Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan Year: 1997 Page 6 of about 138 results (0.241 seconds)

May 14 1997 (HC)

Samsher Singh Gulla Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-14-1997

Reported in : 1998CriLJ435

..... , gandasi was recovered on 28-12-1988 vide ex. p/12 at the instance of the accused appellant after he had made a disclosure statement under 27 of indian evidence act. site plan of the place of recovery of gandasi was also prepared which is (sic) post mortem of dead body of deceased was conducted on 22-12-1988. the articles .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 1997 (HC)

Brimco Bricks and anr. Vs. Sitaram Agarwal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-20-1997

Reported in : AIR1998Raj71; 1997(3)WLC78

..... circumstances, the arbitration proceedings abate? 3. these questions emerge in the following circumstances. (a) during the pendency of petition under section 20 of the arbitration act, 1940 (for short the act 1940) non-petitioner sita ram on april 30, 1994 moved an application before the learned court below under order 22, rule 3, c.p.c. ..... aug. 14, 1993. as per legal representatives were not brought o record by the applicants m/s. brimco bricks and others, therefore petition under section 20 of the act 1940 abated. (b) on may 20, 1994, the legal representation of late smt. chanda devi alongwith partner ofthe firm damodar das, submitted another application requesting the learned ..... the action for filing the revision has been resorted to by the petitioners. 4. the first question for consideration is whether having regard to the provisions of the act 1940 and rules made thereunder, order 22, c.p.c. can at all be applied to arbitration proceedings. 5. an agreement between the parties is the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 1997 (HC)

Kania and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-27-1997

Reported in : 1998CriLJ150

..... established that the assault made on mangu singh was in prosecution of the common object of the unlawful assembly.9. the next important question to be decided whether the act of the accused persons is punishable under section 302 read with section 149 of the indian penal code. the prosecution has adduced evidence to prove that the accused ..... and budharam p.w. 11 are the police constables, who carried the malkhana articles to forensic science laboratory, jaipur. chunnia p.w. 2, misra p.w. 3 and bal want singh p.w. 4 are the witnesses of recovery of certain articles during investigation.8. bhawani singh p.w. 6 and chhatar singh have given statements to the effect ..... , prayed that the appeal be allowed and the appellants be acquitted of both the charges. in the alternative, the learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the act of the accused does not travel beyond the scope of section 325 of the indian penal code, because there is no evidence to prove that all the accused persons .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 1997 (HC)

Ashwani Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-29-1997

Reported in : 1998CriLJ252

..... 26-2-97 and the learned trial judge, while examining and discussing the circumstances, lastly, resulting in death of the deceased, concluded that it was not a deliberate and intentional act on the part of dr. kamal gotra or any other medical officer and, as a result, finding no prima facie case of his involvement, either in the alleged conspiracy or ..... causing death of harish agarwal and, as a result, the accused petitioner who is involved in as many as 22 cases including those of murder, under the arms act. n.d.p.s. act etc. and, therefore, looking to the nature of the offences, besides there being a strong motive to grab an amount of rs. 21,00,000/- to which the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 1997 (HC)

Parvati Construction Co. Vs. Rajasthan Housing Board and 40 ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-29-1997

Reported in : (1998)IILLJ970Raj

..... and stability from which it can reasonably be concluded that the establishment can in the normal way bear the burden of contribution towards the provident fund under the act would not be covered by this definition. the word 'employment' must, therefore, be construed as employment in the regular course of business of the establishment; ..... clearance certificate from the department of p.f. commissioner.'under this clause in the contract, the contractor is required to provide all benefits of provident-fund act to the persons engaged in his establishment on temporary or permanent basis and he is made responsible to keep all the records in relation thereto and further ..... principal employer. in case, the contractor fails to submit the requisite information for deposit of the provident-fund of his employees as per the provisions of the act of 1952 or the scheme, 5% of the gross payment towards the provident fund account shall be kept in the miscellaneous account. if the contractor produces the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1997 (HC)

Maharaja Shri Umaid Mills Limited, Pali and ors. Vs. State of Rajastha ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-02-1997

Reported in : AIR1998Raj9; 1997(3)WLC81; 1998WLC(Raj)UC30

..... person/industrial concern from causing such pollution. the pollution is a health-hazard and the law prohibiting pollution admits pollution as an evil. section 33 of the act is analogous to and pari materia with section 133 of the code of criminal procedure and serve the same problems. both these provisions, though in different legislations ..... a second complaint has already been filed against the petitioners by the complainant, on 10-12-84, for the offences under sections 24, 25 and 26 of the act. the order dated 22-3-86, (sic), thus, passed by the learned chief judicial magistrate restoring the application is, therefore, wholly without jurisdiction. 4. learned ..... in the bandi river. on 11 -5-84, the water pollution board filed an application under section 33 of the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 in the court of the chief judicial magistrate, pali against the petitioners expressing its grave apprehension that by reason of untreated disposal of sewerage and trade .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1997 (HC)

Smt. Saroj Chotiya Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-02-1997

Reported in : AIR1998Raj28; 1997(3)WLC411; 1997(2)WLN46

..... more than two children; provided that.-- xxx xx (e) the birth within three years from the date of the commencement of the rajasthan municipal (amendment) act, 1992 (rajasthan act no. 32 of 1992) hereinafter in this clause referred to as the date of such commencement, of an additional child shall not be taken into consideration for ..... lead to serious social and economic problems throughout the world.'20. after negativating the argument on the validity of section 26(xiv) and proviso (e) of the act, we, now, proceed to consider the question regarding the legality and correctness of the order annexure-4 passed by the deputy secretary, local self government, putting the ..... violative of any of the provisions of the constitution and the right to be elected is a right created under the statute with certain limitations provided under the act and the writ petition filed by the petitioner, therefore, deserves to be dismissed.5. before examining the arguments raised by the learned counsel for the parties .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1997 (HC)

D.C.M. Limited Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-02-1997

Reported in : [1998(79)FLR913]; (1998)ILLJ979Raj; 1997WLC(Raj)UC665; 1997(2)WLN10

..... also in connection with the work of establishment though employed through a contractor, they will be considered to be employee as defined under section 2(f) of the act of 1952. the contention that the notice was issued for the limited purpose for determining the liability of transporter employee alone and not of all the contractors' ..... the contractor was to employ certain employees. the petitioner company has submitted in its reply that two of such contractors were already covered in the purview of the act of 1952 and the employees of those two contractors have been excluded in determining the liability of the petitioner. in respect of rest of them, no such ..... case of mridang cinema v. uoi and ors. 1989 (2) rlr 834 where the employees of independent contractor were considered employees within the definition given under the esi act. the contractor's employees in the present case were for loading and un-loading in respect of transport contract entered into. on the basis of the agreement which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1997 (HC)

Kishnia and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-02-1997

Reported in : 1998CriLJ38

..... 313 of the criminal procedure code. he has, therefore, prayed that this fact should be taken into consideration by the court and appropriate orders be passed under the juvenile justice act. the learned public prosecutor has supported the judgment of the trial court and prayed for dismissal of the appeal.9. we have carefully considered the rival arguments and ..... years old and accused kishnia as according to his statement was 20 years old, and therefore, these accused persons should be given the benefit of the juvenile justice act.24. we do not find any force in the submission made by the learned counsel for the accused. there is nothing to justify the conclusion that accused mania ..... be available to them because the provisions of section 3 apply to enquiry only and have no application to trials and appeals. section 26 of the juvenile justice act, 1986 does not apply to the case of the accused because on the date of the conviction by the learned sessions judge they were not juveniles.25. for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1997 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Chathu Ram

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-02-1997

Reported in : 1998(1)ALT(Cri)21; 1998CriLJ1528; 1998(1)WLC424; 1997(2)WLN1

..... 1 was true or false. the learned sessions judge has not exercised his powers under section 165 of the indian evidence act. it is therefore, not open to him to say that the statement of smt. chothudi p.w. 2, who is otherwise reliable witness can be discarded on the ground ..... the statement of smt. chothudi p.w. 2 was reliable. it was open to the learned sessions judge to have exercised his powers under section 165 of the indian evidence act by putting relevant questions to smt. chothudi p.w. 2, chhaganlal p.w. 5 and suvalal p.w. 6 to ascertain whether the statement made by bhanwari p.w. ..... if so, how it was reconcilable with their own versions. the learned sessions judge did not deem it fit to exercise his powers under section 165 of the indian evidence act for removing the inconsistency pointed by him between the statement of bhanwari p.w. 1 and the other witnesses. obviously, it means that when the witnesses, namely, smt. chothudi p .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //