Court : Delhi
..... 9811149379 was used by his wife i.e. appellant/mahima dewan. the prosecution has been able to bring on record that mobile no.9999294987 was issued in the name of seema, mother of appellant/runeet gulati. dw-4 during cross examination deposed that "accused runeet gulati was carrying his mobile phone having mobile no.9999297987 during stay at my home ..... crl.a. 1175/2018 & other connected matters page 151 of 159 to such agreement says that when two or more persons agree or cause to be done an illegal act or an act, which is not illegal by illegal means, such an agreement is designated a "criminal conspiracy". it then provides an exception to the effect that no agreement except an ..... must relate to doing or causing to be done either crl.a. 1175/2018 & other connected matters page 142 of 159 joshi v. state jagdish (a) an illegal act; (b) an act which is not illegal in itself but is done by illegal means. it is now, however, well settled that a conspiracy ordinarily is hatched in secrecy. the court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... of the victim nor the school authorities reported the matter to the police and technically are liable for prosecution u/s 21 of pocso act. this delay has not been explained by the prosecution. though the mother of the victim claimed that she was under threat from her in ..... 2019 crl.l.p. 353/2019 & crl.l.p.418/2019 page 1 of 11 1. the present application under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963, filed on behalf of the petitioner, seeks condonation of delay of 63 days in filing the leave petition.2. issue notice.3. mr. ..... and pushpa madaan, the respondents of charges framed against them, for commission of offences punishable under section 6 pocso act read with section 5 (m) and (p) of the said act against the former, and for offences under section 21 pocso crl.l.p. 353/2019 & crl.l.p. ..... 418/2019 page 2 of 11 act read with section 506 indian penal code against the latter. in a nutshell, the facts of the case as elaborated by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... of the victim nor the school authorities reported the matter to the police and technically are liable for prosecution u/s 21 of pocso act. this delay has not been explained by the prosecution. though the mother of the victim claimed that she was under threat from her in ..... 2019 crl.l.p. 353/2019 & crl.l.p.418/2019 page 1 of 11 1. the present application under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963, filed on behalf of the petitioner, seeks condonation of delay of 63 days in filing the leave petition.2. issue notice.3. mr. ..... and pushpa madaan, the respondents of charges framed against them, for commission of offences punishable under section 6 pocso act read with section 5 (m) and (p) of the said act against the former, and for offences under section 21 pocso crl.l.p. 353/2019 & crl.l.p. ..... 418/2019 page 2 of 11 act read with section 506 indian penal code against the latter. in a nutshell, the facts of the case as elaborated by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... 7. heard the learned counsel for the official liquidator.8. from the submissions it seems that the liquidation process has been carried out duly, as per the act. as eventually there was just one claimant, hence, adherence to sections 529, 529a and 530 is not required, and accordingly disbursement as prayed for can be ..... deducting the necessary government commissions, fee, liquidation expenses from the available company fund balance.; ii. the company may kindly be dissolved under section 481 of the companies act, 1956 read with 9 of the companies (court) rules, 1959 and the official liquidator may be discharged as the liquidator of the company, and accordingly be directed ..... ms. justice jyoti singh jyoti singh, j.(oral) co. appl. no.991/2019 1. this is an application filed by the official liquidator under section 481, companies act, 1956, read with rule 281 of the company (court) rules, 1959 (hereinafter referred as ccr), seeking the following prayers: i. the official liquidator may kindly be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... , courts cannot start with a presumption that police records are untrustworthy. as a proposition of law, the presumption should be the other way around, that official acts of the police have been performed regularly, which is a wise principle of presumption and recognized even by the legislature. hence, when a police officer gives evidence ..... and robbery have been proved to have been integral parts of the same transaction and therefore the presumption arising under illustration (a) of section 114 evidence act is that not only the appellant committed the murder of the deceased but also committed robbery of her ornaments. we therefore do not find any reason to ..... 2016 respectively, the trial court convicted the accused badal and ashok as follows: - the accused badal was convicted and sentenced under the provision of section 25 arms act to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years with fine of rs 25, 000/- and in default of payment of fine, sentenced to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... order passed.2. respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1) (e) of delhi rent control act, 1958 from shop no.3 of property bearing 1372, shastri nagar, delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition.3. learned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... order passed.2. respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1) (e) of delhi rent control act, 1958 from shop no.1 of property bearing 1372, shastri nagar, delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition. rc.rev .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... order passed.2. respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1) (e) of delhi rent control act, 1958 from shop no.2 of property bearing 1372, shastri nagar, delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition. rc.rev .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... /wife instead of taking care of her mother-in-law, chose to file a false complaint against her and other family members under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, and within four days of the mother-in-law returning to her home, she had given a call to the police on 08.08.2007, again alleging mat.app ..... was also argued that the respondent/husband had admitted to have voluntarily left the matrimonial home. but such voluntariness, if at all there was, cannot be interpreted to be an act of desertion on his part as admittedly when his mother was admitted in the hospital for treatment from 02.08.2007 to 04.08.2008, the appellant/wife had filed ..... to constitute cruelty on the part of the respondent within the meaning of section 13(1)(i-a) of the mat.app.(f.c.) 240/2019 page 3 of 9 act. it is clear from the above observations that those allegations which 7. appeared to be of general nature, did not prevail upon the family court, but there were specific allegations .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... embezzlement done by her with her husband s family.5. the respondent preferred a complaint under section 12 of the prevention of women from domestic violence act against her husband and his family members including the petitioner alleging by husband and his family members including the petitioner on false and concocted facts. in ..... remains that the aforesaid allegations recorded by the revisional court are governed under section 498a/406 ipc.17. however, under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, aggrieved person and domestic relationship are defined as:-" section 2(a) aggrieved person means any woman who is, or has been, in a domestic ..... of coparcenary or because of inheritance, such right can be claimed by an independent civil suit and an application under protection of women from domestic violence act cannot be filed by a person who has established his separate household and ceased to have a domestic relationship. domestic relationship continues so long as the .....
Tag this Judgment!