Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Sorted by: old Court: chennai Year: 1952 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.063 seconds)

Sep 29 1952 (HC)

A.N. Rangaswami and anr. Vs. the Industrial Tribunal, Fort St. George, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-29-1952

Reported in : AIR1953Mad447; (1953)IILLJ24Mad; (1953)IMLJ315

..... giving a reason-able opportunity to the parties affected to represent their cases, under the act the on refers an industrial dispute to a tribunal duly constituted thereunder. invariably, the person appointee to the tribunal is a retired judicial officer.the tribunal ..... character of the forum, the object of the legislature in creating the forum and the nature of the rights decided in that forum. the industrial disputes act, as i have already stated, was enacted for bringing industrial peace as expeditiously as possible. to effectuate that intention, the parliament provided a machinery for ..... , in the poor man's budget, in voluntary unenforceable industrial agreements, in the point of view of trade union and shop committee, and in the acts and orders regulating factories, mines, etc.'similar considerations might have weighed with' the legislature in enacting the aforesaid provision prohibiting a party to be represented by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1952 (HC)

Mylasu Gopalarao Vs. Chitta Seetharamiah and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-07-1952

Reported in : AIR1953Mad582; (1953)IMLJ250

..... stands the decision of the sub-court at, eluru in the present case was a small cause decision which accordingly would be revisable under section 25, provincial small cause courts act and not appealable under section 96, c.p.c.6. the fact that the sub-court at eluru had only original jurisdiction and no small cause jurisdiction at all may ..... be argued before me in this case very properly, because any other point would not be within the purview of my revisional jurisdiction under section 25, provincial small cause courts act. this revision petition is therefore dismissed with costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1952 (HC)

Subbaiah Goundan Vs. Ramasami Goundan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-05-1952

Reported in : AIR1954Mad604

..... chouthmal bhagirath', : air1931pat70 (z) and -- 'chouthmal bhagirath v. jokhiram surajmal', : air1933pat84 (z1): it may be edded that under section 55 of the insolvency act, notwithstanding the adjudication once made relates back to the date of the petition, the transactions which take place between the insolvent and other persons before the date of ..... reason of the subsequent annulment of adjudication. the earlier decisions were followed and the opinion was expressed that it was valid under section 37, provincial insolvency act also. they also applied section 43.27. in ' : air1951mad581 (p)' the matter again came up for consideration before a division bench consisting of ..... chand banerjee v. jagannath marwari' in which their lordships held that where a mortgaged property has vested in the official receiver under the provincial insolvency act of 1907, a mortgagee cannot continue a suit which had been filed prior to the insolvency and which was pending at the time the insolvency commenced .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //