Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 7 liability for service outside india Sorted by: old Page 91 of about 6,544 results (0.324 seconds)

Apr 04 2001 (HC)

Ahshan Khan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : II(2001)DMC341; 2001(4)MPHT328; 2001(2)MPLJ383

..... of the prosecution to lead positive evidence of harassment during the period of 25 days after the couple, forgetting the past, had decided to live together and acting upon the settlement seema came with her husband to live with him. there is absolutely no evidence which may in any manner indicate that after coming back from her parent's ..... the appellant as well as the learned government advocate representing the state and have carefully perused the record.3. the appellant had been married with shahnaz bano alias seema. seema was found dead on 25-4-92 in her room which was locked from inside. she was aged about 19 years at that time while the present appellant ..... the roof. holding that seema had committed suicide and she had been harassed by her husband with the object to pressurise her to bring either a scooter from her parents or bring rs. 20,000/- in lieu thereof, the trial court with the aid of the presumption available under section 113a of the evidence act found the accused-appellant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2001 (HC)

Dinanath Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... his transferors as party respondents.8. in the case of gokul mahto' (supra), the hon'ble supreme court considered the provisions of sections 16, 17 and 18 of the act and has come to the conclusion that sub-clause (3) of section 16 cannot be applied to cases of gift. in that case the supreme court noticed that the ..... . 5 filed two separate petitions for pre-emption under section 16(3) of the bihar land reforms (fixation of ceiling area and acquisition of surplus land) act (hereinafter to be referred as 'the act') contending, inter alia, that being ad-joining raiyat of certain lands in question, he was entitled for pre-emption. these two application gave rise to ceiling ..... the deed of gift was made before 90 days, therefore, the same was hit by the provisions of the act. learned counsel for respondent no. 5 has failed to draw the attention of the court to any provision of the act, which restrains the purchaser to transfer his purchased land by gift before 90 days.on the contrary, sub-section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2001 (HC)

Sand Plast (India) Ltd. Vs. I.T.C. Bhadrachalam Finance and Investment ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2003(1)WLN81

..... support the contention that the company was commercially insolvent. the ruling has no application to the present case where clearly presumption under section 434(1)(a) of the act is available to the company-petitioner on admitted facts.24. the decision of a learned single judge of madras high court (lakshmanan j. as his lordship the ..... this is done, the presumption that the appellant-company was unable to pay its debt because of non-payment after the statutory notice under section 434 of the act, shall arise and prevail. it was also contended that the appellant-company is unnecessarily bringing in public interest element in a purely commercial and statutory matter. according ..... by m/s. sand plast (india) ltd., (hereinafter referred to as the 'appellant-company') which is a company registered under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 (in short 'the act') against an order dated 19.3.2001 admitting a petition for its winding up, filed by m/s. i.t.c bhadrachalam finance and investment ltd. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2001 (TRI)

Brahma Bazaz Inns (P) Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in : (2003)79TTJ(Pune.)342

..... industries jt "there is no unfettered discretion in public law. a public authority possesses powers only to use them for public good. this imposes the duty to act fairly and to adopt a procedure which is "fairplay in action". due observance of this obligation as part of good administration raises a reasonable or legitimate expectation in ..... the cit and the learned cit, after taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, allowed the assessee-company to make the payment by instalments. this act of the cit indicates that he had recognised the weak financial position of the assessee-company. later on, of course, the cit withdrew the arrangement, but had ..... and not merely accidental.the imposition of penalty under section 221 is within the discretion of the ao. the expression "may direct" in section 221 of the act indicates that imposition of penalty is not mandatory, but the same is discretionary. however, the exercise of discretion is not to be arbitrary, but is dependent on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2001 (HC)

A. Sarabanu Vs. A.M.A. Asmathullah (Died) by His L.Rs. and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2001)3MLJ408

..... allahabad reported in nutan kumar and ors. v. iind additional district judge, hande and ors. the learned judges, while defining the term void in relation to a juristic act, to mean without legal force, effect or consequences: not binding: invalid: null: worthless: cipher: useless: and in effectual etc. have stated thus in paragraphs 22 and ..... development authority v. daulat mal jain wherein it has been held that a sale which was opposed to public policy was void under section 23 of the contract act, 1872, and that consequently, the respondents therein acquired no right, title or interest either under the sale deeds or agreements entered into by them with the ..... the benefit of the minor. the said violation being one which is wholly unprincipled and would lead to the conclusion that the first respondent committed a distrustful act against the interest of the minor which would never be condoned. the said violation having been established and when could be characterised as a fraudulent one, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2001 (HC)

Kaila Devi Vs. Kishan Lal Meena

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : II(2002)ACC606; 2002(1)WLC620

..... the statutory liability only which was found to be correct.16. there are number of authorities wherein it has been settled that before the amendment in the motor vehicles act, the liability of the insurance company is limited to the extent of statutory liability and as such in the present case the award of the tribunal wherein the ..... (2) of section 95 of the act.11. so is the position in the case of smt. rajendra kumari and anr. v. smt. shanta trivedi and ors. : [1989]1scr761 , who was a passenger in ..... comprehensively insured, the claimant had sustained injuries, it was held that prior to amendment of 1969 the insurance was liable to such amount as provided in the motor vehicles act. no additional amount was paid of premium and thus liability and the policy in the instant case was same as statutory liability contemplated under clause (b) of sub-section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2001 (HC)

M/S. Mmtc Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)1103; 92(2001)DLT465; 2002(61)DRJ686; 2001(76)ECC140; 2001(133)ELT310(Del)

..... infirmity on the issue relating the exemptions.10. so far as the question regarding levy of penalty is concerned, it was urged that conditions under section 112 of the act were not complied with. we find that in the grounds of appeal before the tribunal which were filed before tribunal no specific stand was taken except generally stating that ..... part of record of the present case, and in fact no such condition can be prescribed in a warehousing bond in view of section 59(3) of the custom act, 1962, which provides that where any goods are transferred by the owner of a bonded warehouse to another person, the authorities shall obtain a bond for the transferred goods ..... itself. 5. whether the finding by the hon'ble tribunal that 'm/s. mmtc had also executed bond with nepz customs under the warehousing provisions of the 'customs act, and had undertaken to satisfy the customs authorities that the gold imported by them will be utilized for export as per scheme of export of gold jewellery by units in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2001 (HC)

Kalia Devi and ors. Vs. Kishan Lal Meena and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2003ACJ897

..... the statutory liability only which was found to be correct.16. there are number of authorities wherein it has been settled that before the amendment in the motor vehicles act, the liability of the insurance company is limited to the extent of statutory liability and as such in the present case the award of the tribunal wherein the accident ..... -section (2) of section 95 of the act.11. so is the position in the case of rajendra kumari v. shanti trivedi 1989 acj 517 (sc), who was a passenger in the hired car. it had collided ..... insured, the claimant had sustained injuries, it was held that prior to the amendment of 1969 the insurance company was liable to such amount as provided in the motor vehicles act. no additional amount was paid of premium and thus the liability and the policy in the instant case was same as statutory liability contemplated under clause (b) of sub .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 2001 (HC)

Ram Babu Gupta and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3363

..... p.c. the first question stands answered thus.18. coming to the second question noted above it is to be at once stated that a provision empowering a court to act in a particular manner and a provision creating a right for an aggrieved person to approach a court or authority, must be understood distinctively and should not be mixed up ..... 154, 155, sub-sections (1) and (2) of s.. 156, cr. p.c. confer right on an aggrieved person to reach the police, section 156(3) empowers a magistrate to act in a particular manner in a given situation. therefore, it is not possible to hold that where a bare application is moved before court only praying for exercise of powers .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2001 (HC)

Bhagwania Vs. State Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3719

..... certificate ex. p/11, this witness is deaf and dumb by birth and, therefore, the learned trial judge took the help of section 119 of the indian evidence act and proceeded further under that section and this witness was not administered oath and on being asked, she only uttered the words (vernacu lar matter omitted) and by saying ..... .25. it is well settled that although legally there is no bar to accept the uncorroborated testimony of a child witness yet prudence requires that courts should not act on the uncorroborated evidence of a child whether sworn or unsworn. this was so held by their lordship of the privy council in mohamed sugal esa mamasan rer ..... to an adult, goes only to the credibility of the witness and not his competency. the question of competency is dealt with in section 118 of the indian evidence act. every witness is competent unless the court considers he is prevented from understanding the questions put to him, or from giving rational answers, by reason of tender years, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //