Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... judgment of the maharashtra revenue tribunal, aurangabad while deciding the proceeding arising out of application filed by kishanrao under section 8 of the said act. the maharashtra revenue tribunal, aurangabad has briefly narrated the developments and proceedings took place from 1959 and contentions raised by the party on ..... appreciating oral and documentary evidence, which was available on record, while exercising revisional jurisdiction. learned counsel submitted that, the maharashtra revenue tribunal has acted within revisional jurisdiction. he pressed into service the reported judgment of the supreme court in the case of rahematullarahiman sarguru vs. bapu hari mane ..... findings to that effect are totally based on surmises, conjectures and assumptions, which are against the practice and procedure and the principles of evidence act, resulting in miscarriage of justice. therefore, the maharashtra revenue tribunal cannot sit as mute spectator and it has rightly turned down the judgment of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... articles 129 and 215. therefore the constitutionally vested right cannot be either abridged, abrogated or cut down, by any legislation including the contempt of courts act. therefore, the submission of the contemnor that the impugned order is vitiated on the ground of procedural irregularities and that article 215 is to be ..... 's law dictionary, (8th edition)- "wilful" means "[v]oluntary and intentional, but not necessarily malicious" and "wilfulness" means "1. the fact or quality of acting purposely or by design; deliberateness;intention; willfulness does not necessarily imply malice, but it involves more than just knowledge. 2. the voluntary, intentional violation or disregard of ..... . 30. in the present contempt proceedings, this court is mainly concerned with maintaining the majesty of law and public confidence in judiciary. if the act of the respondent/ alleged contemnor to file undertaking and then to breach it and further to file affidavits before this court, thereby giving assurance to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
ORAL :1 This appeal is directed against the judgment and order, dated 29.6.2007, rendered by the learned Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 18 of 2007, thereby punishing the appellant under Section 344 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for giving false evidence in Sessions Trial No. 8 of 2006, and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months and to pay fine of Rs.500/, in default, rigorous imprisonment for seven days.2 The factual matrix, which gave rise for the present appeal, can be summarised as under :Pursuant to the complaint lodged by the first informant, namely Shrirang Munjaji Raut on 14.11.2005, due to death of Meerabai i.e. daughter of the complainant, criminal law was set into motion and the first information report Exh. 20 was lodged bearing C.R. No. 178 of 2005 in respect of offence punishable under Section 306 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and the accused persons thereunder were tried in Sessions Trial No. 8 o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... of the state of delaware in the united states of america. the government company means a company as defined in section 617 of the companies act. under the act of 1974 right, title and interest of esso company were acquired in order to ensure that the ownership and control of the petroleum products ..... government, respondent no.3 - hpcl had no authority to request the state government for acquisition of the subject plot under the provisions of the land acquisition act. there was no public interest and public purpose involved in acquisition of the subject plot. the land acquisition proceedings were initiated, according to the counsel, ..... deletion of the land from acquisition which was rejected on 12th march 2006. the award was passed within period of limitation prescribed under the land acquisition act. the deponent has annexed with affidavit-in-reply relevant and important documents in respect of communication exchanged between the corporation and the government authorities. agreement executed .....
Tag this Judgment!