Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 73 capture of deserters Page 8 of about 1,409 results (0.234 seconds)

Mar 28 1972 (HC)

Sujataali, Motebarali and anr. Vs. Rupchand Vishnu Dhande and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1973Bom365; (1973)75BOMLR257; ILR1973Bom1163; 1973MhLJ766

..... tribunal and the additional mamlatdar, yawal, held that because the landlady had applied under s. 31 read with s. 29 of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1948, for recovering possession of the land for bona fide personal cultivation and obtained possession after fighting the litigation up to the revenue tribunal of the half portion on ..... paid the rent. after remand possession was again ordered by the tenancy awal karkun. the deputy collector set aside that order. the revenue tribunal confirmed that order, bal j. refused to interfere with the order of the tribunal and while doing so made an observation that even though s. 31c prevented the widow from making an ..... 29 read with section 14 was not maintainable. the tribunal upheld this contention. the said decision of the tribunal was challenged in the above special civil application and bal j. held that section 32-f was attracted as the petitioner was a widow and hence the tenant could not become the purchaser and section 31-c was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 2006 (HC)

Goetze (India) Ltd. Rep. by Chief General Manager, Mr. Lodhi and the E ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(4)KarLJ654

..... though may escape the consequences when such action is examined from the touchstone of article 14 and 16 of the constitution of india cannot be allowed to act arbitrarily to terminate the service of a permanent employee without valid and legally justifiable reason when examined from the touchstone of article 21 of the constitution ..... court has made a passing reference that in the private sector the managerial cadre of employees altogether is excluded from the purview of the industrial disputes act and similar labour legislation and the private sector can cut the deadwood and can get rid of the managerial cadre employee incase he is considered to ..... the decree of mandatory injunction for reinstatement etc cannot be granted since the first defendant is a public limited company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956, the defendants also denied that the order of termination is actuated by malafides. they have further attempted to justify that they have merely terminated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2001 (HC)

Sukhdarshan Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1620; 2002(5)WLC487; 2002(2)WLN333

..... .5 jaganath, the case of dowry demand come, but as stated above and looking to the facts that they were living separately from deceased-wife and no specific overt act has been alleged against them and that other relatives, namely, purshottam, jeth of the deceased-wife, rekha, wife of purshottam and renu, nanad of the deceased wife ..... or the other relations cannot, in all cases, be held to be involved in the demand of dowry. in case where such accusations are made, the overt acts attributed to persons other than husband are required to be proved beyond reasonable doubt. by mere conjectures and implications such relations cannot be held guilty for the offence relating ..... 2 gaurav, pw 7 amritpalsingh an dw 8 pawan kumar and the learned special addl. sessions judge has further erred in invoking section 113b of the indian evidence act in the present case.4. that accused appellants kishorilal, father-in-law of deceased-wife and smt. sita, mother-in-law of deceased-wife were residing separately and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2002 (HC)

ito Vs. Maheshwari Nirman Udyog

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2004)86TTJ(NULL)410

..... the parties are admittedly income-tax assessees. the amount given and accepted was duly explained amount. hence, there was no addition made under section 68 of the act.5.8 while interpreting penalty provisions the legislative intent and the object behind the enactment plays important role and has always to be kept in mind. the cbdt ..... cit, bikaner range, bikaner.5. the learned authorised representative made the following submissions :5.1 the transaction with sister-concern was not covered by section 269ss of the act. it is an admitted position of facts that there are transactions between two sister-concerns. the assessing officer and the learned dy. cit both have used the words ' ..... 94.2. in this case, the assessing officer had levied a penalty of rs. 5,05,300 under section 271d of the act for violation of provisions contained in section 269ss of the act which prohibits taking or accepting from any other person any loan or deposit otherwise than by an account payee cheque or account payee .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 01 2008 (HC)

Ramesh Kumar Sharma Vs. Smt. Akash Sharma

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2008HP78,II(2008)DMC315,2008(1)ShimLC399

..... office and the residences of his superior officers using abusive language against him, humiliated him in the presence of his colleagues and superior officers. all these acts caused mental cruelty to the appellant. the respondent had filed two divorce petitions. these were compromised in the fervent hope that the respondent would live normally, ..... is, having illicit relations with his sister-in-law (bhabi), smt. sushma devi. these wild allegations have caused great mental cruelty to the petitioner. the acts mentioned above have caused great mental harassment to the petitioner and she has deserted the petitioner for more than two years without any reasonable cause,(ii) that ..... . there is no cohabitation between the parties since 1982 as admitted by the respondent. although the concept of mental cruelty cannot be cribbed and confined to particular acts, the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in samar ghosh v. jaya ghosh : (2007)4scc511 , lays down the principles applicable. the court held:98 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2013 (HC)

Shiv Kumar and Another Vs. Rajesh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... motor car. separate definition has been provided for tractor in section 2(44) of the act. while light motor vehicle though includes the motor car as well as the tractor yet it is not a case where shiv kumar is authorized to drive a light motor ..... -5- decision here is as to whether the tractor is included in car or jeep. while defining motor car, it is laid down in section 2(26) of the act that it means any motor vehicle other than a transport vehicle, omnibus, road-roller, tractor, motorcycle or invalid carriage. the tractor is,therefore, specifically excluded from the definition of ..... who died in a road accident that occurred on 08.12.2008 and sachin, an injured had filed claim petitions under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (for short 'the act') for compensation. vide award dated 11.06.2010, learned tribunal has awarded a sum of kumar dinesh 2013.08.06 10:47 i attest to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2014 (HC)

...Respondent Vs. Devinder Kumar Singla

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... directions for remedying and rectifying the things done in violation of its orders. the petitioners therein had given an undertaking to the bombay high court. they acted in breach of it. a learned single judge held them guilty of contempt and imposed a sentence of one month s imprisonment. in addition thereto, ..... the possession to the rightful claimants whose rights have been determined in the court proceedings. it would also inflict punishment in terms of the contempt of courts act besides imposing deterrent costs. the hon'ble supreme court in delhi development authority vs. skipper construction company (p) ltd. and another, air1996sc2005has observed as follows ..... of his legitimate possession by inducting his brother-in-law in the premises. when confronted with the prospect of adverse order under the contempt of courts act, possession was immediately restored to the landlord within hours and the civil suit withdrawn. there is a common thread running through all these cases including the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 2014 (HC)

R.Manickam Vs. the Presiding Officer

Court : Chennai

..... advers.remarks on previous occasion for similar minor misconduct. if that is so, unauthorised absence during 1987, 1988 and 1989 will not amount to ".habitual doing of act". and equivalent to gross misconduct, warranting major punishment of discharge from service. on this score alone, the impugned order of discharge in respect of the firs. ..... and 1989 and failure to respond to the memos issued by the bank, calling for explanation about the unauthorised absence. it is not in dispute that the act of unauthorised absence from duty in 1987 is already the subject matter of earlier departmental proceedings, resulting in punishment of stoppage of increment for one year. if ..... 420 r/w 34 ipc, which are classified as major misconduct. out of three charges, misconduct alleged in firs.charge is treated as habitual doing of acts of minor misconduct and wilful insubordination or disobedience of lawful and reasonable order of the superiors and hence amounts to an offence and gross misconduct under para 521 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 02 2014 (HC)

Sachin Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... offences punishable under sections 498a, 306, 304-b read with section 34 indian penal code ('ipc' for short) and under sections 3, 4 and 6 of dowry prohibition act ('d.p. act for short). 2. the sentence imposed for the offence under the different provisions is as follows: (i) section 304-b of i.p.c. - life imprisonment (ii ..... in secrecy, independent and direct evidence is not easy to get. that is why the legislature has by introducing sections 113-a and 113-b in the evidence act tried to strengthen the prosecution hands by permitting a presumption to be raised if certain foundational facts are established and the unfortunate event has taken place within seven years ..... by the trial court convicting the appellant and the sentence imposed for the offences punishable under sections 498a, 306 of ipc and sections 3, 4 and 6 of dp act is confirmed. ii) the conviction recorded by the trial court insofar as the offence punishable under section 304-b of ipc is confirmed, however, the sentence stands .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2016 (HC)

Harish Kumar and Others Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... the accused persons at different stages of the proceedings, they failed to rebut the presumption which arose against them under section 113b of the indian evidence act. the entire evidence was meticulously examined by the learned additional sessions judge while convicting the appellants under section 498a/304b/34 ipc. the same does ..... suicide a brutal self-humiliation of "life". 34. having established the essential ingredients of section 304b ipc, a presumption under section 113b of the evidence act arose against the accused persons that it was not a dowry death. although this presumption is rebuttable but the onus shifted upon the accused persons to ..... dowry death on proof of certain essentials. the 91st law commission, recommended for the insertion of new sections in indian penal code, 1860, indian evidence act, 1872 and criminal procedure code, 1973 for tackling the problem of alarming increase in number of cases in which married women die in highly suspicious circumstances. crimes that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //