Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 98 voting by members Court: karnataka Page 4 of about 975 results (0.094 seconds)

Nov 20 2015 (HC)

Ranganatha S/O Late c.r Swamy Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... and gold rings at the time of his marriage at gbb kalyan mantap, bengaluru, and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 3 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961?.4) whether the prosecution further proves beyond reasonable doubt that the accused being the husband of smt.nandini @ komala, daughter of complainant-ravindra, when ..... strictly construed. dowry is a fairly well known social custom or practice i india. it is well settled principle of interpretation of statute that if the act is passed without reference to a particular trade, business or transaction and words are used which everybody conversant with trade, business or transaction knows or understands ..... the conviction in respect of the offence punishable under section 304b will be essentially based on the presumption available under section 113 (b) of the evidence act and therefore, imprisonment for life should be used in rare cases and not in every case and consequently, the sentence of imprisonment for life was reduced .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. Srinivas V Vs. The Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mrs Rosamma Varghese Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Sharadamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

M/s Ferns Builders And Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Prakashnath Vs. State By Special Public Prosecutor

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. Priyadarshini Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri T Krishna Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Uma Balagavi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... effect of the facts is conclusive of the guilt, a conviction will be justified. 57097. it has been held by hon'ble apex court in seema silk sarees and another vs directorate of enforcement and others reported in (2008)5 scc580that a provision in an enactment would not become unconstitutional only because ..... aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure- ..... sri. chokka reddy, advocate for r-2) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011, the act. and quash the proceedings in l.g.c. (p) no.234 of2017in karnataka land grabbing, special court, kandaya bhavana, the special court, kandaya bhavan .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //