Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 79 warrants issued under sections 77 and 7 Court: madhya pradesh Page 15 of about 196 results (0.212 seconds)

Mahavir Construction Company Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(1)MPLJ69

..... has been voluntarily accepted by the government and the government is taking benefit of it, therefore, the government is liable under section 70 of the contract act to compensate the petitioner. shri aradhe, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that section 70 is not applicable to the instant case as the soil was ..... , is not liable to pay extra lead. apart from the contract, the government is also bound to compensate the petitioner under 70 of the contract act as they are enjoying the benefits of the work done by the petitioner. he submitted that the tribunal committed illegality and material irregularity in rejecting petitioner's ..... gave assurances to the petitioner that soil would be available in free lead area. the inter se correspondence between the departmental officers also confirmed this assumption. acting on such assurances and representations, the petitioner executed the contract agreement. when the petitioner started work no soil was made available in the free lead area. .....

Smt. Yuvrani Tank Rajeshwari Devi Vs. Harilal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1978MP201; 1978MPLJ433

..... collectors and (ii) that there was non-compliance of the provisions of sections 19h and 19i of the court-fees act. on behalf of the parties, a number of rulings were cited and some of which are: moonga devi v radha bal-labh. air 1972 sc 1471; smt, kamla devi v. kishori lal labhu ram, air 1962 punj 196; banwarilal ..... nagpur were already published. in view of these facts, the probate proceedings could not be held to be invalid for want of proper citations.28. in eusoof ahmed seema v. ismail ahmed seema, air 1938 rang 261 (fb) it is held that person claiming issue of citation and its service must show prima facie case for revocation. the absence of ..... be justified in refusing to exercise our discretion in favour of the petitioner.32. regarding non-compliance with the provisions of sections 19h and 19i of the court-fees act, such pleas were not raised by the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 in the previous proceedings for which there is no reasonable explanation. the question of court-fee .....

Chief Municipal Officer Vs. Mahila Munni Devi and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... together (fraus et jus nunquam cohabitant); or fraud and deceit ought to benefit none (fraus et dolus nemini patrocinari debent). 26. fraud may be defined as an act of deliberate deception with the design of securing some unfair or undeserved benefit by taking undue advantage of another. in lfaud one gains at the loss of another. ..... is obtained by fraud, it cannot be said to be a judgment or order in law. before three centuries, chief justice edward coke proclaimed: "fraud avoids all judicial acts, ecclesiastical or temporal." 22. it is thus settled proposition of law that a judgment, decree or order obtained by playing fraud on the court, tribunal or authority ..... and conditions that right of ownership was granted in favour of the respondent. in accordance with the provision of section 312 chapter xi of the m.p. municipalities act, 1961 the compromise can only be entered with the permission by the municipal council. no such permission was taken by the president and cmo of nagar panchayat .....

Registered District Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Ba ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... cooperative society fails to fulfill its obligations". the obligation flowing from section 48- aa is to take action against such person who suffered any disqualification under the act and rules within the stipulated time. section 48-aa (i), in no uncertain terms makes it clear that "if the society fails to take action within two ..... by annexure p/1. it is submitted that the registered notices were legally served on the petitioners. reliance is placed on section 27 of the general clauses act. it is contended that full reasonable and effective opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners. petitioners s/shri mukut singh and suresh kumar did not pay ..... repealed. reliance is placed on air 1987 sc 1015 (yogendra pal singh vs. union of india). lastly, it is submitted that section 28 of general clauses act has no application in the present case because admittedly, the respondents have not issued notices by registered post with acknowledgment due. the petitioners have not advanced any argument .....

Ramniwas and Others Vs. Game Range Chambal Sanctuary Bhind Headquarter ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2012CrLJ1747

..... judgment has no application in the facts and circumstances of this case. in the said case, the full bench was dealing with a different question regarding provisions of 1972 act. 20. learned public prosecutor has relied on 2000 (3) mplj 27 (union of india vs. raju construction company). para16 of the said judgment reads as under:- ..... an order, on application seeking supurdagi under section 457 of the criminal procedure code in cases he is informed by forest officer under section 52(4) of the forest act. therefore, the learned j.m.f.c. is found to have committed no illegality or impropriety in rejecting the petitioner's application moved under section 457 of ..... said application on the ground that the information of seizure of said tractor trolley is already received by the magistrate and, therefore, under the provisions of the forest act, the jurisdiction of magistrate is ousted. at this stage, the petitioner filed a revision under section 397 cr.p.c. before the additional sessions judge, morena .....

Digvijay Singh and Others Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... for transfer of investigation to another independent investigating agency, namely, cbi, can be considered only if the petitioners are in a position to substantiate inertia or acts of commission and omission of the stf during the investigation of the stated cases subsequent to the earlier decision. 3. realizing this position, counsel appearing for ..... s) had attributed any motives to any official(s) of stf. on the contrary, there was enough material to indicate that the officials of stf were acting fairly and independently and were not taking instructions from their higher-ups in the state administration. for, during investigation of the assigned crimes, they proceeded to ..... , however, does not take the matter any further for deciding the argument under consideration. in that, issuance of a notification under section 6 of the act is not envisaged for entrusting the investigation to cbi on the basis of consent given by the state government. accordingly, the point under consideration deserves to .....

Vishnu Dheemar Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... . he could be arrested only on 4.4.2002 i.e. after about six years of the occurrence. though investigating officer recorded a memorandum under section 27 of the evidence act about the recovery of knife given by appellant, but the knife was not recovered. therefore, the absence of evidence about the weapon of offence does not affect the prosecution case .....

Tejas Construction and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Municipal Council, ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... 's firm on merits, without objecting to it's eligibility. 2. facts relevant for the petition are that the petitioner is a private limited company duly registered under the companies act, 1956. it is engaged in civil work projects like spinning mills, sugar factories, water supply project, power project, etc. municipal council, sendhwa (respondent no.1) published a notice inviting tender ..... is not the case of the petitioner that the particulars and the figures mentioned in the certificate are incorrect. petitioner, by virtue of sections 159 and 163 of the companies act, could have obtained certified copy of balance sheets of respondent no.2 to demonstrate incorrectness, if any. the petitioner, having not chosen to place any such documents on record, cannot .....

Padmesh Goutam Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... of the appellant in respect of such offence of the adhiniyam is hereby quashed. however, the vehicle will be treated to be seized only under the motor vehicles act for which the appellant will have to make application for grant of custody before the appropriate court of competent jurisdiction.6. the writ appeal is allowed to the extent ..... rewa. on 09.09.2012, the officer-in- charge, traffic, district shahdol, seized the vehicle of the appellant and registered certain offences under the provisions of motor vehicles act, 1988 as also under section 16(3) of the adhiniyam. the state government has issued the notification authorizing officers to seize a vehicle under the adhiniyam, if any violation of ..... c), 146/196, 115(7)/190(2), 130(1)(2)(3)/177, 9/177, 36/177 of the motor vehicles act and rule 77/177 of the motor vehicles rules. for the offences under the motor vehicles act, the respondent no.3 was competent to seize the vehicle as notification in that respect was not required but for the .....

Anil Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... /respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- order (passed on the 9th day of january, 2013) the applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under sections 146, 147 of indian railways act, 1989 by the learned special railway magistrate, khandwa in criminal case no.508/2006 vide judgment dated 9.8.2012 and fine of rs.600/- was imposed for ..... is a good case, in which the applicant may be released on probation by giving the benefit of provision under section 3 of the probation of offenders act.7. consequently, the revision filed by the applicant is hereby partly allowed. the conviction directed against the applicant for the offence punishable under sections 146 and ..... but, the sentence of fine is hereby set aside. the applicant is released on probation under the provisions of section 3 of the probation of offenders act, after due admonition. the applicant would be entitled for get the fine amount back from the trial court.8. a copy of the order be .....