Court : Jharkhand
..... the service excerpt. it has further been stated that the petitioner has been superannuated on the basis of the statutory form b register maintained under section 48 of the mines act. the respondents are bound by the provisions contained in implementation instruction no.76 regarding verification of the age of the employees which can be made at two different stages namely ..... in form-b register as 03.07.1949, accordingly the notice of retirement has been issued to the petitioner for superannuation, form-b is per section 48 of the mines act, the date of birth recorded in the form-b is conclusive. therefore, there is no absolutely illegality and infirmity in the impugned retirement notice so as to call for any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... absence of any proof of force or coercion applied, the appellant has completely failed to bring his case within the contour of section 12(1)(c) of the act of 1955 for annulment of the marriage as a voidable marriage. the appellant had, on his own -4- volition and undertaking, solemnized the marriage in the background ..... for the appellant. appellant is the husband aggrieved by the dismissal of title matrimonial suit no.115/2013 instituted under section 12(1)(c) of the hindu marriage act, 1955 wherein he alleged that consent of the petitioner for marriage was obtained by force. case of the parties is briefly stated hereunder :- the appellant-husband ..... of the petitioner-appellant. therefore, the suit was instituted for dissolution of marriage under section 12(1)(c) of the hindu marriage act, 1955 and under section 25(iii) of the special marriage act, 1954. the respondent through her written statement accepted the marriage with the appellant and further stated that they were on love affair .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... of the erstwhile state of bihar and after creation of the state of jharkhand. in view of the relevant provision of sections 72 and 74 of the bihar re-organization act, 2000 as has been referred to in the decision rendered in the case of state of bihar-versus-arvind bijay billung & anr. reported in 2002 (1) j.l.j.r .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... of the erstwhile state of bihar and after creation of the state of jharkhand. in view of the relevant provision of sections 72 and 74 of the bihar re-organization act, 2000 as has been referred to in the decision rendered in the case of state of bihar-versus-arvind bijay billung & anr. reported in 2002 (1) j.l.j.r .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... construction of embankment, roads, railways, building , the same is already prescribed as minor mineral by the central government in its notification issued under section 3(e) of the act, 1957 and, hence, it is covered by entry no. 19 of the state of jharkhand s notification dated 27th december, 2010 and hence, the respondents are liable ..... s- 1. m/s. rites limited, a government of india undertaking, under the ministry of railway and a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, 1956 having its registered office at scope minar, laxmi nagar, po & ps laxmi nagar, district- delhi and corporate office at rites bhawan, 1, sector-29, po section ..... high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(c) no. 4797 of 2015 m/s. royal infraconstru ltd. a limited company duly incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956, having its corproate office at 18, r.n. mukherjee road, 6th floor, po, ps and district- kolkata (west bengal) through its authorized signatory mr. sudip .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... did not commit any illegality while ordering reinstatement of the appellants because his service was terminated in clear violation of section 25f of the industrial disputes act. in swarn singh vs. state of punjab reported in (1976) 2 scc868 the hon'ble apex court reiterated the limitation of certiorari jurisdiction indicated ..... the management has failed to establish that the concerned workman was given contractual job for a limited period and, therefore, violation of section 25f of the industrial dispute act has been occurred and, therefore, reinstatement with 25% backwages has been given.7. mr. rajiv ranjan, learned sr. counsel appearing for the management assisted by ..... but he was disengaged from service with effect from 01.03.1996. being aggrieved, the workman claimed compensation under section 25f of the industrial disputes act even though the management kept him as a temporary worker and claiming reinstatement. an industrial dispute was raised and the matter was referred by the central .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... did not commit any illegality while ordering reinstatement of the appellants because his service was terminated in clear violation of section 25f of the industrial disputes act. in swarn singh vs. state of punjab reported in (1976) 2 scc868 the hon'ble apex court reiterated the limitation of certiorari jurisdiction indicated ..... the management has failed to establish that the concerned workman was given contractual job for a limited period and, therefore, violation of section 25f of the industrial dispute act has been occurred and, therefore, reinstatement with 25% backwages has been given.7. mr. rajiv ranjan, learned sr. counsel appearing for the management assisted by ..... but he was disengaged from service with effect from 01.03.1996. being aggrieved, the workman claimed compensation under section 25f of the industrial disputes act even though the management kept him as a temporary worker and claiming reinstatement. an industrial dispute was raised and the matter was referred by the central .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... service, unless of course the rules under which he is appointed expressly provide for such a result. therefore even though a probationer may have continued to act in the post to which he is appointed on probation for more than the initial period of probation, he cannot become a permanent servant merely because of ..... . the chief manager (personnel), samadhan cell, hq central coalfields limited, darbhanga house, ranchi, p.o. kuchari, p.s. kotwali, district ranchi. ........respondents coram: hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble mr. justice amitav k. gupta for the appellant : m/s amit kumar das, pooja kumari, advocates for respondent no.1 : mr. bishambhar shastri, advocate ..... a. no. 7066 of 2017 with i.a. no. 7064 of 2017 with i.a. no. 7691 of 2017 central coalfields limited, a company incorporated under the companies act, having its registered office at darbhanga house, p.o. ranchi university, p.s. kotwali, district ranchi (jharkhand), through its hod (personnel (admn) sri sanjay kumar, son .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... case registered under sections 120b, 419, 420, 467, 468 & 471 of the indian penal code and section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act. the case of the prosecution is that one niraj raja singh, chief manager, state bank of india, sme branch, city centre, sector-iv, bokaro steel city, bokaro, duly authorized by ..... as such the matter was transferred to stressed assets management branch (samb), patna for hard recovery measures. it is further alleged that notices under section 13(2) of the sarfaesi act, 2002 was issued on 27.12.2011 and possession notice under section 13(4) was issued on 09.08.2012 and the same was challenged by the unit before the ..... 120b read with sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the i.p.c and section 13(2) read with section 13(1)9d) of the prevention of corruption act, so petitioner deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail. learned standing counsel on behalf of the c.b.i has appeared and filed the counter affidavit and it has been stated .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... case registered under sections 120b, 419, 420, 467, 468 & 471 of the indian penal code and section 13(2) read with section 13(1) (d) of the prevention of corruption act. the case of the prosecution is that one niraj raja singh, chief manager, state bank of india, sme branch, city centre, sector-iv, bokaro steel city, bokaro, duly authorized by ..... as such the matter was transferred to stressed assets management branch (samb), patna for hard recovery measures. it is further alleged that notices under section 13(2) of the sarfaesi act, 2002 was issued on 27.12.2011 and possession notice under section 13(4) was issued on 09.08.2012 and the same was challenged by the company before the ..... 120b read with sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the i.p.c and section 13(2) read with section 13(1)9d) of the prevention of corruption act, so petitioner deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail. learned standing counsel on behalf of the c.b.i has appeared and filed the counter affidavit and it has been stated .....
Tag this Judgment!