Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 73 capture of deserters Court: karnataka Page 70 of about 783 results (0.075 seconds)

Mahadev S/o Vishwanth Swamy Vs. Smt. Vishalakshi W/o Mahadev Swamy

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... court and the first appellate court have concurrently held that she is in possession of the suit property. hence, the proviso to section 34 of the specific relief act is not attracted and the said substantial question of law is answered in the affirmative, against the defendant. 3328. the second substantial question of law is answered in ..... such transaction was not induced by undue influence, shall lie upon the person in a position to dominate the will of another. section 111 of the indian evidence act also states: where there is a question as to the good faith of a transaction between parties, one of whom stands to the other in a position of ..... law in entertaining suit for mere declaration and injunction without claiming the relief of consequential relief of possession, which is contrary of proviso to section 34 of specific relief act?.2. whether both the courts below were justified in law in decreeing the suit, when the plaintiff could not prove the fraud alleged to have been played by .....

Sharnavva @ Kasturi Vs. Shivappa

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... rp no.200044/2018 instigated by his mother and sister. as such, the petitioner constrained to file petition under section 12 of the protection of woman from domestic violence act, (for short the act ).3. the trial court allowed the petition partly and ordered the respondent to pay rs.3,000/- per month as maintenance. being aggrieved by the same, the ..... court and it is nullified by the competent court having jurisdiction to pass such order. the courts while dealing with the maintenance matters, either under section 12 of the act or under section 125 of cr.p.c. should not go into the validity of the marriage. however, the court may peruse the evidence of the wife as to ..... dehors its jurisdiction. in the present case, the appellate court gone into the validity of the marriage and set aside the order of maintenance passed under section 12 of the act, which is beyond its jurisdiction and hence, it is liable to be set aside.11. hence, i proceed to pass the following: - 8 - crl.rp no.200044/2018 .....

Chowdaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... arguments submitted that there is no whisper about the active involvement of the present petitioner (accused no.5) in the alleged commission of the crime. every overt act alleged against the accused may be as against the remaining accused only but not against the present petitioner. he further submits that to prove the commission of an ..... with s.34 of indian penal code (for short, ipc ) and section 3(2)(va) of the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) amendment act, 2015. his crl.r.p.no.494/2020 3 application filed before the trial court under section 227 of criminal procedure code (for short, cr.p.c.) seeking his discharge ..... offences punishable under sections363 201, 302, 114, 120b read with section34of i.p.c. and under section32)(va) of the sc & st (prevention of atrocities) amendment act, 2015 and consequently discharge him from the case in the ends of justice. this criminal revision petition coming on for admission along with i.a.2/2021 through physical .....

Sri M Surendra Rao Vs. Sri M Raveendra Rao

Court : Karnataka

..... title and interest over the suit schedule property, in return for a valuable consideration in favour of the second party to the agreement.10. section 17 of the registration act, 1908, speaks about the documents that are compulsorily registerable. section 17(1)(b) mentions that, other non-testamentary instruments which purport or operate to create, declare, ..... not purport to by itself create, declare, assign, extinguish or limit right in properties. thus, the khararunama may not attract section 49(1)(a) of the registration act. it is keeping the above principle laid down in the above judgments in mind, the present case is required to be analysed.9. undisputedly, the suit of the ..... 49 years, r/at near svv temple, railway station road, kasargod, kerala 671121.5. m/s. mukka sea food industries pvt.ltd., a company registeed under the companies act having office at 1st floor, trinity complex, m.g. road, attavara, mangaluru, d.k. dist.575001. represented by its chairman, k. abdul razak, s/o. late .....

Sri Lakshmikanta K Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... members and nominated members who play essentially an advisory role. pursuant to the seventy-fourth 29 constitutional amendment of 1994, sections 9, 65 and 72 of the act were amended. prior to the amendment the co- opted members were at par with the elected members, however, after 1994 only elected members and members of ..... thus, article 243r (2)(a) mandates that nominated members shall not have right to vote in the meetings of the municipality.13. the relevant sections of the karnataka municipalities act, 1964: section 2. definitions: xxx (6 ) 'councillor' means a person who is legally a member of municipal council [or town panchayat]. section 11. constitution of municipal ..... as nominated councilors are entitled to cast their vote in the election for the post of president / vice president under section42(2) of the karnataka municipalities act, 1964. declare that the votes cast by the petitioners in the election held on3012.2021 for the post of president in the respondent no.3 council as .....

Sri Syed Ahammed Vs. State Of Karnataka By Food Inspector

Court : Karnataka

..... the accused (petitioner herein) guilty for the alleged offences punishable under sections 7(i), 7(ii) read with section 16(a)(i) of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954, warrants any interference at the hands of this court?.10. the learned counsel for the revision petitioner in his argument, canvassed mainly two points. the first point ..... high court government pleader for the respondent - state in his argument submitted that, it is not necessary that, under clause (l) of section 2 (ia) of the act, a commodity should be necessarily injurious to health. he further submitted that the non-mentioning of the batch number and non-printing of 'best before' on the cover being ..... ' and 'veg' or 'non-veg' symbol, which is clearly an offence under section 7(i) and 7(ii) punishable under section 16(1)(a) of the act.23. it is analysing these facts and appreciating the materials placed before them in their proper perspective, since both the trial court and the sessions judge's court have properly .....

Suchitra Cinema And Cultural Academy Vs. The Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... 26.02.2015 resisting the writ petition. learned panel counsel contends that the bda being the statutory authority has to function under the provisions of 1976 act and therefore it cannot undertake any charitable activity like making donation that are not authorized by the statutory scheme. in support of this, he relies on ..... concession, whatever be the nomenclature adopted in the impugned letter. she vociferously presses into service both the doctrine of estoppel under section 115 of the indian evidence act, 1872 and the doctrine of promissory estoppel vide apex court decision in union of india vs indo afghan agencies, air1968sc718 in support of her case. 55. ..... 2023 before the hon'ble mr. justice krishna s.dixit writ petition no.58854 of2014bda) between: suchitra cinema and cultural academy., a trust registered under the indian trusts act, 1882 having its principal office at c.a. no.36, banashankari ii stage, bangalore-560 070, represented by its chariman, mr. k.v. ravindaranath tagore, ... .....

Mr Murugan T Vs. P Jayagovinda Bhat

Court : Karnataka

..... . poornabodha rao, advocate for r-2; r-1 - served and un-represented) - 2 - mfa no.554 of 2020 **** this miscellaneous first appeal is filed under section1731) of the motor vehicles act, 1988, praying to modify/set aside the judgment and award dated0507-2019 in m.v.c.no.1224/2017, passed by the i additional district judge and mact-ii, mangaluru ..... accident claims tribunal-ii, mangaluru (d.k.), (hereinafter for brevity referred to as "the tribunal") whose claim petition under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as the m.v. act ) for compensation from the respondents herein came to be dismissed as devoid of merit by the tribunal vide its impugned judgment and award dated 05 .....

The State Of Karnataka Vs. Ramaiah Reddy

Court : Karnataka

..... karnataka appellate tribunal and the land being restored to its owner. the doctrine of frustration of contract is enacted inter alia in sec.56 of the indian contract act, 1872, which employs the word impossible . the super meaning impossibility in the performance of contract has to be construed in its practical and not literal sense vide ..... this court, the state government has thought it fit to convey alternative land and therefore, this is one other instance, which would indicate that the state government is acting arbitrarily insofar as the sale transactions are concerned. hence, the petitioner would have to be given his due.-. 3 - nc:2024. khc:17767-db wa no.1640 ..... , bengalore-560 052. respondent (by sri.k.n.phaneendra, sr. counsel sri. yadupathi g., advocate) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition20612016 dated1702/2016 cf sufficient appeal out of time. this appeal coming on for orders, this day, krishna s .....

The High Court of Karnataka Vs. Prof. P.N. Shetty

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1747; ILR1996KAR685; 1996(2)KarLJ137

..... . he raised an objection that this court is performing the role of both prosecutor and deciding the case. this court over ruled the objection as the contempt of courts act provides for the court to decide the questions relating to contempt, even if the contempt is in relation to this court. it was held that the documents produced by ..... court and that the said statements interfere or tend to interfere with due course of the judicial proceedings, which is punishable under section 12 of the contempt of court's act, 1971. the statements of the accused which amounted to contempt were set out in the charge. the accused pleaded not guilty to the above charges. 7. sri a. b ..... actions and committing an apparent fraud. he further contends that it is dangerous for any member of the judiciary to take shelter under contempt of courts act and that the contempt of court's act is a law enacted to pamper the false ego of such naive members of the judiciary and/or to suppress people's right to question any .....