Court : DRAT Kolkata
Reported in : I(2007)BC53
..... for the delay in filing the appeal which, therefore, should be condoned.18. accordingly, the delay is condoned, the application under section 5 of the limitation act is allowed and the appeal admitted.19. the respondents are directed to file affidavits-in-opposition to the memo of appeal within three weeks, reply thereto by appellant ..... portion of the said judgment of the supreme court runs as follows: the legislature has conferred the power to condone delay by enacting section 5 of the limitation act, 1963, in order to enable the court to do substantial justice to parties by disposing of matters on 'merits'. the expression "sufficient cause" employed by the ..... deliberate laches and that the delay should not be condoned and the appeal should be dismissed.7. in support of the application under section 5 of the limitation act, the learned advocate for the applicant has staled the celebrated judgment of the hon'ble supreme court, in collector of land acquisition, anantnag v. mst. katiji .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : DRAT Kolkata
Reported in : I(2008)BC27
..... attachment of the amount lying in the hands of garnishee without hearing the defendants and without complying with the provision of sub-section (13) of section 19 of the rddbfi act, 1993 and the said order of attachment is void. (iii) on 2nd september, 2002, the bank filed evidence of affidavit and also the original document in offence but the tribunal .....
Tag this Judgment!