Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 97 oath of members judge attorneys and witnesses Court: supreme court of india Page 3 of about 31 results (1.402 seconds)

Surinder Singh Vs. Kapoor Singh (Dead) Through Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2002)10SCC109

..... with the plaintiff-respondents. under such circumstances, the only course open to the plaintiff-respondents was to take resort to sub-section (3) of section 12 of the specific relief act. the plaintiffs sought specific performance of the whole contract. in such a situation, the aid of sub-section (3) of section 12 not having been taken by the plaintiff, the ..... land, we would be setting up a new contract which cannot be enforced by the court unless the plaintiff takes resort to sub-section (3) of section 12 of the act. in the present case, there was only one contract for the entire land and what was pleaded in the plaint and enforcement of the agreement sought, was for the entire .....

Basisth Naryan Yadav Vs. Kailash Rai and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... had filed a complaint before the chief judicial magistrate, vaishali, against the accused persons under sections 498a, 494 of ipc and sections 3 and 4 of dowry prohibition act. it is the further case of the prosecution that in october, 1988, the accused persons called basisth narayan to their house and made explicit demands of a rajdoot ..... the letter her apprehension of being killed. the complaint to the chief judicial magistrate under sections 494, 498a of ipc and sections 3 and 4 of dowry prohibition act, goes on to further indicate that dowry related cruelty was committed against the deceased. the deceased was married to accused ranjit kumar on 26.06.1987 which means ..... of the marriage. we find that the three main ingredients of section 304b of ipc have been proved to trigger the presumption under section 113b of the evidence act, 1872. the death has occurred within 7 years of the marriage due to burn injuries and there were demands of dowry accompanied with the physical and mental cruelty .....

Anil Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC4299; 2004(4)AWC3037(SC); (2004)4CompLJ576(SC); JT2004(7)SC35; (2005)1PLR456; 2004(7)SCALE66; (2004)8SCC671; (2005)1UPLBEC209

..... invitation to tender is not an offer. it is an attempt to ascertain whether an offer can be obtained with a margin. [see: pollock & mulla on indian contract & specific relief acts - (2001) 12th edition. page 50].13. valuation is a question of fact. this court is reluctant to interfere where valuation is based on relevant material. [see: duncans industries ltd. v ..... this court vide order dated 28.4.2004.6. it is the case of the petitioner that respondent no. 2 is the statutory authority under u.p. industrial area development act, 1976; that it is responsible for the development of the area in terms of the master plan for noida; that it has framed building regulations w.e.f. 1.2 .....

Bhag Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC696; 2007(1)SCALE138; (2007)2SCC218

..... in question, does not fall under any duly notified controlled area, declared under the provisions of the punjab scheduled roads and controlled areas (restriction) of un-regulated development act, 1963, now repealed. thus there are no controlled area restrictions at mandi gobindgarh, in view of the above legal position.10. that the secretary, housing and urban ..... in which air pollution control devices is not required. hence, all the remaining industrial units have complied with the provisions of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981.submitted for the kind information of the hon'ble punjab and haryana high court for issue of appropriate order in the case. 3. taking note of the report ..... was filed on 8.4.2002 by the board showing that 61 units have complied with the provisions of the air (prevention & control of pollution) act, 1981. out of remaining 27 units, 16 units have been closed down by the board under section 21/31a of the air (prevention and control of pollution .....

In Re Felling Of Trees In Aarey Forest (maharashtra)

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... .2019 filed by mmrcl pending before it and pass final order thereof with respect to cutting of the 84 trees under the maharashtra (urban areas) protection and preservation of trees act 1975 located on metro car shed land at aarey colony admeasuring approximately 33 hectares for the mumbai metro line-3 project in mumbai and permit, mmrcl to implement such decision .....

Sh. Dharam Chand Vs. Chairman, Ndmc and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... scr332 stating that therein it has been held as under:- "though learned counsel for the respondent started by attempting such a justification by invoking s. 12 of the indian police act he gave this up and conceded that the regulations contained in ch. xx had no such statutory basis but were merely executive or departmental instructions framed for the guidance of ..... the high court dismissed the writ petition of the appellant. the learned single judge was of the view that under section 388(d)(5) of the new delhi municipal council act, 1994, the ndmc was empowered to impose terms and conditions while granting tehbazari rights and the letter dated 20th may, 1999 by which tehbazari/kiosk rights had been granted to .....

H.M.T. Ltd. Vs. H.M.T. Head Office Employees' Assocn. and others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1996IXAD(SC)108; AIR1997SC585; [1997(75)FLR29]; JT1996(10)SC64; 1996(7)SCALE898; (1996)11SCC319; [1996]Supp8SCR69

..... other public sector undertakings. in the case of three other public sector undertakings namely; bel, beml and hal and additional clause in the settlement was inserted. in bal the clause was 1.1 in beml, the clause was as follows:if any comparable engineering industry in the central public sector such as bhel etc., revises the ..... during the strike period. the further contention on behalf of the managements was that even after the strike had been called off, the workers had resorted to various acts of intimidation, go-slow, beating up of the willing workers who had attended factory during the strike period and the workmen also resorted to other forms of indiscipline ..... clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 22, while the strike in the other undertakings contravened sub-section (a) of section 23 of the industrial disputes act, 1947. there is also substance in the contention urged on behalf of the managements that the strike was illegal also because it was in contravention of sub-section (c) .....

Lalith Mathur Vs. L. Maheswara Rao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2000)10SCC285

..... in any public sector undertaking. this order, in our opinion, is wholly without jurisdiction and could not have been made in proceedings under the contempt of courts act or under art.215 of the constitution. 4. the high court in the writ petition had issued a direction for the consideration of the respondent's representation by ..... one satyanarayana who was a junior to the petitioner is also being continued in service by implementing the orders passed by the authority under the shops and establishments act. under these circumstances, i do not see why the petitioner herein should be denied the same consideration.for the aforesaid reasons this contempt case is disposed of ..... 1998 which has been reiterated in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is that in view of ordinance 4 of 1997 which was subsequently replaced by act 14 of 1997 and the consequential orders cancelling goms no. 329, agriculture and cooperation (coop. i) department dated 22-5-1993, the petitioner is not .....

Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2000)2SCC217

..... . union of india3.3. after considering the arguments for some time we are of the opinion that the question whether search of the person envisaged in section 50 of the act would encompass the gunny bags found inside the autorickshaw driven by the accused, so as to attract the mandatory requirements of that provision can be considered by a larger bench ..... seized by the authorities from the autorickshaw driven by the accused himself. when a plea is made on the strength of section 50 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 the focal question is whether the gunny bags were in the physical possession of the accused or not. if they were in the physical possession of the accused the .....

Punjab and Sind Bank Vs. Allahabad Bank and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2006(4)ALT18(SC); II(2006)BC271(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(4)CHN67; 2006(199)ELT3(SC); JT2006(4)SC161; (2006)143PLR283; 2006(3)SCALE557; (2006)4SCC780

..... to be the deciding factor.the respondent/plaintiff here has alleged that the punjab & sind bank (no doubt vicariously, and because of persons working of the bank) acted fraudulently, or at least negligently, and sent for clearing a cheque which was worthless, and thus brought into circulation rs. 3.10 crore which should not have ..... law. such a course is detrimental to public interest as it entails avoidable wastage of public money and time. these are all limbs of the government and must act in coordination and not confrontation. the mechanism set up by this court is not, as suggested by mr. andhyarujina, only to conciliate between government departments. it ..... to the public interest as it also entails avoidable wastage of public money and time. various departments of the government are its limbs and, therefore, they must act in co-ordination and not in confrontation, filing of a writ petition by one department against the other by invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of the high court .....