Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 16TH MAGHA 193 WP(Crl.).No. 18 of 2013 (S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- YAHIA MOHAMED HANEEFA AGED 4 YEARS S/O.SULAIMAN, ADHIL APARTMENTS, NGO QUARTERS MAITHRIPURAM ROAD, THRIKKAKARA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT021. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL V.MOHAMMED RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE COLLEGE JUNCTION, PATHANAMTHITTA 68 645.2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PANDALAM, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT501. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PANDALAM POLICE STATION PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT501. 4. YOUSUFF H S/O.HAMEED, KOODATHINAL KIZHAKKETHIL, FATHIMA MANZIL THONNALLUR P.O, PANDALAM, PATHANAMTHITTA 68 501 PRESENTLY AT P.B 28659.RABUWA, RIYAD 11447 5. SOUDHAMMAL W/O.ANSARI, KOODATHINAL, THONNALLUR P.O PANDALAM, PATHANAMTHITTA 68 501. R1,2,3 BY ADV. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PRO...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... : " i) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to issue registration certificate as prescribed under section 23 of the indian medical council act 1956 and regulation 64 of the indian medical council registration 2000 to the petitioner as applied for under ext.p4 forthwith; ii) direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... the same day delivered the following: w.p.(c)no. 16898 of 201.appendix petitioners' exhibits: ext.p1 : true copy of the identity card together with registration certificate under fss act, 2006 ext.p2 ; true copy of the street vendor (protection of livelihood and regulation of street vending) bill, 2012. /true copy/ p.s. to judge. p.r. ramachandra menon, j .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... maternity leave salary form 04.10.2010 to 01.04.2011 without any hindrance. d) declare that ext.p8 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the provisions of the maternity benefit act, 1961 (act 53 of 1961); w.a.no.824 o 2. (e) declare that the provisions of rules 100 and 101 and notes thereto, part-i, to the extent of ..... , the sanction of maternity leave came to be denied and according to the appellant, it is against the provisions of maternity benefit w.a.no.824 o 4. act of 1961 and the respondent-university ought not to have rejected the same while other sister universities like kerala university and m.g.university are in the practice of granting ..... with retrospective effect, i.e. from 01.09.2010; (f) declare that the state of kerala has no authority and competency to frame rules against the maternity benefit act 1961 (act 53 of 1961), a central legislation, depriving the right of women employees of the state of kerala. (g) declare that the 6th respondent is not entitled to continue .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... us on the issue of interpretation of the definition of "family" as provided under article 42(i) read with explanation of the schedule to the kerala stamp act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as "the stamp act"). though we appreciate the tenacity, we cannot but underline the futility since the issue is no longer res integra. we have clearly interpreted the definition in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... state of kerala under service quota, it shall be made only under the provisions of the service quota act. according to the state, majority of the population in the state primarily consist of common people, who depend on public health care system, which is manned ..... then selection is purely based on seniority in view of the kerala medical officers admission to post graduate courses under service quota act, 2008 (act 29 of 2008) (hereinafter referred to as 'the service quota act). therefore, writ petitioner challenges exhibit p6 as ultra vires to statutory regulation of medical council of india (mci) in total violation ..... weightage for rural and difficult rural service etc. by referring to section 3 and 4 of the service quota act, it is contended that, according to the scheme of the act, notwithstanding anything contained in mci act or any rule, regulation so far as selection of medical officers for admission to post graduate study in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... 24. with regard to the above contention of mr.pallav shishodia, it is enough to say that it overlooks section 3(cc) and section 3(e) of the act, substituted by act 68 of 1984. the definition of "company" in section 3(e) after substitution in 1984 is as follows:3. e) the expression 'company' means- (i) ..... houses for the workmen employed by a company or for provision of amenities directly connected with it, such acquisition is permitted by invoking the provisions of the act. similarly if after enquiry, the government are satisfied that the acquisition is needed for constitution of some building or work for a company, which is engaged ..... land for public purposes. paragraph 8 reads as under: "explanation.- 'private company' and 'government company' shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in the companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956). a plain reading of the fascicule of these provisions clearly indicates the distinction, statute has envisaged, namely, acquisition for a public purpose and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... as stated earlier, it is too late for the appellant to contend that the first respondent is not entitled to any benefits under section 25(f) of the act. the said question as to whether the workman is entitled to be said benefits has already been decided in op4814of 1991 between the same parties. this judgment will ..... p4814of 1981 and after hearing the appellant management; the court came to the conclusion that this very workman was entitled to the protection of section 25(f) of the act. this judgment was an elaborate judgment to which the appellant was a party. subsequently, the workman filed another writ petition seeking reinstatement in op5646of 1986 and that was ..... i.e, termination of the vacancy. by the said judgment, liberty was also reserved to approach the labour court under section 33 c(2) of the i d act for computation of the monetary value due to him.2. subsequently, again, when the petitioner was before this court claiming reinstatement into service, this court by ext.p2 judgment .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... 03.2012. it is not clear as to why the petitioner has waited for more than one year after the receipt of the information under the right to information act to approach this court. however, in the circumstances of any real public interest being projected, the delay may not be very wp(c).no.15237 of 2013-s ..... - counsel for the petitioner. the offending amendments, according to the petitioner, have been revealed in exhibit p8, which is a document received under the right to information act. the learned counsel for the petitioner also points out specific instances in the said document to urge the contention that loss has been caused to the public exchequer. we ..... of public exchequer and the amendments were essentially challenged as violative of articles 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution as also the provisions of the indian contract act and the guidelines at exhibit p1. reference was first made to exhibit p1, wherein guidelines to be followed by the major port trust for private sector participation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... any other appropriate writ, direction or order, commanding the 1st respondent to initiate appropriate legal actions against the 5th respondent as contemplated u/s.13 and 23 of the act, on the basis of ext.p6 representation. iii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the 1st respondent to consider ext. ..... p6 representation and pass appropriate orders as provided u/s.13 and 23 of the kerala conservation of paddy land and wet land act, 2008, as expeditiously as possible within a specified time as fixed by this hon'ble court. iv) grant such other and further reliefs, which this hon'ble ..... illegal w.p.(c)no. 23373 of20132 actions being pursued by the 5th respondent by converting his paddy land for rubber cultivation violating the provisions of the act 28 of 2008. the grievance of the petitioner has already been projected before the district collector by way of ext.p6 representation, which is still to be .....
Tag this Judgment!