Court : Chennai
Decided on : Mar-29-1989
Reported in : (1990)ILLJ73Mad
..... council functioning in different colleges all over the state. regarding the resolution dated 24th september 1988 is concerned, there could be no ratification of an illegal act. having not initiated the disciplinary matters, the governing council cannot ratify the illegal action of the principal or of what had been done by the ..... before the governing council which was the only authority which could initiate disciplinary proceedings, it would have desired to avoid litigation and prevented the principal from acting with mala fide intentions. he submits that this inter-departmental memo was never relied upon before the learned judge, and it could come into existence ..... other penalties of (i) withholding of promotion (ii) reduction to lower rank, and (iii) dismissal from services, shall be the chairman of the governing council acting on behalf of the governing council. (3) a member may be placed under suspension from service, pending enquiry into grave charges, where such suspension is necessary .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-12-1989
Reported in : (1989)2MLJ295
..... than surprised to see the confidential document which we have extracted above written by the commissioner for land administration, madras directing that patta be issued outside the act as pre-existing ryotwari land. what sort of an enquiry was made, we have already noticed in detail. we only wish that the authorities entrusted ..... coveting an opportunity to make a representation on the question of grant of patta. though this communication had nothing to do with the proceedings under the act actually conducted by the assistant settlement officer at the relevant point of time, yet, the assistant settlement officer did not care to put the third respondent ..... to direct the assistant settlement officer, gudalur to take up the enquiry under the provisions of the gudalur janmam estates (abolition and conversion into ryotwari) act, 1969 (tamil nadu act 24 of 1969) after notice to the present third respondent. the matter was hotly contested and the learned judge in his judgment recorded the following .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Aug-14-1989
Reported in : 1990CriLJ2570
..... two pioneering decisions of the supreme court explaining in so unambiguous and clear-cut-terms the extent of amplitude of the power, besides section 26 of the general clauses act, 1897 ('act, 1897' for short) may be referred to. 56. the first decision is the one reported in : 1960crilj1239 r. p. kanpur v. state of punjab), ..... , dated 23-6-1988 was issued rectifying the said error, namely, correcting '(b)' of sub-section (1) of s. 5 of the prevention of corruption act, 1947 (central act ii of 1947) into '(d)'. (m) since the final report dated 13-6-1988 disclosed offences exclusively tribal by a special judge, learned magistrate submitted the ..... the central government or which involve financial or other interest of the central government or public sector undertaking under the central government or offences under certain central acts with the enforcement of which the central government concerned. it has been stated by the government of india that cases no falling under the above categories, .....
Tag this Judgment!