Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Sorted by: old Court: kolkata Page 96 of about 2,482 results (1.588 seconds)

Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxe ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008BusLR303(NULL)

..... at the auctions. rule 42 is an independent exemption granted to cover cases of export of tea after processing or blending to which section 5(3) of the 1956 act may not be attracted. rule 42 recognizes the features peculiar to the tea trade namely, that tea purchased at the auctions cannot be exported as such in most cases ..... :81. declaration and evidence for deduction of sale of tea at auction immediately preceding export (1) where a dealer makes a sale to a registered dealer of tea act auction held in kolkata under the auspices of the calcutta tea traders association or at siliguri under the auspices of the siliguri tea actuion committee or on internet under the ..... formulate the principles for determining when a sale or purchase so takes place. he further drew our attention to sub-section (3) of section 5 of the 1956 act and submitted that the said sub-section provides that the last sale or purchase of any goods preceding the sale or purchase occasioning the export of those goods out of .....

Indian Record Manufacturing Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [2008(117)FLR164],(2008)IILLJ575Cal

..... petitioner submits that although section itself does not provide for any application of judicial mind, while computing the interest amount payable by a person under the act, law demands that since the amount is the subject matter of objective satisfaction of the authority concerned, the authority must take into account all the applicable ..... parameters which shall be produced by the person concerned, while computing the interest amount, because section 7(q) of the act creates a legal liability and it is needless to say that legal liability must be ascertained subject to the documents and evidence produced before the authority concerned ..... learned single judges of this court in two different cases dealing with identical matter, i find that both their lordships after examining the provisions of the act and keeping in mind the guiding principle of natural justice, came to the conclusion that fair justice requires that the authority concerned while computing the .....

Sonali Bank Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... whereby the tribunal accepted the contention of the workmen regarding representation of the petitioner through a legal counsel under section 36(4) of the industrial disputes act.2. in a reference dispute before the tribunal the petitioner as management entered appearance through its engaged legal counsel and coming to know about this engagement the ..... writ petition observed that since the workmen did not give their consent to such engagement of legal counsel, under provisions of section 36(4) of the act tribunal cannot allow the petitioner management to be represented by any legal counsel. 3. being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with this order the present writ petition ..... outset the workmen respondent raised an objection and did not give their consent for engagement of legal counsel, following the provision of section 36(4) of the act, tribunal rightly upheld the objection and rejected the prayer of the management to be represented through a legal counsel. 7. i have heard the submissions of .....

R.V. Palega and anr. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN768

Ashim Kumar Roy, J.1. The petitioner moved this application invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this Court for quashing of the Jorabagan Police Station Case No. 126 dated 14/11/2006, under Section 420/120B of the Indian Penal Code and the result of investigation on the grounds as follows:(a) Although both the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 have been described as the partners of a firm M/s. Metco Export International while the petitioner No. 2 is one of the partner but the same is not correct so far as the petitioner No. 1 is concerned.(b) In the complaint although it has been alleged that a sum of Rs. 10,58,939/- was the outstanding but according to the admission of the complainant in his lawyer's notice, at best a sum of Rs. 3,58,939/- is due and payable.(c) There was a dispute going on by and between M/s. Metco Export International and M/s. Sandip Trading Company, the opposite party No. 2 and the same will be reflected from the letter of the petitioner dated March 21, 2005 and the instant...

Joydeep Mukherjee and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors. ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN546

..... station of singur in the district of hooghly started acquisition proceedings and several notifications were issued by the state government under section 4 of the said act. one such copy of the said notification is reproduced hereunder:government of west bengaloffice of the land acquisition collector & district magistrate &collector;, hooghlynotification ..... v. lotus hotels put ltd. : air1983sc848 , in which a statutory corporation arbitrarily refused to grant the sanction of loans to entrepreneurs who had already acted on the basis of the sanction, and had incurred expenditure and liabilities. the argument that the transaction was purely a contractual arrangement between the parties ..... differential treatment meted out to government recognised private law colleges alone. there should be nexus between the basis of classification and the object of the act under consideration. on the above crucial aspects, on an evaluation of government's affidavits, they are found to be wanting, replete as they .....

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Sabita Mondal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(3)CHN226

..... of one year and failing which the proceeding would have lapsed. but before the proceeding could be lapsed in terms of section 7a of the 1996 amending act; the amending act of 1997 came into force from may 2, 1997 and by virtue of section 54a all the proceedings pending were deemed to have been pending under the ..... sub-section (3a) and sub-section (3b) of section 9 mutatis mutandis.9. before analyzing the aforesaid provisions let us take a close look to the act i. under act i the state is entitled to acquire any property upon payment of appropriate compensation. under section 4 the state has to express their intention in a public notice ..... land has, upon the collector taking possession thereof, already vested absolutely in the government, free from encumbrances'.4. amendment of section 11a.- in section 11a of the principal act. after the proviso, the following proviso shall be added:provided further that in respect of the acquisition of the land referred to in sub-section (3a), and sub- .....

Pralay Karmakar and ors. Vs. Uttara Co-operative Housing Society Limit ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2008)1CALLT251(HC)

..... on 28.1.85, it is hopelessly barred by limitation. it has been further contended by mr. bhattacharya that the west bengal co-operative societies act, 1973 being special act prescribing its own limitation and procedures to be followed at the proceeding of such dispute case there is no scope for any extention of limitation or condonatian ..... performance of contract is well within the scope of affairs or business or transaction of the housing co-operative society within the provisions of section 86 of the act of 1973 and learned tribunal ought to have held the dispute case maintainable.17. mr. milan chandra bhattacharya, the learned advocate appearing for the respondent while supporting ..... from the post, as deputy registrar of co-operative societies was of the opinion that the society could not appoint a paid chief executive and a society must act through its secretary. since 1981 the said suresh bhowmick is in litigation with the society. it is the further case of the defendant society that, the .....

Jenson Nicholson (i) Ltd. Vs. Controlling Authority Under the Payment ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2008)2CALLT350(HC),2008(2)CHN954

..... in the case of maharasthra tubes ltd. (supra), a state financial corporation was prevented from exercising their power under section 29 of the state financial corporation act, 1951 under which such corporations are empowered to take over the management and/or possession of an industrial concern if such concern fails to discharge their liability ..... protect the assets of the company in their commercial dealings. but what is directed to be recovered by the controlling authority under the payment of gratuity act is the property of the employees. the authorities cited by the petitioners mostly relate to disputes of recovery of dues of the company arising out of ..... industrial company. the restricted immunity which is sought to be provided for a sick industrial unit under the provisions of section 22(1) of the 1985 act are claims against the company mainly arising out of commercial transactions or contracts. this provision cannot protect such undertaking from a claim of legitimate dues of .....

Banibrata Das Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2008)1CALLT299(HC),2008(3)CHN1016

..... the authorities did not care to consider those two decisions before proceeding as against banibrata.14. under the west bengal schedule caste and schedule tribe identification act state has been empowered through the proper authority to identify the persons belonging to the said caste. rules framed thereunder in 1995 have laid down the ..... subrata mukhopadhyay and ms. basabi roychowdhury have contended that the appellant banibrata did not prefer any appeal from the earlier order of this court. the authorities acted in terms of the order of this court and issued show cause notice to banibrata which ultimately resulted in the reasoned order for cancellation. the authorities gave ..... as to the jurisdiction of the sub-divisional officer nor any challenge was thrown to the provisions of the west bengal schedule caste and schedule tribe identification act, 1994 or the rules framed thereunder in the earlier writ proceedings. hence, such plea could not be sustained. his lordship also negated the plea .....

Sri Uttam Kayal Vs. Sri Sunil Pal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2008)1CALLT354(HC),2008(2)CHN966

..... /petitioner herein for evicting the defendant from the suit property by determination of relationship of landlord and tenant by service of notice under section 106 of the transfer of property act upon the petitioner.5. the plaintiff also prayed for a decree for mense profit @ monthly rent equivalent from the month of october 2005 upto the delivery of the vacant possession ..... . the learned trial judge rejected the defendant's said application by holding that in a suit for eviction under the transfer of property act by service of notice upon the tenant under section 106 of the transfer of property act, there is no scope for depositing rent in court.7. the learned trial judge also held that since such an application was .....