Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 79 warrants issued under sections 77 and 7 Court: himachal pradesh Page 6 of about 55 results (0.826 seconds)

Leela Sood and ors. Vs. Manohar Lal

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)ShimLC498

..... petition are that the respondent-landlord, hereinafter referred to as the landlord for convenience sake, has filed a petition under section 14 of the h.p. urban rent control act, 1987 against the petitioners-tenants, hereinafter referred to as the tenants for convenience sake, in the court of learned rent controller, court no. 3, shimla.3. ..... the petitioner has no locus standi to file the present petition, as alleged? opr6. whether the petitioner is estopped from filing the present petition on account of his own acts, deed, conduct, etc. as alleged? opr7. relief.the learned rent controller has recorded the following findings on the issues framed:issue no. 1: yes.issue no. ..... rent is payable for any premises and includes-(a) such sub-tenants and other persons as have derived title under a tenant before the coming into operation of this act; (b) any person remaining, after the determination of the lease, in possession, with or without the assent of the landlord, of the premises leased to such .....

State of H.P. Vs. Surinder Pal Singh and Another

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... , would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do. again as explained in nidamarti negaghu-shanams case, a culpable rashness is acting with the consciousness that the mischievous and illegal consequences may follow, but with the hope that they will not, and often with the belief that the actor ..... the criminality lies in running the risk of doing such an act with recklessness or indifference as to the consequences. criminal negligence is the gross and culpable neglect or failure to exercise that reasonable and proper care and precaution ..... straight, j. made the following pertinent observations which have been quoted with approval by various courts including this court; criminal rashness is hazarding a dangerous or wanton act with the knowledge that it is so, and that it may cause injury, but without intention to cause injury, or knowledge that it will probably be caused. .....

Arun Kumar Vs. Prakash Chand Gupta

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... lifting the veil that the partnership was purportedly made by arun kumar and manohar lal, and arun kumar and vijay kumar to defeat and overreach the provisions of the act. thus, in these circumstances, it can safely be presumed that parting of possession by arun kumar and manohar lal was for consideration. 26. mr. bhupender gupta, ..... under a mutual agreement or understanding between the tenant and the person to whom the possession is so delivered. in this process, the landlord, concealing the overt acts and transferring possession clandestinely to a person who is an utter stranger to the landlord, in the sense that the landlord had not let out the premises to ..... supersede the general law of tenancy if the provisions of the special statute are incompatible with the general law of tenancy. under section 14 of the rent act, mere knowledge of the landlord about occupation of the tenanted premises by the said registered society and acceptance of rent for the tenanted premises tendered by the .....

Gopi Nath and Sons Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1981CriLJ175

..... magistrate,solan, district solan (h. p.).obviously the charge should have been under section 16(1)(a)(i) read with section 7 of the prevention of food adulteration act and not under section 16(1)(i) as framed by the learned chief judicial magistrate.8. the contention of the petitioner is that the charge framed against him is ..... against the accused is groundless. prima facie wrapper falls within the definition of package. charge be framed'.11. the term 'package' has been defined in section 2(x) of the act as under:'package' means a box, bottle, casket, tin, barrel, case, receptacle, sack, bag, wrapper or other thing in which an article of food is placed or packed ..... . part vii of the rules framed under the act and which starts from rule 32 deals with 'packing and labelling of foods'. rule 32 is in the following terms:32. contents of the label. - unless otherwise provided in .....

State of H.P Vs. Des Raj

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... held that even if the substance was not opium since there was 2.8% anhydride morphine it was a manufactured drug within the meaning of section 2(xi) of the act, which reads as follows:- 2(xi) manufactured drug means- (a) all coca derivatives, medicinal cannabis opium derivatives and poppy straw concentrate; (b) any other narcotic ..... more than 0.2% morphine or containing any amount of diacetylmorphine/heroin are also opium derivatives within the meaning of clause (e) of section 2(xvi) of the act. 20. in amarsingh ramjibhai barots case (supra) when the apex court found that anhydride morphine was 2.8% the substance was considered to be opium derivative falling ..... papaver, notified by the central government in the official gazette, within the meaning of sub-clause (b) of section 2(xvii) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act. hence, the submission made by the learned additional advocate general that the report, ex. pw-17/e, is different in its contents from the report that was .....