the central government or educational institutions set up by the central government under the societies registration act, 1860. act 5 of 2007 is not intended to provide reservation in 'private unaided' educational institutions. none of the private unaided educational institutions have filed petitions .....

Regu Mahesh @ Regu Maheswar Rao Vs. Rajendra Pratap Bhanj Dev and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC38; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)322; JT2003(8)SC225; (2004)1SCC46

..... date and place of commission of such practice has to be indicated. though allegation of fraud etc. in obtaining false caste certificate have serious implications, under the act and particularly as the language of section 123(3) specifies and enumerates they do not per se constitute corrupt practice. the fact that a candidates obtains a ..... the ground of caste.7. respective stands need careful consideration. before we deal with the basic issues, it would be appropriate to quote few provisions from the act:'section 81 presentation of petitions-(1) an election petition calling in question any election may be presented on one or more of the grounds specified in sub-section ..... source of information if any. the petition which does not contain a proper verification is not an election petition in terms of section 83(1) of the act. there was no cause of action indicated. the pleadings clearly show allegations of corrupt practices in terms of section 123(3). particular reference is made to paragraph .....

Union Of India Vs. Dilip Paul

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of the grievances redressal mechanism relating to sexual harassment at workplace. the 2006 standing order is reproduced below: - page 49 of 104 directorate general, sashastra seema bal (ssb), r.k. puram, new delhi-110066 2006 standing order12006 sub: grievances redressal mechanism : to redress grievances of women / sexual harassment at work ..... on hyper-technical interpretations of the applicable service rules. for instance, the sexual harassment of women at workplace (prevention, prohibition, and redressal) act 2013 penalizes several misconducts of a sexual nature and imposes a mandate on all public and private organizations to create adequate mechanisms for redressal. however, ..... (c) as regards private employers steps should be taken to include the aforesaid prohibitions in the standing orders under the industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946. (d) appropriate work conditions should be provided in respect of work, leisure, health and hygiene to further ensure that there is no .....

Arun Kumar Jagatramka Vs. Jindal Steel And Power Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... code. 4.7 given the incompatibility of schemes of arrangement and the liquidation process, the committee recommended that recourse to section 230 of the companies act, 2013 for effecting schemes of arrangement or compromise should not be available during liquidation of the corporate debtor under the code. however, the committee ..... 29a has been enacted in the larger public interest and to facilitate effective corporate governance . the court further observed that parliament rectified a loophole in the act which allowed backdoor entry to erstwhile managements in the cirp . arcelormittal 32 49 in arcelormittal india private limited v. satish kumar gupta & ors. , ..... on public interest in facilitating economic growth by balancing diverse stakeholder interests. third, the ibc attributes a primacy to the business decisions taken by creditors acting as a collective body, on the premise that the timely resolution of corporate insolvency is necessary to ensure the growth of credit markets and encourage .....