Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 66 remission of deductions Page 100 of about 1,469 results (0.200 seconds)

Jul 07 1995 (HC)

V.N. Sharma and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1116; 1995(34)DRJ298; 1995RLR524

..... to discharge the accused. (4)that in exercising his jurisdiction under section 227 of the code the judge which under the present code is a senior and experienced court cannot act merely as a post-office or a mouth- piece of the prosecution, but has to consider the broad probabilities of the case, the total effect of the evidence and the ..... action for demanding dowry.(3) the main grievance of the petitioners is that none of them is either residing in the same premises or are responsible for any of the acts alleged against the husband, father-in-law or sister-in-law. one of the four petitioners has since died, who was uncle of the husband. out of the other three .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2001 (HC)

Parshadi and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 93(2001)DLT436

..... framework to respondent to the diverse need of local population; sub para change to reorient the housing agencies at the central, state and level to act more as promoters of housing activity rather than builders of houses and to concentrate increasingly on the supply of developed land and infrastructure, extension of appropriate ..... the high court in exercise of its jurisdiction under article 226, where the aggrieved party seeks relief against infringement of civil rights by authorities purporting to act in exercise of the powers conferred upon them by revenue statues. the preliminary objection raised by counsel for the assessed must thereforee fail.' thereforee, it ..... delhi development authority as a successor body to delhi improvement trust. these lands are managed as per provisions of the nazul agreement 1937 and punjab land revenue act, 1887. the receipts and expenditure relating to these nazul estates are being booked under a separate section of accounts called 'nazul account-i'. (b) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2000 (HC)

Gopal Singh Vs. Indian Railway Const. Company Ltd.(ircon)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ845Del

..... the seniority, the employees, whose services were terminated, would be provided with employment. the learned senior counsel submitted that the ircon, being a public authority, had acted in larger public interest keeping in view the money spent by the public ex- chequer and the interest of the employees, including the petitioners. 109. in making ..... the ircon being a construction company, it could issue the orders of termination on the terms found in the orders issued under section 25-fff of the industrial disputes act, 1947. 107. the learned senior counsel for the petitioners, mr.sudhir chandra, relied upon the judgment of the supreme court in 'lal mohammad & others vs ..... submitted that the dadri project is neither a factory involved in manufacturing process nor an establishment to which provisions of section 25-n of the industrial disputes act, 1947 would apply. it is further submitted that mere length of service would not give any right to the petitioners for regularisation unless there is a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2004 (HC)

Devika Mehra Vs. Ameeta Mehra

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT811; 2004(77)DRJ651

..... the valuation done without asking for any contribution from the parties.8. the arbitrator's award impugned in this petition raising objections under section 34 of the arbitration act cannot be considered in isolation merely by reference to the agreement dated 21st june 2003 but has to be construed in the context of the family relationship, ..... was an arbitration agreement or not:-'a. existence of disputes as against intention to avoid future disputes;b. the tribunal or forum so chosen is intended to act judicially after taking into account relevant evidence before it and the submission made by the parties before it; andc. the decision is intended to bind the parties.'(8 ..... his impartiality.(ii) that the arbitrator being a stud partner in a greentree stud did not disclose this to the petitioner as required under section 12 of the act.(iii) that the said partnership in greentree stud still continues.(iv) that this was further evident from the fact that certain assets belonging to usha stud farm .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 1998 (HC)

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. P. U. R. Polyurethene Products (P) ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1999)64TTJ(Del)507

..... order of the learned commissioner (appeals) on the issue.5. the second ground of appeal relates to the relief allowed on account of addition made under s. 43b of the act. before us it was conceded by the learned departmental representative that the issue is to be decided in the light of the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2009 (HC)

Kantibhai Valjibhai Shah Vs. Kokilaben Wd/O. Haribhai Ambalal Patel an ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2009)3GLR2416

..... having limited liability. in insurance policy exh.127 there is no specific condition incorporated which suggests limited liability. merely referring section that section suggests act policy, claims tribunal has decided question of liability of insurance company. but it is not a case of insurance company before claims tribunal, mehsana ..... - policy - limits of liability of insurance company - policy covering higher risk for which the insurance company had charged additional premium more than the premium payable for 'act only' policy - insurance company failed to explain for what purpose higher premium was charged - whether the liability of insurance company was limited as per statute - held: ..... tariff advisory in respect to commercial vehicle schedule of premium for passenger carrying vehicle including passengers risk liability to public risk is rs. 240/- and act only liability is rs. 200/- to be paid by insured to insurance company. he submitted that insured-owner has paid rs. 240/-. liability .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 2008 (HC)

Shahjanand Education Trust Vs. Hemchandracharya North Gujarat Universi ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)3GLR2475

..... the judgment in the case of bharuch jilla adarsh samaj seva mandal [supra] such as the institution fulfil all the conditions specified by the ncte act, the rules, regulations, the norms and standards laid down for the relevant teacher education/programmes/course, grant of recognition or permission subject to appointment of ..... and standards for recognition of teacher education, programmes and permission to start new course or training) regulations, 1995, and the relevant provisions under the university act with regard to grant of affiliation, the hon'ble supreme court in the aforesaid decision of state of maharashtra v. sant dnyaneshwar shikshan shastra mahavidyalaya and ..... facilities and has fulfilled all other requirements. it is required to be noted that ncte is a statutory expert body. considering the scheme of the ncte act and the relevant regulations, i.e., 'national council for teacher education (form of application for recognition, the time limit for submission of application, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2002 (HC)

M.V. Asean Jade Vs. Jaisu Shipping Com. Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR2000Guj241

..... under article 215 of the constitution of india, as superior courts of record having inherent and plenary jurisdiction including admiralty jurisdiction and not under the colonial court of admiralty act, 1890.5.15. it was further submitted that the bombay high court (original side) rules, 1957 are repealed by 1993 rules. even otherwise, the bombay high ..... court (original side) rules, 1957 and the admiralty jurisdiction rules for regulating the procedure and practice in cases brought before the high court under the colonial courts of admiralty act, 1890 (53-54 victoria chapter 27). rule 52 reads as follows :'52. where not provided for, rules and practice of o.o.c. j. to apply ..... the letters patent, these rules include rules regulating the procedure and practices of cases brought before the high court of bombay under the colonial courts of admiralty act, 1890. this is the law in force immediately before the appointed day with respect to the practice and procedure in the high court of bombay and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2004 (HC)

Yashwant Venilal Sanghvi Vs. Sahdevsinh Dilubha Zala

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2006)3GLR1873

..... in the memo of petition and in the booklet jagrut parivar but now the petitioners have realised that they have to face prosecution because of their illegal act of preparing, publishing, editing, circulating and dispatching defamatory material by publishing the booklet jagrut parivar and therefore they are saying that they have not published the ..... -down their heads before respondent no.2 and to unconditionally surrender themselves. as per petitioners, the main purpose of launching this prosecution is nothing but an act of monstrosity by creating an atmosphere of fear and terror against them whereas the other oblique purpose is to see that the petitioners are forced to come ..... opinion was prejudicial to the furtherance of the cause itself should be discouraged and therefore the petitioners did not submit to her dictates and they preferred to act as per the dictates of their consciences.13. it is also emphasised in the petition that resultant situation was invisible hand of respondent no.2 in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 1993 (HC)

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. the Central Industrial Tribunal a ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1993)IILLJ26Raj; 1993(1)WLC364

..... too helps the respondent. we are not entering into this controversy and in the facts and circumstances of the case, we do feel that under section 17(b) of the act he, must be permitted to draw full back wages at the rate wages last drawn by him till the disposal of this appeal.5. we, therefore, modify the stay-order ..... the authorities cited before us. an absolute stay, in our opinion, is neither permissible nor can be granted, in the light of the provisions of section 17(b) of the act. the legislature clearly intended that workman should not be permitted to starve because the other party wants to take further proceedings by way of appeal or otherwise. it is a ..... as it could not be granted by this court, even ex-party, in view of the mandatory provisions of section 17(b) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (here-in-after referred to as 'the act of 1947'). his contention is that in the instant case, the respondent has been facing litigation ever since 1988 till the dale. it was after .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //