Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 73 capture of deserters Page 15 of about 1,409 results (0.203 seconds)

Growth Leasing and Finance Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (1998)66ITD67(Ahd.)

..... suffered heavy losses and accordingly the maharashtra government declared it as a relief undertaking under the provisions of the bombay relief undertaking (special provisions) act, 1958 and it was also referred to bifr for revival. nirlon also suffered heavy losses and was not in a position to pay back even ..... ii) lease rentals 7,49,856 ----------- the government of maharashtra declared nsfcl as a relief undertaking under the provisions of the bombay relief undertaking (special provisions) act, 1958. nsfcl has made reference to the board for industrial & financial reconstruction (bifr) for determination of measures to be adopted with respect to the company ..... lakhs towards lease rental.fourthly, the government of maharashtra had declared nirlon as a relief undertaking under the provisions of bombay relief undertakings (special provisions) act, 1956. on 31st march, 1988, a reference was also made to the board for industrial reconstruction for determination of measures to be adopted for revival .....

Most Shakuntala Mehta Vs. The Steel Authority of India Limited Through ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... in the area meant for garage (for upper floors), there was encroachment by this appellant. hence, provisions of the public premises (eviction of unauthorized occupants) act, 1971 is applicable and these facts make the present case different from the facts of the banatwala & company versus l.i.c. of india & another case ..... entertain this letters patent appeal mainly for the following facts and reasons: (i) initially notice was given under the public premises (eviction of unauthorized occupants) act, 1971 and the same was adjudicated upon vide order dated 06.10.2006 and the order of eviction was passed by the estate officer; (ii) this ..... ps & po bokaro steel city, district bokaro; 4. the estate officer, bokaro steel city, po & ps bokaro steel city, district-bokaro. ...respondents --- coram :- hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble mr. justice ratnaker bhengra --- for the appellant : mr. sunil kumar, advocate. for the respondents : m/s indrajit sinha, arpan mishra & amitabh prasad, advocates. .....

Hari Lal Vs. Balvantia and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1998(2)AWC1069

..... deeds were executed during pendency of the suit. such sale deeds are hit by doctrine of lis pendens enshrined in section 52 of the transfer of property act. the defendants-appellant who purchased the property with full knowledge of her right to receive maintenance cannot now be permitted to defeat this important right by purchasing ..... defendants in whose favour the property has been transferred during pendency of the suit. for this purpose, in our opinion, section 39 of the transfer of property act is the appropriate provision under which the plaintiff-respondent could claim maintenance against the transferees. section 39 reads as under :'39. transfer where third person is ..... plaintiff was decreed by judgment and decree dated 27.3.1997, aggrieved by which the present appeal has been filed under section 19 of the family courts act.9. we have heard counsel for the appellant and the respondents. learned counsel for the appellant assailing the impugned judgment of the family court has submitted .....

Pardeep and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)2PLR505

..... on their business therein. the state of haryana, without considering the nature of structures, existing on the land, issued a notification, under section 4 of the act, dated 29.11.2001, proposing to acquire land in villages nagal kalan and kundli for the ostensible public purpose, namely, for the development and utilization as ..... , dated 7.3.2003, detailing the constructions, raised by the petitioners. despite this report, the land acquisition collector served a notice, under section 9 of the act, requiring the petitioners to submit their respective claim qua compensation.4. it is argued that as the petitioners have raised constructions, in the shape of houses, a ..... certain caveats, primary among them being that the structures should be in existence on the date of the issuance of the notification under section 4 of the act and the released land should be capable of adjustment, within the proposed planning. a plea for release, duly considered within the parameters of the policy, would .....

National Cooperative Consumers Federation of India Limited Vs. the Ori ...

Court : Kolkata

..... 2006) 11 scc 651 rodemadan india ltd v. international trade expo centre ltd. the view was expressed in the context of the applicability of section 42 of the 1996 act to a petition under section 11 thereof.12. the petitioner also relies on the unreported delhi judgment to say that even in such case the court recognised that disputes between ..... to arbitration if the arbitrator is nominated by the respondent or by its chairman-cum-managing director. the petitioner says that a request under section 11 of the 1996 act is not carried to a court but it is a request that has to be made to a chief justice or his designate. for such purpose the petitioner ..... court of law.' the court emphasised, in chief conservator of forests v. collector, that the '(v)arious departments of the government are its limbs and, therefore, they must act in coordination and not in confrontation.'8. the petitioner attempts to assert that it is not under the control of the central government and, for such purpose, it relies on .....

X Vs. Y

Court : Mumbai

..... as withdrawn; (vii) on 31.01.2008, the respondent filed special civil suit no. 4 of 2008 under section 18 (2) of the hindu adoption and maintenance act against the appellant, his sister, father, elder sister in the court of cjsd ahmednagar. in that suit, the respondent claimed that she was entitled to recover rs.45 ..... right in recording the finding that the husband had successfully established the case of desertion by the wife and exercising the discretion vested under section 13-a of the act, the learned trial judge had granted the decree of judicial separation instead of divorce? 16. the judgments of the supreme court referred to above clearly establish that ..... later affirmed by the supreme court in the case of lachmanutamchand kripalni vs. meena (air 1964 sc 40), whilst dealing with a case of desertion under the hindu marriage act, 1955, in the following words. once desertion, as defined earlier, is established there is no obligation on the deserted husband ( taking the case where he is .....

Sameer Ahmed Khan Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... by this court in the past. it needs to be presumed that these interim orders and directions were subject to result of the proceeding and the provisions of the act. the petitioner did not come to this court for getting permission for making application to appear for the common entrance test which is held for admission to post ..... ). the facts were different. 15. the procedure prescribed by the apex court in the case of madhuri patil (cited supra) and the procedure laid down in the act and the rules show that strict verification of the caste before giving benefit to a person is necessary so that the benefit is given to the real backward class person ..... to scheduled tribe, raj. in view of this circumstance, the other record which is mentioned above cannot be given much importance. 14. provision of section 6 of the act shows that each and every claim is expected to be verified by the committee independently. this becomes more necessary when there is no validity certificate in favour of the .....

M/s. Goman Agro-Farms Private Ltd. and Others Vs. M/s. Nagavali Greenl ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... company limited) is holding 1 share (0.004% shareholding). that upon this scheme being effective, the transferee company shall without any further application, act, instrument or deed, issue and allot to the shareholders of the transferor company (except to the transferee company and its nominee shareholder) a total of 4 ..... , non-commercial crops etc. 4. in company petition no.193 of 2015, the petitioner transferee company averred that it was originally incorporated under the act on 20.05.2005 as maytas rajeshwari development private limited; that its name was further changed as maytas hill country private limited on 28.12.2005, as ..... other lands, properties and to plant grow, cultivate, produce, raise, process, store, grind, clean, mix, grade, polish, can, import, export, buy, sell warehouse, and to act as an agent, broker, stockiest, indenter, consignor, merchant, farmer, or otherwise to deal in all types of seeds, grains, vegetables, foods, cereals, herbals, flowers, fruits, edibles .....

Lakhan and Another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... his pocket which he suddenly brought out and stabbed the deceased. 9. section 34 has been enacted on the principle of joint liability in the commission of a criminal act. the section is only a rule of evidence and does not create a substantive offence. the distinctive feature of the section is the element of participation in action. the ..... of section 34 the essence of the liability is to be found in the existence of a common intention animating the accused leading to the commission of a criminal act in furtherance of such intention. as a result of the application of principles enunciated in section 34, when an accused is convicted under section 302 read with section 34 ..... some knowledge that the accused lakhan would inflict some injury on the deceased could not be ruled out. such common intention can be formed even during the commission of the act. as such, so far as the accused virendra is concerned, looking to the injury caused, he can be held guilty under section 304 part ii ipc. 20. .....

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... and appellant earned dividend income at rs. 1,82,12,862/- which was not taxable in view of section 10(33) of the income-tax act.particulars purchase sale gain/loss dividend date amount date amount date amountunits of 24.3.00 80000000-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 29.3.00less 2376778 27.3.00 59055207. ..... investment. g) dividend is distributed from accumulated profits of a company with reference to its subscribed share capital in accordance with the provisions of companies act; whereas mfs distribute income from its 'equalization reserve' comprising profits and premium charged on sale of units as per sebi regulations." 35. the ..... assessee filed appeal before the learned cit(appeals). the assessee submitted that units of mutual funds were regulated by an independent body constituted under the act of parliament, viz., sebi. the assessee had followed the prescribed procedure and the transactions with the mutual funds were at arms length. the .....