Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 7 liability for service outside india Sorted by: recent Page 4 of about 6,545 results (0.345 seconds)

Apr 02 2024 (HC)

Vijay Industries Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... purchasers. under these circumstances, it is clear that the expression any private markets contemplated under the 4th proviso to section 65(2) of the said act of 1966 includes both private market yards and direct purchasers / direct purchase centers and failure to appreciate this by the learned single judge has resulted ..... agricultural marketing. the director of agricultural marketing after inspection and enquiry as are considered necessary and shall by a notification issued under section 6 of the act declare the private market yard for the regulation of marketing of notified agricultural produce specified in the notification. (8) after the issue of notification under ..... agricultural produce directly from an agriculturist; or (c) establish a farmer consumer market; unless he possess a valid licence issued under the provisions of this act or rules made thereunder. (2) subject to such conditions and such fees as may be prescribed the director of agricultural marketing or any other officer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 2024 (HC)

Deepak Kumar B Vs. Sahara Prime City Ltd

Court : Karnataka

..... tilak nagar police station, chembur tilak nagar mumbai-400089 3. the sain processing and weaving mills pvt. ltd., a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 having its office at3d floor, executive office hotel sahara star vile parle mumbai maharastra-400021 presently represented by its authorized signatory dwarakanath govind4 sri jageshwar ..... kapila marga siddarthanagar mysore-570011 petitioner (by sri l. srinivasa babu, advocate) and:1. sahara prime city ltd., a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 having its office at3d floor, executive office hotel sahara star vile parle mumbai maharastra-400021 presently represented by its authorized signatory sri k.b.nagaraj ..... rule 1 and 2 of cpc restraining defendants, their agents, servants or any persons acting on behalf of the defendants are restrained from alienating the suit schedule property either by their own acts or through the acts of such of those persons instructed by the defendants to anyone pending disposal of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 2024 (SC)

Union Of India Vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of discovery of mistake and, therefore, stands excluded, by operation of section 17(1)(c) of the limitation act, 1963 (act 21 of 1963) and that section 78-b has no application to the facts in this case. in consequence ..... the present case is one of overcharge or illegal charge ?. .... 76 a. applicability of section 106(3) of the railways act, 1989. .................. 76 b. whether the chargeable distance of 444 km was correct or not?. ........... 82 g. conclusion........................................................................................ 941 ..... of 95 f. analysis .............................................................................................. 22 i. relevant statutory scheme and provisions .............................................. 22 ii. scope of section 106 of the railways act, 1989 ........................................ 29 a. what is meant by an overcharge ?. ....................................................... 35 b. concept of an overcharge and an illegal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2024 (HC)

Raghava Construction India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Ferro Concrete Construction ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... favour someone; or whether the process adopted or decision made is so arbitrary and irrational that the court can say:"the decision is such that no responsible authority acting reasonably and in accordance with relevant law could have reached"; (ii) whether public interest is affected. if the answers are in the negative, there should ..... advocate for sri rakesh b.bhatt, advocate, advocate for r2) this writ appeal is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india and section4of the karnataka high court act, 1963 praying to pass a judgment and order, a) setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated06h of july, 2023 of the learned single bench of ..... no.100625/2023 and dismiss the writ petition. in writ appeal no.100567 of2023between: raghava construction india pvt. ltd., a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 2019. having registered office at, raghava pride, h.no.8-2-603/1/27 and28 road no.10, banjara hills, hyderabad-500034, represented herein by its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2024 (HC)

Tungabhdra Board Vs. Ferro Concrete Consruction (india) Pvt. Ltd.,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... favour someone; or whether the process adopted or decision made is so arbitrary and irrational that the court can say:"the decision is such that no responsible authority acting reasonably and in accordance with relevant law could have reached"; (ii) whether public interest is affected. if the answers are in the negative, there should ..... advocate for sri rakesh b.bhatt, advocate, advocate for r2) this writ appeal is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india and section4of the karnataka high court act, 1963 praying to pass a judgment and order, a) setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated06h of july, 2023 of the learned single bench of ..... no.100625/2023 and dismiss the writ petition. in writ appeal no.100567 of2023between: raghava construction india pvt. ltd., a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 2019. having registered office at, raghava pride, h.no.8-2-603/1/27 and28 road no.10, banjara hills, hyderabad-500034, represented herein by its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2024 (HC)

Sri. Jaganath. A. S. Vs. Smt. Madhushree D. S.

Court : Karnataka

..... motu or otherwise which, according to him, would lead to the truth. . 22. since the husband has made an application under section 45 of the indian evidence act for subjecting his wife to the medical examination by the medical board (which may consists of medical expert and psychiatrist), it may certainly offend the legal right of ..... 2003) 4 scc493 sharda v. dharmpal has taken into consideration the legal right of the spouse for securing divorce under section 13(1)(iii) of the hindu marriage act, 1955, wherein the court has also affirmed the action of the court in subjecting the spouse to undergo the medical examination, (while also analyzing the provisions of the ..... judgment of madras high court reported as air1975madras 285, r. lingaraj v. parvati, wherein the single judge of the madras high court while analyzing the provisions of lunacy act, 1912, has observed that the unsoundness of mind of a person, is one stage, which make him totally unsuited to manage himself and his affairs and such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2024 (HC)

Sri Janardhan S/o Shivappa Naik Vs. Smt Susheela W/o Gangadhar Naik

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... proviso attached to this section relaxes this requirement in case of a document, not being a will, but has been registered in accordance with the provisions of the registration act, 1908 unless its execution by the person by whom it purports to have been executed, is specifically denied. 22.2. these statutory provisions, thus, make it incumbent ..... form of attestation would be necessary.22. it cannot be gainsaid that the above legislatively prescribed essentials of a valid execution and attestation of a will under the act are mandatory in nature, so much so that any failure or deficiency in adherence thereto would be at the pain of invalidation of such document/instrument of ..... does not make any difference in proving execution of the will. the will might have been registered, but that does not prove the intention, willingness and voluntary act on part of the testator to execute the will and bequeathed the property in favour of dw.1. proof of execution of will is a component of proving .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 29 2024 (HC)

Masappa And Others Vs. Kallavva And Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... is registered will, but it is not a compulsorily registerable document whereas the sale deed is compulsorily registerable document as per section 17 of the indian registration act. therefore where in the case the registered sale deed is questioned unless it is annuled or set aside the registration of sale deed has the presumption of its ..... of attestation would be necessary.22. it cannot be gainsaid that the above legislatively prescribed essentials of a valid execution and attestation of a will under the act are mandatory in nature, so much so that any failure or deficiency in adherence thereto would be at the pain of invalidation of such document/instrument of ..... attached to this section relaxes this requirement in case of a document, not being a will, but has been registered in accordance with the provisions of the registration act, 1908 unless its execution by the person by whom it purports to have been executed, is specifically denied. 22.2. these statutory provisions, thus, make it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 29 2024 (HC)

Masappa S/o Hanamappa Kambali Vs. Kallavva W/o Ameenappa Warkal

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... is registered will, but it is not a compulsorily registerable document whereas the sale deed is compulsorily registerable document as per section 17 of the indian registration act. therefore where in the case the registered sale deed is questioned unless it is annuled or set aside the registration of sale deed has the presumption of its ..... of attestation would be necessary.22. it cannot be gainsaid that the above legislatively prescribed essentials of a valid execution and attestation of a will under the act are mandatory in nature, so much so that any failure or deficiency in adherence thereto would be at the pain of invalidation of such document/instrument of ..... attached to this section relaxes this requirement in case of a document, not being a will, but has been registered in accordance with the provisions of the registration act, 1908 unless its execution by the person by whom it purports to have been executed, is specifically denied. 22.2. these statutory provisions, thus, make it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2024 (HC)

Tata Aig General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Pramoda Chandra Sarkar

Court : Karnataka

..... bangalore-56037. respondents (by sri. adinarayan.,advocate for r1 to r4; sri. a. madhusudhan rao., advocate for r5.) this mfa is filed u/s301) of employee's compensation act against the judgment and award dated0303.2016 passed in eca no.70/2014 on the file of the xxi additional small cause judge, & xix acmm, member, mact, bangalore, ..... at 12% per annum and directed respondent no.2 - insurer to pay the compensation awarded. being aggrieved the present appeal is filed by the insurer. 3 hereinafter referred as 'act' - 4 - nc:2024. khc:7770 mfa no.3856 of 2016 5. learned counsel for the insurer vehemently contended that respondent no.1 - owner did not follow the ..... hence, in the said case, the policy insurance was a motor policy whereas in the present case the policy has been specifically issued under the provisions of the act. hence, the liability of the insurer under the present policy being contractual one, the actual wages of the deceased was required to be taken into consideration.20. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //