Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Sorted by: old Court: mumbai aurangabad Page 1 of about 443 results (0.076 seconds)

Sheikh Rashid Son of Sheikh Yakub Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... some time, accused proceeded towards the river. the evidence of p.w.2 khairunbi is also considered by us within the parameters of section 6 of evidence act as discussed hereinabove. having considered the totality of the facts, circumstances and evidence, we are of the view that the accused intentionally and with knowledge poured kerosene ..... to the general rule whereunder the hearsay evidence becomes admissible. it is also observed by the supreme court that such evidence must be almost contemporaneous with the acts and there should not be an interval which would allow fabrication. the statements sought to be admitted, therefore, as forming part of res gestae, must have ..... so. the very inconsistent and improbable statements were made by the witness and, therefore, were hardly reliable. reference was made to section 118 of the evidence act. the observation was that she was a competent witness to give evidence in court, as it appears from her deposition. reference was also made that the said .....

Nandkishor S/O Damodhar Wadgaonkar and Another Vs. Gajanan S/O Uttamra ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... order ix rule 9 of code of civil procedure and also section 141 of code of civil procedure and even the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act, there is no doubt that 4th joint civil judge (senior division), aurangabad has exceeded the jurisdiction and for unsustainable reasons in law condoned the delay. therefore ..... in a judgment has been repeatedly disapproved by this court in a number of cases. whilst considering applications for condonation of delay under section 5 of the limitation act, the courts do not enjoy unlimited and unbridled discretionary powers. all discretionary powers, especially judicial powers, have to be exercised within reasonable bounds, known to the ..... the delay by stray observations i.e. in the interest of justice such delay is required to be condoned, is not only defeating the provisions of limitation act, but amounts to causing injustice to the defendants i.e. revision applicants herein. when the court considers the case in the interest of justice, the trial .....

Shaikh SalimoddIn Shaikh ShamsoddIn Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Thro ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... advanced by learned counsel for the parties, at length. with their able assistance perused the grounds taken in the petition, annexures thereto, provisions of essential commodities act, maha.scheduled commodities regulation and distribution) order, 1975, judgments cited by learned counsel for the parties and also reasons recorded by respondent nos. 2, 3 ..... 28th december, 2010 to 5th january, 2011 and submitted its detailed report showing various illegalities, irregularities, discrepancies and malpractices on the part of the petitioner. acting upon the said report, respondent no.5 issued notice to the petitioner on 2nd june, 2011 and called his explanation in respect of illegalities and malpractice ..... resp.no.6 - society submits that, resp.no.6 is a magas vargiya grahak sahakari sanstha registered under the provisions of the maha.co-operative societies act,1960 and was running three fps nos. 73, 77 and 78 in aurangabad district at different places. in the year 1982, resp.no.6 society went .....

Arun Vs. Varsha and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... specified in clause (i) of sub section (1) of section 13, the petitioner has not in any manner been accessory to or connived at or condoned the act or acts complained of or where the ground of the petition is cruelty the petitioner has not in any manner condoned the cruelty, and (bb) when a divorce is ..... petitioner-husband challenging the order passed by principal judge, family court, aurangabad in petition c-4 of 1996 under sections 18 and 20 of hindu adoption and maintenance act 1956. learned counsel for petitioner-husband has submitted that appeal deserves to be allowed by setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned in charge judge ..... join the company of petitioner-husband. learned counsel further submitted that learned judge of family court has misconstrued and misinterpreted the provisions of section 23 of the said act and thereby arrived at an erroneous conclusion. in fact, the family court ought to have granted decree for divorce on the sole ground that there has been .....

Malu Dhondapa Bule (deceased through his legal heirs) and Others Vs. B ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the order passed by the assistant collector, rahuri, who failed to appreciate the set of facts and dismissed the application under section 84 of the btal act. considerations 9. on scrutiny of the impugned order, passed by the learned member of the maharashtra revenue tribunal, it is noticed that for following reasons ..... the application under section 84, according to the learned senior counsel, was deliberately moved in order to save limitation as contemplated under section 29 of the btal act. (k) further it was the submission of the learned senior counsel that the revision filed before the maharashtra revenue tribunal was barred by limitation. according to ..... original petitioner. petitioners in writ petition no. 3094 of 2001 are legal representatives of yadav mhatarba katore. 3. the application under section 84 of the btal act was in respect of certain lands, situated at mauje sonai, taluka newasa, district ahmednagar. the said application was pertaining to the following lands, situated at .....

Sameer Ahmed Khan Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... by this court in the past. it needs to be presumed that these interim orders and directions were subject to result of the proceeding and the provisions of the act. the petitioner did not come to this court for getting permission for making application to appear for the common entrance test which is held for admission to post ..... ). the facts were different. 15. the procedure prescribed by the apex court in the case of madhuri patil (cited supra) and the procedure laid down in the act and the rules show that strict verification of the caste before giving benefit to a person is necessary so that the benefit is given to the real backward class person ..... to scheduled tribe, raj. in view of this circumstance, the other record which is mentioned above cannot be given much importance. 14. provision of section 6 of the act shows that each and every claim is expected to be verified by the committee independently. this becomes more necessary when there is no validity certificate in favour of the .....

Baburao and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... by the additional sessions judge, hingoli in special child case no.1 of 2013 on 29th april 2015 under section 4 of the protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012 ("the act" in brief) and has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of rs.35,000/- (rupees thirty five thousand) and in ..... new abadi was about a kilometer away from the main village and was having less population (thus giving opportunity to the accused to reach out to the victim for repeated acts of violation); that the accused was in a position to take precaution to conceal his activities; that the evidence of pw-7 uttam was natural where he deposed that ..... remand home and she is facing hardships of the life as she has no support and the amount of compensation deserves to be increased. relying on section 29 of the act it is stated that there is presumption that the accused committed the offence and thus according to the counsel, no interference in the judgment is called for. 9. .....

Manoj Prabhakar Lohar Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Reported in : 2009(3)BCR(Cri)258; 2009ALLMR(CRI)2883; 2010CriLJ205(NOC)

..... the terrorists for ransom or by anti social elements so as to create panic among the people. the objects of the amendment as enunciated in the amendment act, 1993 (act 42 of 1993) can be gathered from the following paragraph used while introducing such amendment." kidnappings by terrorists for ransom, for creating panic amongst the ..... section 364-a in 1993, it would be amply clear that ordinarily the acts of terrorism or the acts of gangsters, wherein the kidnapping or abduction is committed with intention to fulfill demand for ransom are brought within the purview of this new penal ..... recommended a specific provision to deal with this menace. it was necessary to amend the indian penal code to provide for deterrent punishment to persons committing such acts and to make consequential amendments to the code of criminal procedure, 1973."12. on plain reading of the objects and reasons which propelled the amendment of .....

Shivaji S/O Manohar Kale Vs. the Additional Divisional Commissioner an ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... for the respective parties, it would be appropriate to refer to the provisions, relevant for the determination of the present lis : section 14 ( 1 ) of the bombay village panchayat act, 1958 : no person shall be a member of a panchayat continue as such, who -( a ) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx( b ) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx( c ) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx( d ) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(e ) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ..... offices ( other than those mentioned in sub-rule ( 1 ) at the local, district, state or national level.iii) section 3 ( 31 ) of general clauses act : " local authority " shall mean a municipal committee, district board, body of port commissioners or other authority legally entitled to, or entrusted by the government with, ..... term ' office of profit ' should be given wider interpretation and shall be deemed to have been included in section 14 ( i ) of the act of 1958 is accepted, that would tantamount to legislating with regard to the ground of disqualification, which is impermissible. all the judgments relied by the .....

Dada Ghanshyam Pathak Age 45 Years, Vs. the State of MaharashtrA. and ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... was dishonoured and returned unpaid with the endorsement "want of sufficient balance". therefore, respondent no.2 after observing necessary formalities, initiated proceeding against petitioner under section 138 of negotiable instruments act.5. accordingly, respondent no.2 adduced her own evidence as well as adduced evidence of one witness namely rohini to substantiate her contention. respondent no.2 closed her evidence. thereafter ..... and same was presented for encashment purpose which was obviously returned unpaid and thereafter complainant/respondent no.2 has filed complaint in question under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act against the petitioner herein falsely and therefore, it is the contention of the petitioner that the opinion of the hand writing expert is essential before the court and petitioner's .....