Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 7 liability for service outside india Court: rajasthan Page 10 of about 111 results (0.141 seconds)

Manohar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... . this is particularly so when section 220 (6) deals expressly with a situation when an appeal is pending before the appellate assistant commissioner, but the act is silent in that behalf when an appeal is pending before the appellate tribunal. it could well be said that when section 254 confers appellate jurisdiction, ..... servants and constitutional functionaries. in the case of a government servant/or functionary who cannot under the conditions of his service/or office, by his own unilateral act of tendering resignation, give up his service/or office, normally, the tender of resignation becomes effective and his service/or office-tenure terminated, when it ..... resulted in severance of employer- employee relationship forthwith on 18.1.2006.) for the same reason, the principle underlying section 19 of the transfer of property act is not attracted.42. the general principle that emerges from the foregoing conspectus, is that in the absence of anything to the contrary in the provisions .....

Abdul Hamid and ors Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... capture parliament house with the aid of sophisticated arms and powerful explosives. the business of parliament too was in currency when the attack was made. the act was to subvert functions of the government and de-stabilise indian society. the undoubted objective and determination of the assailants was to impinge sovereignty of indian ..... were subjected to trial for several offences prescribed under chapter-vi of indian penal code and for the offences prescribed under the terrorists and disruptive activities (prevention) act, 1987. hon'ble the apex court in length discussed the term wage war against government . and held as under:- 23.the trial court has convicted ..... mathur,j.) reportable being questioned correctness of the judgment dated 28.4.2012 passed by the court of learned special judge, sc/st (prevention of atrocities) act cases, jodhpur in sessions case no.36/2010, this appeal is before us. by the judgment impugned learned trial judge convicted the accused appellants for the offences .....

Geeta Devi and Others Vs. Dr. Surendramal Mertiya and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... this regard was necessary for the purpose of alleged attornment. 20. besides the above, the definition of landlord under section 2(c) of the rajasthan rent control act, 2001 ('the act') reads as under:- "(c) 'landlord' means any person who for the time being is receiving or is entitled to receive the rent of any premises, whether ..... be made by any court having jurisdiction to entertain a suit for the possession of the property leased." 10. the said proviso to section 109 of the tp act coupled with the settled legal position that the attornment in favour of transferee is automatic and it requires no consent of the lessee only entitles the transferee to ..... landlord, dr. surendramal mertiya, continued to receive the rent from the tenant and, therefore, his right to seek eviction as 'landlord' as defined under the rent control act, 1950 continued irrespective of his transfer of suit property by way of gift, and the present second appeal of tenant deserves dismissal. the reasons are as follows. 8. .....

Om Prakash Vs. Smt. Sashi and Anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.646/2011 Om Prakash Vs. Smt.Shashi & Anr. Order, Monday, dated 21.09.2015. 1/39 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. :: JUDGMENT :: S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.646/2011 Om Prakash s/o Rajaram Vs. Smt.Shashi w/o Late Narendra Kumar & Anr. Date of Order ::: Monday, 21st September, 2015. PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr.R.R.Nagori, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Alkesh Agarwal and Mr.V.L.Thanvi, for the defendant-appellant. Mr.Ashok Chhangani for the plaintiffs-respondents. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT (ORAL) :- 1. The defendant-Om Prakash has filed the present first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the plaintiffs/decree-holders Smt.Shashi w/o Late Shri Narendra Kumar and her son Shailendra, aggrieved by the decree of possession dated 13.12.1999 in Civil Original Suit S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.646/2011 Om Prakash Vs. Smt.Shashi & Anr. Order, Monday, dated 21.09.2015. 2/39 No.120/89 Smt.Shas...

Ram Narayan Singh @ NaraIn Singh, Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj590

..... wrongful restraint. three accused were present on spot and the role of three accused may be different, but they actively participated in committing robbery, therefore, their act in participation on spot proves their presence not only near to the victim so as to put them in fear of instant death. section 394 ipc provides ..... were ultimately committed by some of them, without the participation of others. those who committed the offences pursuant to the conspiracy by indulging in various overt acts will be individually liable for those offences in addition to being liable for criminal conspiracy; but, the non-participant conspirators cannot be found guilty of the ..... the hon'ble supreme court while considering the scope of section 121a ipc held that those who committed offences pursuant to conspiracy by indulging in various overt acts will be individually liable for those offences in addition to being liable for criminal conspiracy, but the non-participant conspirators cannot be found guilty of the .....

D.R. Kalla and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1998(2)WLC169; 1997(2)WLN550

..... provide for a detailed procedure in respect of suspension and conducting the disciplinary proceedings. the said requirements have to be complied with and concerned authorities have to act in accordance to the procedure provided in the said appendices.20. in view of the above, all the petitions are dismissed with a direction that the ..... a considered decision. even if stayed at one stage, the decision may require reconsideration if the criminal case gets unduly delayed.18. a writ court cannot act as 'an appellate forum de hors the limitations of judicial review while considering the quashing of suspension order and charges and even at the threshold'. (vide ..... the contrary.9. in the instant case, the provisions of rule 13 of the rajasthan civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules, 1958, hereinafter called the act, 1958'. rule 13 reads as under:13. suspension.--(1) the appointing authority or any authority to which it is subordinate or any other authority empowered by the .....

Shanker Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2002(2)WLN470

..... iii) non-production of younger sister of the prosecutrix is fatal to the prosecution case and also he argued that the accused' appellant should be acquitted or benefit of act of 1986 should be given to the accused appellant on point of sentence. 8. on the contrary, the learned public prosecutor has opposed the submissions made by the learned ..... seen.25. it is well settled that although legally there is no bar to accepting the uncorroborated testimony of a child witness yet prudence requires that courts should not act on the uncorroborated evidence of a child whether sworn or unsworn. this was so held by their lordship of the privy council in mohamed sugal esa mamasan rer ..... vitiated. in my opinion, the learned counsel for the accused appellant has not read the full judgment. that judgment was passed under the provisions of west bengal act, 1959 and in that act as per provision of section 2d 'child' means a person who has not attained the age of 18 years, but position in the present case is .....

Balwant Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2004(1)Raj637; 2003(4)WLC648

..... prompt the act. mysterious is the working 6f human mind. it is, indeed, a fact that motive underlies almost every offence, but the motives of men are often deep unfathomable and their number ..... record from this angle also. in a criminal trial failure to prove a motive does not necessarily mean that there was no motive for the crime. the circumstances of an act being apparently motiveless is not a ground from which the existence of a powerful or irresistible influence or homicidal tendency can be inferred. motives exist unknown and innumerable which might .....

Shanker Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1608

..... v. state of punjab, (1991) 2 crimes 191, may be referred to.27. thus, it can be concluded that :--(1) as a general rule, a court can and may act on the testimony if a single witness, though uncorroborated. one credible witness outweight the testimony of a number of other witnesses of indifferent character.(2) unless corroboration is insisted upon ..... supreme court in jagdish prasad v. state of m.p., 1995 scc (cri) 160 : 1994 cri lj 1106, has held that testimony of a solitary witness can be acted upon, if entirely reliable and corroboration is required only in case of doubt or suspicion.26. it is settled law that corroboration is not rule of law, but one of ..... court in sarwan singh v. state of punjab, air 1976 sc 2304 : 1976 cri lj 1757.quality not quantity of evidence material.23. section 134 of the indian evidence act enshrines the well recognised maxim, that 'evidence has to be weighed not counted'. the matter thus depends upon the circumstances of each case and the quality of evidence even .....

Jodhpur City Bus Owners Union Vs. State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj517

..... number of representations received after finalization of the report of the review committee, from the transport operators and public for making amendments in the act. the draft of the proposals based on the recommendations of the review committee and representations from the public were placed before the transport development ..... has been incorporated to operate and manage the public transport system with private sector participation in jodhpur city. the company is incorporated under the companies act, 1956. the company shall be under the chairmanship collector of the municipal corporation/council of the respective area. the management of the company ..... despite knowing that in the state of rajasthan, there is a rajasthan state road transport corporation established under section 3 of the road transport corporation act 1950 alone is state transport undertaking, wrongly submitted that by constituting jctsl or other company, any state transport undertaking has been constituted by the state .....