Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Sorted by: recent Court: kolkata Page 7 of about 2,351 results (0.148 seconds)

May 07 2012 (HC)

Sas Investments Fiduciary Ltd. Vs. the Official Liquidator, High

Court : Kolkata

..... mr.bimal chatterjee, sr.advocate, mr.deepnath roy chowdhury, advocate for creditors the court : it is necessary that the orders sought on the application under section 466 of the companies act be advertised so that the contributories of the company in liquidation and all creditors of the company in liquidation may be made aware of the same and may be invited ..... the matter appear as an adjourned company matter . in the monthly list of july, 2012. in view of the above order made on the application under section 466 of the act in c.a.no.654 of 2007, let the connected matters being c.a.no.410 of 2008 and c.a.no.515 of 2009 also appear along with c .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2012 (HC)

Smt. Sadhana Das Vs. State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

..... in air 1994 sc 2623, can well be taken for consideration. the honble apex court culled out the principles relating to the ambit and scope of amending act as follows: (i) a statute which affects substantive rights is presumed to be prospective in operation, unless made retrospective, either expressly or by necessary intendment, whereas a ..... sub-section (2) of section 197 of the code of criminal procedure shall apply to all sub-ordinate ranks of police force, enrolled or appointed under the police act, 1861 charged with the maintenance of public order. mr. banerjee contended that by virtue of this gazette notification, the provisions of section 197 of the code of ..... his official duties. .. .. committing of an offence of murder can never be a part of an official duty. where there is no necessary connection between the act and the performance of the duties of a public servant, section 197 of the code will not be attracted. merciless beating by a police officer causing death of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2012 (HC)

Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers Ltd. Vs. Second Industrial Tri ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2012(3)LLN199(DB)

..... and employment, govt. of india has no authority to declare central government as the appropriate government in respect of the appellant company under the ndustrial disputes act, 1947 unless it is established that the appellant company carries on the industry under the authority of the central government. 21. from the memorandum of understanding, ..... or control over the company or the undertaking through appointment of directors are not relevant factors to decide the question of appropriate government under the industrial disputes act. 13. an industry may be an agency or instrumentality of the central government but in order to attract the provisions of section 2 (a) (i ..... national union water front workers and ors., reported in air 2001 sc 3527. 9. upon considering the provisions of section 2 (a) of the industrial disputes act, constitution bench of the honble supreme court held :- 23. an analysis of this provision shows that the central government will be the appropriate government in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2012 (HC)

Dipak Kumar Himatsingka Vs. Jyotsana Rajgarhia and Another

Court : Kolkata

..... application of mind concluded that there was sufficient cause to condone the delay. fifthly, the hon'ble court did not rely upon section 17 of the limitation act. therefore, condonation of delay was without jurisdiction and also without sufficient cause and should be set aside. the petition for revocation should be dismissed as barred ..... rajgarhia) probate was obtained by dipak kumar himatsingka without proving the same solemnly and without consent. hence, application was filed under section 263 of indian succession act.under section 263 the probate was liable to be revoked being just cause. in the said section it is provided that such just cause shall be deemed ..... of administration or succession certificate must be made after the deceaseds death. the law on the point can be summarised thus:- (1) under the limitation act no period is advisedly prescribed within an application for probate, letters of administration or succession certificate must be made; (2) the assumption that under art. 137 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2012 (HC)

M/S. Dunlop India Ltd Vs. M/S. E.V. Mathai and Sons

Court : Kolkata

..... of its properties during the pendency of the reference before the bifr, appears to be void - being in derogation of the mandatory provisions of the 1985 act. subject to further consideration, it appears today that any subsequent dealing with any of those properties may be of no effect since the company, without the ..... reference relating to the company was made before the board for industrial and financial reconstruction (bifr) under the provisions of the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985. madura coats contends that the reference relating to the company was not closed because dunlop india limited had picked up its manufacturing activities or had become ..... the trade creditors of the company, madura coats limited, has carried ca no. 34 of 2012 under, inter alia, section 6 450 of the companies act seeking the appointment of the official liquidator as the provisional liquidator over and in respect of company's assets and properties. madura coats has an independent winding- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2011 (HC)

M/S.Outotec Gmbh Pan : Aabco 8228k Vs. Director of Income Tax

Court : Kolkata

..... . let the appeal come up for hearing one week after re-opening at the top. in the meantime, the application for settlement under section 245c of the act filed by the appellant before us will be proceeded with and disposed of by the appropriate authority in accordance with law, but neither the result of such proceeding ..... taking into consideration the aforesaid provisions contained in section 245ha of the act and also taking into consideration the fact that this court will remain closed for more than one month from day after tomorrow, we propose to pass the ..... hand, opposed the aforesaid prayer of dr. pal and has contended that the learned single judge on correct interpretation of the provisions contained in section 245a of the act passed the order impugned and, as such, we should not pass any interim order on this application. after hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 2011 (HC)

Sri Subhabrata Ghosh. Vs. Smt. Mohua Ghosh.

Court : Kolkata

..... the learned additional district judge, 1 st fast track court, howrah in misc. case no.86 of 2005 thereby disposing of an application under section 24 of the hindu marriage act. 2. the husband / petitioner herein instituted a suit being matrimonial suit no.588 of 2005 against the wife / opposite party for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. the ..... counsel for the parties and on going through the materials on record, i find that for the purpose of disposal of the application under section 24 of the hindu marriage act filed by the wife, both the parties have adduced evidence. 5. upon analysis of the evidence on record, the learned trial judge has found that the husband / petitioner herein is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 10 2011 (HC)

West Bengal Electronics Industry Development Corporation Limited Vs. B ...

Court : Kolkata

..... intended to decide the fiscal disputes in cases of major policy matters to save the public money and courts valuable time. so action for eviction under the act of 1971 is maintainable and the estateofficer has rightly rejected such prayer which should not be interfered with in revision. 5. i have carefully considered the rival ..... two public sector undertakings/enterprises.such dispute arose in a proceeding being no. 926 of 2008 under section 4 of the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971 initiated by the respondents against petitioner who was called upon to deliver peaceful and vacant possession of the piece and parcel of land measuring about 27348.50 ..... corporation ltd.is a govt. company.the respondent no.1, board of trustees of the port of calcutta is a body corporate constituted under the major port trust act, 1963.it is a local authority owning land and buildings on both sides of the river hooghly in and near kolkata.therefore, for all practical purposes the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2010 (HC)

Modern Malleables Limited and ors. Vs. Sri B.R. Sinku

Court : Kolkata

..... in the impugned criminal proceedings by the rbi and the release all those gris by the state bank of hyderabad through which the export was negotiated, no violation of the act can be said to have been committed by the petitioners relating to the gris in question and, as such, the impugned proceedings are liable to be quashed.7. mr. dey ..... the revisional application that prior to the institution of the criminal proceeding under section 56 read with section 68 of the fera, the adjudication proceeding under section 50 of the act was started against the accused persons as far back as in august, 1995 pursuant to the issuance of memo no. t-4/20-c-95 (scn) dated 28.8. ..... , then such person has not taken reasonable steps to receive or recover the payment for the goods be presumed to have contravened the provision of section 18(2) of the act.the accused persons having failed to take any action or refrained from taking any action which has the effect of securing the export proceed of us 16,080.96 have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2010 (HC)

National Cooperative Consumers Federation of India Limited Vs. the Ori ...

Court : Kolkata

..... 2006) 11 scc 651 rodemadan india ltd v. international trade expo centre ltd. the view was expressed in the context of the applicability of section 42 of the 1996 act to a petition under section 11 thereof.12. the petitioner also relies on the unreported delhi judgment to say that even in such case the court recognised that disputes between ..... to arbitration if the arbitrator is nominated by the respondent or by its chairman-cum-managing director. the petitioner says that a request under section 11 of the 1996 act is not carried to a court but it is a request that has to be made to a chief justice or his designate. for such purpose the petitioner ..... court of law.' the court emphasised, in chief conservator of forests v. collector, that the '(v)arious departments of the government are its limbs and, therefore, they must act in coordination and not in confrontation.'8. the petitioner attempts to assert that it is not under the control of the central government and, for such purpose, it relies on .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //