Court : Supreme Court of India
..... a dispute which ended in a compromise but notwithstanding the compromise the allottee raised a dispute under the relevant provisions of the madhya pradesh cooperative societies act, 1960. when the dispute was pending, the allottee moved the registering officer for the cancellation of the deed of transfer executed in favour of ..... factual investigation; and (ii) the limited scope of the enquiry that could be conducted by the registering authority under sections 32 to 34 of the registration act, 1908. 2739. in support of the 1st contention, the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents relied upon the following decisions, (i) thansingh nathmal ..... between authentication and registration is spelt out very clearly in the tamilnadu registration rules. it may be noted here that section 69(1) of the registration act, 1908, empowers the inspector general of registration (i) to exercise general superintendence over all the registration offices in the territories 15 under the state government .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... universities and institutions in india under section 35 and recognition of medical qualifications granted by medical institutions outside india, under section 36. section 36 of the act reads as follows: 36. recognition of medical qualifications granted by medical institutions outside india. (1) where an authority in any country outside india, ..... the medical qualification from foreign medical institution or has obtained admission in foreign medical institution before the commencement of the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001 shall not be required to obtain eligibility certificate under this sub section but, if he is qualified for admission to any medical course ..... states not included in the first schedule; and (iii) those granted by medical institutions outside those states.13. the first schedule to the 1933 act included indian universities and the second schedule included institutions in countries like united kingdom, australia, burma, canada etc. it may be of interest to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... ; united india insurance co. ltd. v great eastern shipping co. ltd 5. in hira lal (supra), this court, after considering section 4 of the marine insurance act, held as follows: 17. in view of the insurance cover extending `warehouse to warehouse' the consignments are covered by insurance not only during the sea journey, but ..... is irretrievably deprived thereof, there is an actual total loss.20. it is also relevant to note at this stage that section 2 (13a) of the insurance act, 1938 too defines marine insurance expansively. it reads as follows: (13a) marine insurance business means the business of effecting contracts of insurance upon vessels of any description ..... a domestic insurer, reflected the statutory mandate which 6 arose in this case by virtue of section 2(c)(b) of the insurance act, 1938 (hereinafter, act ) and section 25 of the nationalization act. it was also urged that arguendo, if it were to be held that there was no legal obligation, nevertheless, clause 47 contemplated .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... . attorney general of canada39 to elaborate on the precautionary principle, as a foundational approach to decision-making under uncertainty, that points to the importance of acting on the best available information to protect the health of the citizens. in four aviation security service employees (supra), which dealt with restrictions placed on ..... impugned order, requiring police and defence force personnel to be vaccinated, placed unjustified limitation on the rights protected by the new zealand bill of rights act 1990 (hereinafter, the nz bill of rights ), particularly the right to refuse to undergo medical treatment, the right to manifest religion, the right ..... court in south bay united pentecostal church v. newsom13 wherein it was recognised that courts must grant elected representatives broad discretion when they undertake to act in areas fraught with medical and scientific uncertainties.18. biden v. missouri (supra) related to vaccine mandates for healthcare providers. the secretary of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... respondent insurance company repudiated the appellant s claim by placing reliance on the exclusion clause in the policy regarding loss or damage caused by the acts of terrorism. therefore, the appellant filed the complaint mentioned above before the commission complaining about deficiency in the service offered by the respondent insurance company ..... , resulting from or in connection with any action taken in controlling, preventing, suppressing or in any way relating to action taken in respect of any act of terrorism. (emphasis added) 7. shri santosh kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, submitted that the police had registered a first information ..... the parties. therefore, the parties cannot rely upon the definitions of terrorism in various penal statutes since the exclusion clause contains an exhaustive definition of acts of terrorism. 914. thus, the commission committed an error by applying the exclusion clause. moreover, the policy specifically covers the damage to the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... , unlike the other similarly situated licensees, could not successfully operationalize the services and subsequently, obtained an interim order by filing a petition under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. the respondent did not take any steps to refer the matter to arbitration. mr. joshi also found fault with the order passed by the tribunal wherein 11 | pa ge ..... directed the appellant to keep the bank guarantee alive.4. on 02.01.2006, the respondent filed a petition under section 14a(1) of the telecom regulatory authority of india act, 1997 before the telecom disputes settlement and appellate tribunal (for short tribunal ) for the following reliefs : (a) declare that petitioners delay in commencing broadcast on 29.08.2002 is 5 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... and it would be open to the convict to seek appropriate directions from the court.1225. that the prisoners convicted of murder after rape, under pocso act, convicted for multiple murders whether in single case or several cases, dacoity with murder and murder after kidnapping for ransom, may be considered by the competent ..... a citizen of india.1224. the following categories of prisoners shall not be eligible for release on furlough: i. prisoners convicted under sedition, terrorist activities and ndps act. 12 ii. prisoners whose immediate presence in the society may be considered dangerous or otherwise prejudicial to public peace and order by the district magistrate of his ..... . we are also satisfied that the victims were helpless and undefended. taking into consideration all the facts and materials, it is crystal clear that the entire act of atbir amounts to barbaric and inhuman behaviour of the highest order. the manner in which the murder was carried out in the present case is extremely .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... acquired the medical qualification from foreign medical institution or has obtained admission in foreign medical institution before the commencement of the indian medical council (amendment) act, 2001 shall not be required to obtain eligibility certificate under this sub-section but, if he is qualified for admission to any medical course for ..... after obtaining the primary medical qualification followed by completion of such practical training as prescribed either in india or abroad as per the provisions of the act; xx xx xx (f) primary medical qualification means a medical qualification awarded by any medical institution outside india which is a recognized qualification for ..... , the student is not eligible for provisional registration to undergo one year internship so as to be eligible for registration as a professional under the act. the argument 10 is that clinical training cannot be imparted through online mode as it is the actual training involving diagnosis and interactions with the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... state as we have noticed. the government order which would appear to be a government order in the undivided state of madhya pradesh continued in terms of the reorganisation act. such government orders of the undivided state of madhya pradesh would undoubtedly continue to hold the field till it was revoked in the manner known to law. the division ..... the division bench set aside the judgment of the learned single judge. findings of the division bench to be noted are as follows: 14. the state respondent did not act fairly, reasonably and responsibly in the matter. a decision had already been taken at the highest level of the government on 14.5.2009. it was understood in clear ..... guard on the same day. the appellants were originally part of undivided state of madhya pradesh. 1 ca no.3504/ 2022 etc. upon the enactment of the state reorganisation act, 2000, a new state viz., state of chhattisgarh was born on 01.11.2000. while the state of madhya pradesh was undivided, state of madhya pradesh, on 17 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... are monitored by security agencies from time to time.2. mtnl is a central government corporation established under the provisions of section 4 of the indian telegraph act, 1885 and possession of the land and building or part thereof belonging to mtnl cannot be taken without prior sanction of the government concerned i.e. central ..... government . please note that mtnl, is a central government established under the provisions of section 4 of the indian telegraph act, 1885. considering the status of mtnl, being central government corporation 3 ca no.6745 of2009established under the law, you are not entitled to take the possession of ..... taken as aforesaid without the previous sanction of the government concerned and when, the land or building is vested in any corporation constituted by royal charter or by an act of parliament, (of the united kingdom), or (by an indian law) possession shall not be taken as aforesaid without the previous sanction of (the state) .....
Tag this Judgment!