Court : Delhi
..... one lakh) along with a scooter from her father, this constituting a case of cruelty to the married woman and dowry death, presumption under section 113-b of indian evidence act, 1872 being invoked for such purposes.3. the additional sessions judge accepted the prosecution case in the context of charges under section 498a/304 b and convicted the appellant by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... , which is not been shown to be perverse or unreasonable in any manner, cannot be interfered with by this court in exercise of its power under section 34 of the act.5. the next contention raised by the counsel for the petitioners is that the agreement between the parties was confined to the supply of nursing orderlies only to the dispensaries ..... shukla, mr.shobhit kumar, advs. coram: hon'ble mr. justice navin chawla navin chawla, j.(oral) 1. this petition under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the act ) has been filed by the petitioners challenging the arbitral award dated 24.08.2017 passed by the sole arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... by the lawyer for hcc on the ground that the arbitrator s order dated 27.04.2018 had been challenged by preferring a petition under section 34 on the 1996 act. 4.3 the record shows that, on 07.09.2018, an application was filed on behalf of hcc to recall the order dated 27.04.2018. the learned arbitrator issued ..... soni, advocates. coram: hon'ble mr. justice rajiv shakdher rajiv shakdher, j.(oral): this is a petition preferred under section 34 of the arbitration and 1. conciliation act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 1996 act ) to assail the award dated 08.01.2019.2. brief facts, which, one would be required to notice to adjudicate upon the instant petition, are as follows .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... administration if the passenger dies or suffers injury due to- (a) suicide or attempted suicide by him;(b) self- inflicted injury; (c) his own criminal act; (d) any act committed by him in a state of intoxication or insanity; (e) any natural cause or disease or medical or surgical treatment unless such treatment becomes necessary due to ..... compensation on account of untoward incidents: when in the course of working a railway an untoward incident occurs, then whether or not there has been any wrongful act, neglect or default on the part of the railway administration such as would entitle a passenger who has been injured or the dependant of a passenger who has ..... unexplained delay or otherwise be a ground for rejection of the claim.15. the legislature has specifically enacted section 123(c) and section 124-a of the railways act, 1989 which imposes a strict liability upon the railways. according to the abovementioned sections, the railways are to be held liable in case of an untoward incident .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... ..... respondent through nemo. coram: hon'ble mr. justice rajiv shakdher rajiv shakdher, j.(oral):1. this is a petition filed under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (in short, 1996 act ) to assail the award dated 26 december 2018.2. in order to adjudicate upon the instant petition, the following broad facts are required to be noticed. 2.1 ..... they were not built within the timelines agreed to between the parties. this propelled vg to approach this court by way of a petition under section 11 of the 1996 act. the petition was registered as arbitration petition no.531/2015. this court by an order dated 22 february 2017 appointed mr. justice r.c. lahoti, a former judge of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... a regular appeal against the judgment dated 28.09.2016. the trial court has held that the application for recall was also filed beyond the time prescribed by the limitation act, 1963. in addition to these observations, the trial court has also considered the revisionist s contentions (although the said contention is not borne out of the order dated 14.09 ..... by the impuged judgment. the revisionist filed an application on 10.03.2014, for refund of excess court fees of 39,950/- in accordance with the court fee (delhi amendment) act, 2012, which was struck down by the judgment of this court dated 09.10.2013 in w.p.(c) 4770/2012 (delhi high court bar association and anr. vs. govt .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... & anr, (2001) 1 scc652has held as under:-" 19. in this context we may point out that there is no requirement either under section 27 of the evidence act or under section 161 of the code of criminal procedure, to obtain signature of independent witnesses on the record in which statement of an accused is written. the legal obligation ..... in skin and hair of deceased, preserved after 26 days of the incident, reflected his absolute intention to finish his target. he very well knew that his such act was sure and certain to cause slow painful death of shivani that he intended to achieve. prosecution having been able to squarely prove the charges, the accused is ..... did not approach the magistrate. reliance in this behalf has been placed by sh. pipaniya on kansraj v. state of punjab, air2000 sc2324, that section 32 of evidence act does not require that the statement sought to be admitted in evidence should have been made in imminent expectation of death. further he has cited ramwati devi v. state .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... & anr, (2001) 1 scc652has held as under:-" 19. in this context we may point out that there is no requirement either under section 27 of the evidence act or under section 161 of the code of criminal procedure, to obtain signature of independent witnesses on the record in which statement of an accused is written. the legal obligation ..... in skin and hair of deceased, preserved after 26 days of the incident, reflected his absolute intention to finish his target. he very well knew that his such act was sure and certain to cause slow painful death of shivani that he intended to achieve. prosecution having been able to squarely prove the charges, the accused is ..... did not approach the magistrate. reliance in this behalf has been placed by sh. pipaniya on kansraj v. state of punjab, air2000 sc2324, that section 32 of evidence act does not require that the statement sought to be admitted in evidence should have been made in imminent expectation of death. further he has cited ramwati devi v. state .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... & anr, (2001) 1 scc652has held as under:-" 19. in this context we may point out that there is no requirement either under section 27 of the evidence act or under section 161 of the code of criminal procedure, to obtain signature of independent witnesses on the record in which statement of an accused is written. the legal obligation ..... in skin and hair of deceased, preserved after 26 days of the incident, reflected his absolute intention to finish his target. he very well knew that his such act was sure and certain to cause slow painful death of shivani that he intended to achieve. prosecution having been able to squarely prove the charges, the accused is ..... did not approach the magistrate. reliance in this behalf has been placed by sh. pipaniya on kansraj v. state of punjab, air2000 sc2324, that section 32 of evidence act does not require that the statement sought to be admitted in evidence should have been made in imminent expectation of death. further he has cited ramwati devi v. state .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... this hon ble court. vide the impugned order, the learned arc has taken into account the essential ingredients for adjudication of petition under section 14(1)(e) of the drc act, 1958 (as amended) to the effect: i) petition is the owner/landlord in respect of the tenanted premises; ii) he requires the premises bonafidely for herself or for ..... duly registered sale deed registered on 03.09.2003 and that smt. shehnaz fatima had filed a petition under the special provision of section 40 (d) of the drc act, 1958 (as amended), which however became infructuous after her demise.5. the petitioner has further submitted that he has no other property in delhi except the property in suit ..... leave to defend to eviction petition.2. the eviction petition filed by the petitioner herein under section 14 (1)(e) r/w section 25-b of the delhi rent control act, 1958 (as amended) sought the eviction of the respondent nos.1 & 2 from the tenanted premises forming the part of shop no.7289, old rohtak road, near railway .....
Tag this Judgment!