Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Sorted by: old Court: guwahati Page 6 of about 702 results (0.209 seconds)

Assam Small Industries Dev. Corpn. Ltd. and ors. Vs. J.D. Pharmaceutic ...

Court : Guwahati

..... authorities, government organisations and public sector undertakings shall invariably make purchase of all their requirements from the asidc. therefore, the scheme of the act leaves no option with any government department, organisation or subordinate authority to purchase the items enlisted in schedule iii from any manufacturer other ..... authority' means the state government departments and their subordinate authorities. state government undertaking/ corporation/statutory bodies/autonomous bodies.11. from the scheme of the act, as discussed hereinabove, it would appear that the 'requiring authority' is the state government departments and other subordinate authorities etc. they are to ..... further confirms the superior status of the asidc. notwithstanding the agreement made between the corporation and the respondent firm that the former would act as agent of the later, the corporation by issuing requisitions bought the medicines from the respondent firm for stores of the government departments .....

Pritish Ranjan Roy and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... in deployment thereafter when the project is over and the work-charge employee became surplus and was retrenched after being paid compensation under industrial disputes act and the direction of high court to consider such retrenched employee as permanent employee was said to be erroneous, however, in peculiar facts and ..... and ors. in (2004) air scw 4462 that appointment made without notifying if vacancies to employment exchange and in violation to the mandatory provisions of 'act' and rules ignoring minimum qualifications cannot be taken for regularisation despite the issuance of government order giving directions for regularisation. in a. umarani (supra) the ..... held not to be regularized as irregularity could be considered for absorption and not the illegality. according to madhya pradesh industrial employment (standing orders) act regularisation cannot be claimed as a matter of right as the constitutional scheme which the country has adopted does not contemplate any backdoor appointment.97. .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sahadev Ghosh

Court : Guwahati

..... presumed to be complete in view of the registry's order dated 23.2.2005. none appears for the respondent.2. by this application under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963, the applicant has sought for condonation of delay of 176 days in preferring the related mpa no. 115/04.3. in the case in hand, the learned commissioner for .....

Dipak Kumar Chakraborty Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... may be referred to which prescribe forfeiture of seniority and severe reprimand. section 50 speaks of combination of punishments. thus from the above provisions of the bsf act, it cannot be said that the petitioner has been imposed with impermissible punishments leading to double jeopardy.21. from the aforesaid provisions it will also be seen ..... imposed with the sentence as quoted above. thereafter, the petitioner made an appeal before the appellate authority as per the provision of section 117 of the bsf act, 1968. the appeal was disposed of and the same was communicated to the petitioner by annexure 13 communication dated 16.4.2004. as per the said communication ..... .7. being aggrieved by the aforesaid imposition of penalty, the petitioner preferred a petition/appeal as provided under section 117(2) of the b.s.f. act before the director general seeking interference in the matter. however, the appeal preferred by the petitioner was rejected by the director general and the same was communicated .....

Neepco Tribal Employees' Welfare Association, Vs. Union of India (UOi) ...

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : (2007)211CTR(Gau)133,[2007]290ITR481(Gauhati)

..... was discriminatory. consequently, as alluded hereinabove, the words 'who is not in service of the government' were deleted from section 10(26) of the act by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1970, (act 42 of 1970).31. in ito v. n. takin roy rymbai : [1976]103itr82(sc) the respondent who belonged to the jaintia scheduled tribe ..... article 366(25) of the constitution of india for the area, having either their domicile or permanent residence there as specified in section 10(26) of the act, they are not entitled to the exemption granted thereby and therefore, the impugned decision of the revenue authorities is perfectly legal and valid. to buttress his ..... whose case is espoused in the instant proceedings are admittedly members of the schedule tribes, residing in the areas as envisaged in section 10(26) of the act, they are apparently entitled to the exemption thereunder and therefore, the impugned decision to the contrary as manifested in the related communications/notifications is per se, .....

Col. Jagmohan Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Manipur and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... forces. section 5f provides for the manner in which the arrested person is to be dealt with. section 6 provides for the protection to the persons acting under the act. section 4(c) empowers a commissioned officer, warrant officer, non-commissioned officer or any other person of equivalent rank in the armed forces to arrest ..... after having arrested a person except when he is trying to escape, not to interrogate the person arrested by the members of the armed force; to act in closest possible communication with civil authorities; maintain intercommunication if possible by telephone/radio; avoid indiscriminate firing'. considering the above list which is quoted in brief ..... situation which eventually led the union government to constitute a commission to report on the wide-spread demand for withdrawal of the assam forces (special powers) act, 1958. shri mishra argued that the materials collected by the commission would reveal that the deceased was raped and killed in custody. the situation in the .....

Raghu Forwarding Agency and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... charges and the amount claimed by the respondent railways and paid by them under compulsion need to be refunded.5. section 78 of the indian railways act, 1989, (for short the 'act'), reads as under :--78. power to measure, weigh, etc.--notwithstanding anything contained in the railway receipt, the railway administration may, before the delivery of ..... weighment on payment of necessary charges, in view of the principles of promissory estoppel, they are estopped from disputing the re-weighment at ptps weigh bridge and acting on the basis of weighment made at the laskar station and insist payment of punitive charges therefor.9. it was submitted on behalf of the respondents-railways ..... that no rule has been framed by the central government pursuant to the provisions of sub-section 2(g) of section 87 of the act which provides that rules can be made in the matter of -- sub-clause (g); 'the conditions subject to which charges payable for allowing weighment and .....

Raj Kumar Prasad Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... to make the deponent responsible for allegations. in essence verification is required to enable the court to find out as to whether it will be safe to act on such affidavit evidence. in absence of proper verification, affidavits cannot be admitted in evidence. 18. the allegations in the application must be supported by ..... , rule 1 of cpc recognized agents and those holding power of attorney from party authorizing them to make such appearance and filing such application under or do prescribed acts. the law distinguishes recognised, agent from pleader jaymol thokone v. charity commissioners, ahmedabad : air2001guj279 .15. an advocate who is personally interested in a case, ..... /party), is the main question for consideration.6. in order to deal issue it is necessary to indicate section 16(1) of the advocates act, 1961, (in short the 'act 1961') which acknowledges two classes of advocates, i.e., senior advocates and other advocates. section 17(1) provides that every state bar council shall .....

Smt. Khumanthem Ongbi Pangabam Ningol Ibemhal Devi Vs. State of Manipu ...

Court : Guwahati

..... is guaranteed under the constitution, is a claim based on strict liability and is in addition to the claim available in private law for damages for tortuous acts of the public servants. public law proceedings serve a different purpose than the private law proceedings. award of compensation for established infringement of the indefeasible rights ..... law procedures as also public law principles. it may be necessary to identify the situations to which separate proceedings and principles apply and the courts have to act firmly but with certain amount of circumspection and self-restraint, lest proceedings under article 32 or 226 are misused as a disguised substitute for civil action in ..... the applicant and the respondent but also the interests of the public as a whole with a view to ensure that public bodies or officials do not act unlawfully and do perform their public duties properly particularly where the fundamental right of a citizen under article 21 is concerned. law is in the process .....

Escorts Ltd. Vs. International Tractors Ltd. and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... the exercise of contractual power by public authority. that every applicant in a judicial review proceeding in order to succeed has to show that the decision maker has acted illegally, irrationally or in a manner which is procedurally unfair. the central tenet of judicial review, however, is that it is just that review and not appeal ..... be basic in nature and after all objective consideration of different options available taking into account the interest of the state and the public, this court cannot act as an appellate authority by substituting its opinion in respect of selection made for entering into such contract'. these propositions have been stated and restated by the ..... 14 of the constitution of india; the public interest being the paramount consideration.15. however, by way of judicial review the court is not expected to act as a court of appeal while examining the decision to award a contract and to record finding whether such decision could have been taken otherwise in the facts .....