Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 97 oath of members judge attorneys and witnesses Court: jharkhand

Feb 05 2015 (HC)

Institute of Continuing Education Research and Training Through Its Se ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... , a new lease is required, while in the case of extension the same lease continues in force during additional period by the performance of the stipulate act . 17. the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the petitioner submitted application seeking renewal, the same has not been expressly rejected. the ..... of meso rural hospital. w.p.(c) no. 4526 of 2014 the petitioner research institute for civil health integration is a trust registered under the indian trust act. it has signed four separate mous on 04.02.2009 for upgradation, operation, maintenance and management of meso rural hospitals at arki, jonha, litipara and ..... 4450 of 2014 briefly stated, the petitioner institute of continuing education research and training, a non governmental organisation, is a society registered under the societies registration act, which is involved in various social welfare activities. under the meso project, for operation of the hospitals the government took a decision vide memo dated 16 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Padam Kumar Jain Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... other reasons, due to the second and subsequent applications for renewal, remaining unattended at the hands of the state government. the instant amendment to the mmdr act, introduced a uniform original grant period of fifty years, for all mining leaseholders. it also excluded renewal(s), after the expiry of the original lease period ..... the issue of allocation of natural resources which have direct relevance to the grant of mineral concessions. 50 4. the present legal framework of mmdr act, 1957, does not permit the auctioning of mineral concessions. auctioning of mineral concessions would improve transparency in allocation. government would also get an increased share ..... to resolve the plight of the mining industry and pendency of the renewal application before the state government for longer periods, has enacted the amendment act., but the benefit of extension / deemed extension cannot be construed to operate automatically without lessee conforming to the terms and conditions of the lease .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Ms Shah Brothers Through One of Its Partner Sri Raj Kumar Shah Vs. The ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... other reasons, due to the second and subsequent applications for renewal, remaining unattended at the hands of the state government. the instant amendment to the mmdr act, introduced a uniform original grant period of fifty years, for all mining leaseholders. it also excluded renewal(s), after the expiry of the original lease period ..... the issue of allocation of natural resources which have direct relevance to the grant of mineral concessions. 50 4. the present legal framework of mmdr act, 1957, does not permit the auctioning of mineral concessions. auctioning of mineral concessions would improve transparency in allocation. government would also get an increased share ..... to resolve the plight of the mining industry and pendency of the renewal application before the state government for longer periods, has enacted the amendment act., but the benefit of extension / deemed extension cannot be construed to operate automatically without lessee conforming to the terms and conditions of the lease .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Anil Khirwal Vs. The Union of India Through the Ministry of Mines and ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... other reasons, due to the second and subsequent applications for renewal, remaining unattended at the hands of the state government. the instant amendment to the mmdr act, introduced a uniform original grant period of fifty years, for all mining leaseholders. it also excluded renewal(s), after the expiry of the original lease period ..... the issue of allocation of natural resources which have direct relevance to the grant of mineral concessions. 50 4. the present legal framework of mmdr act, 1957, does not permit the auctioning of mineral concessions. auctioning of mineral concessions would improve transparency in allocation. government would also get an increased share ..... to resolve the plight of the mining industry and pendency of the renewal application before the state government for longer periods, has enacted the amendment act., but the benefit of extension / deemed extension cannot be construed to operate automatically without lessee conforming to the terms and conditions of the lease .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2015 (HC)

Yogendra Sharma ? Munna Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand Thr.C.B.I.

Court : Jharkhand

..... some accused persons, namely amarendra kumar singh, yogendra sharma @ munna sharma and kunal jena alias kunna, on the strength of section 30 of 41 indian evidence act, as it fulfilled all the mandatory requirements.68. now, it is appropriate at this juncture to appreciate the rest of the evidence adduced along with the confessional ..... bearing no. bbh-4200 seized from their house. thereafter, three seizure lists (x, x/1 and x/3) were prepared by him in presence of ashutosh bal and jagarnath modak upon which he, witnesses and the accused put their respective signature. he has added that lalit chandra biswas, in his statement recorded under section ..... bistupur p.s. case no. 346 of 1993 was registered against unknown accused persons, under section 302 read with section 120b, ipc and section 27, arms act. investigation was thereafter undertaken by the local police. however, subsequently the investigation in the said case was handed over to the special investigation team which was constituted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2015 (HC)

Kunal Jana ? Kunna Vs. State of Jharkhand Thr.C.B.I.

Court : Jharkhand

..... some accused persons, namely amarendra kumar singh, yogendra sharma @ munna sharma and kunal jena alias kunna, on the strength of section 30 of 41 indian evidence act, as it fulfilled all the mandatory requirements.68. now, it is appropriate at this juncture to appreciate the rest of the evidence adduced along with the confessional ..... bearing no. bbh-4200 seized from their house. thereafter, three seizure lists (x, x/1 and x/3) were prepared by him in presence of ashutosh bal and jagarnath modak upon which he, witnesses and the accused put their respective signature. he has added that lalit chandra biswas, in his statement recorded under section ..... bistupur p.s. case no. 346 of 1993 was registered against unknown accused persons, under section 302 read with section 120b, ipc and section 27, arms act. investigation was thereafter undertaken by the local police. however, subsequently the investigation in the said case was handed over to the special investigation team which was constituted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2015 (HC)

Lalit Chandra Biswas ? Rajiv Sen ? Raju Vs. State of Jharkhand Thr.C.B ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... some accused persons, namely amarendra kumar singh, yogendra sharma @ munna sharma and kunal jena alias kunna, on the strength of section 30 of 41 indian evidence act, as it fulfilled all the mandatory requirements.68. now, it is appropriate at this juncture to appreciate the rest of the evidence adduced along with the confessional ..... bearing no. bbh-4200 seized from their house. thereafter, three seizure lists (x, x/1 and x/3) were prepared by him in presence of ashutosh bal and jagarnath modak upon which he, witnesses and the accused put their respective signature. he has added that lalit chandra biswas, in his statement recorded under section ..... bistupur p.s. case no. 346 of 1993 was registered against unknown accused persons, under section 302 read with section 120b, ipc and section 27, arms act. investigation was thereafter undertaken by the local police. however, subsequently the investigation in the said case was handed over to the special investigation team which was constituted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2015 (HC)

Irfan Hussain Alias Md Irfan Hussain Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... 2013) registered under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120b of the indian penal code (in short i.p.c) and sections 25(1)-(b) and 26 of the arms act.2. mr. nilesh kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the aforesaid case has been instituted in course of investigation of the sikidiri p.s. case no.35 ..... of 2012 dated 09.10.2012, registered for the offence under sections 364 i.p.c and 27 of the arms act. it is submitted by the learned counsel that in the aforesaid case a pistol used by the petitioner was seized and the petitioner had produced the licence of the pistol ..... p.s. case no.328 of 2013 was registered under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120b i.p.c and sections 25(1)-(b) and 26 of the arms act. it is evident that the second f.i.r was lodged during investigation of sikidiri p.s. case no.35 of 2012 when the fact that the pistol licence was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2015 (HC)

Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Prayag Chandra Kejriwal and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... has rightly been rejected by the trial court. the plea that the reference was not made within the period of limitation under section 18 of the land acquisition act, was raised by the petitioner in earlier proceeding unsuccessfully. admittedly, the petitioner has not challenged the award on the ground of fraud, collusion, etc. i find ..... civil revision applications was challenged unsuccessfully by the petitioner before the hon'ble supreme court. the petitioner thereafter, filed application under section 53 of the land acquisition act, 1894 and under section 151 cpc challenging maintainability of the l.a. reference case no. 2/1998 arising out of l.a. case no. 195/65 ..... petition.2. the facts stated in the writ petition are briefly summarised thus : the petitioner is a government of india company registered under section 617 of the companies act, 1956. the respondents namely, prayag chandra kejriwal and santosh kumar kejriwal are plaintiffs in l.a. reference case no. 2/1998 and l.a. reference case .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2016 (HC)

Shiv Narayan Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... p.s. case no. 15/02, under sections 302/201/34 of the indian penal code and sections 3/4/5 of the prevention of witch (daain) practices act, was registered against the appellants. the police, after due investigation, submitted charge sheet. accordingly, cognizance was taken against the appellants and the case was committed to the court ..... are either relatives of the deceased or friends of the relatives. ramprit singh, pw 5; jitendra singh, pw 6; ram chandra singh, pw 8 have turned hostile, whereas, bal ram singh, pw 9; wiphan dewar, pw 10 and chaturbujh singh, pw 11 have been tendered by the prosecution. dr. kaushal sahgal, pw 7 had conducted autopsy on ..... sarhulia was recovered at the instance of appellant shiv narayan singh and therefore, leading to recovery of dead body is quite admissible under section 27 of the evidence act and the confession so made is admissible and conviction can be based on such confession.9. we have examined the case records, perused the evidences and the judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //