Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: patna Page 5 of about 638 results (0.215 seconds)

Scope Sales Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and Others

Court : Patna

..... planned development of industrial areas including preparation of master plan for promotion of industries and providing other amenities appertaining thereto is vested in section 6 of the act. section 6 (2) also places responsibility upon the authority for planning development and maintenance of industrial areas as well as power for allotment of land, ..... as cancellation provided in section 6(2) of the statute itself. the power of cancellation was exercised by the state under section 9 (3) of the act. the state has also sovereign power to take decision in larger public interest. the individual interest must yield to larger societal interest. there is sovereign right of ..... order contained in annexure-9 came to be passed on 4.4.2009. 8. petitioner wants quashing of this order labeling it to be arbitrary and irrational act especially when the authorities themselves had accepted the offer of the petitioner and the petitioner having fulfilled all the requirements was granted delivery of the land. 9 .....

Seema Devi, W/O Ashok Kumar, Vs. State of Bihar and PravIn Kumar Singh ...

Court : Patna

..... people have mustered so much courage so as to oppose on equal terms the kuar community people of the village. it is alleged that soon thereafter the block pramukh, seema devi, ordered to kill the rathour community people by firing whereupon sudhir kuar opened fire with his whereupon causing bleeding fire arm injury of jitendra singh who fell down and ..... result of which he sustained partial injury and accused vijay singh assaulted madhav singh by means of butt portion of his riffle. it is said that having committed overt acts for about ten minutes the accused persons left and while departing they resorted to firing and also gave out that their purpose had been served. it is alleged that ..... against the remaining others.2. the aforesaid case was registered under section 307 i.p.c. and other allied sections of the penal code and section 27 of arms act to which section 302 i.p.c. was added by order dated 5.8.2006, on the basis of a written report submitted by one pravin kumar singh, impleaded .....

Rajeev Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... the divisional commissioner in terms of section 16(3) of the amended provision and not to the board of revenue in terms of section 32 of the act. such revision applications, even if filed and pending before the board of revenue, would be transferred to respective divisional commissioners but not other revision applications which ..... found in section 30 (appeal) and section 32 (being revision). section 30 and section 32 were general provisions with regard to various orders passed under the act which, as noticed above, primarily deal with matters with regard to adjudication and declaration as well as distribution of agricultural land, which was beyond the ceiling area ..... ordinary) dated 4.5.2006, all revision applications pending before the board of revenue which had been filed in matters arising from section 16(3) of the act under section 32 thereof to be transferred to the divisional commissioners. in other words, all revision applications before the board of revenue in relation to pre-emption .....

Smt. Sudama Devi Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... the taxing statute, the law is well settled that its literal meaning has to be given and there is nothing intendment, presumption on equitable construction in the taxation act. subject should not be allowed to be covered within the net of taxation by applying the construction, not permissible by giving literal meaning to the taxing statute. ..... educational institution in connection with any of its activities. private service vehicle has been defined under section 2(33) of the act which means a motor vehicle constructed or adapted to carry more than six persons excluding the driver and ordinarily used by or on behalf of the owner of ..... any motor vehicle not so constructed or adapted when used for the carriage of goods. educational institution bus has been defined under section 2(11) of the act which means an omnibus, which is owned by a college, school or other educational institution and used solely for the purpose of transporting students or staff of the .....

Bandera Muraul Navyatayat Swablambi Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Vs. State of B ...

Court : Patna

..... as government of india or state government or any government undertaking or a local authority or a boatmen cooperative society registered under bihar and orissa cooperative societies act 1935, the same can be resorted only if there is only one amongst them eligible for such settlement. the applicability of proviso in context of not ..... or any provisions of law was produced on behalf of the petitioners society to state that a cooperative society getting registration under the bihar self supporting cooperative societies act, 1996 is also entitled to have preferential right for settlement in terms of rule 11c of the rules.20. learned counsel, however, referring to the provisions ..... . admittedly the petitioner society is not registered under bihar and orissa co-operative society and its such registration is only under self supporting co-operative societies act 1996 and as such it cannot claim the right of preferential of settlement of the ghats in question as has been held by this court in case .....

Jagtaran Sariya Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... certificate of election issued in form 22 under rule 66 of the conduct of election rules, 1961, under the representation of peoples act, 1951, granted to the petitioner on discovering that ballot papers of one booth had not been counted. a declaration in form 21c was then prepared declaring the 4th ..... followed by the declaration certificate in form 22 under rule 82. the latter action can be questioned only in an election petition in view of the provisions of the act as noticed above. 8. in the case of krishna ballabh prasad singh v. sdo hilsa cum returning officer : air1985sc1746 , the returning officer cancelled the declaration ..... the only remedy available to respondent no. 5 was to file an election petition under section 137 read with 138(b) of the bihar panchayat raj act (hereinafter called 'the act') in view of the provisions of sections 139(1)(d)(iii) which deals with improper reception, refusal, rejection of any votes or reception of any .....

Nageshwar Choudhary Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... members of the party had rushed to the place and had caught both the hands of the appellant. he also deposed about the preparation of the sezure-list and the act of assault by the mob on the raiding party and arrest of some persons.7. p.w. 5 chandra bhushan singh who was also a watcher in the department had ..... (arising out of vigilance p.s. case no. 29 of 1992) whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted under sections 7 and 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act and section 201 of the indian penal code and respectively sentenced to r.i. for 1 year and a fine of rs. 250/-, r.i. for 2 years and a .....

Nirmal Kumar Pal and ors. Vs. the Joint Director of Consolidation and ...

Court : Patna

..... (5) may within 30 days of such order, file an appeal before the assistant director of consolidation, whose decision, except as otherwise provided by or under this act, shall be final.(7) the consolidation officer shall and the assistant director of consolidation may, where necessary, before deciding an objection or an appeal, make local inspection ..... was no appeal or revision about which there appears to be no controversy.4. the bihar consolidation of holdings and prevention of fragmentation act, 1956 (bihar act xxii of 1956), (for short 'the act'), which received the assent of the president on 6th february, 1956, is designed to provide for the consolidation of holdings and prevention ..... . 5 initiated a fresh innings, later, in 1982 by filing consolidation case no. 299 of 1982 under sub-section (2) of section 10 of the act, initially, contending that the compromise is not binding as he was not present and there were misrepresentation of facts while recording the order of compromise by the .....

Sanjay Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... .i.r. to show that any damage and destruction was caused to the electric pole. thus, apparently, no ingredient of section 3 of the prevention of damage of public property act, 1984 is attracted in this case.9. thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the law, it is quite clear that the prosecution ..... sub-section (2), shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and with fine. 6. mischief has been defined in section 2 of the act says that mischief shall have same meaning as in section 425 of the i.p.c. section 425 i.p.c. runs as follows:425. mischief.- whoever with intent to ..... 13.6.2005 passed by c.j.m., patna in kotwali p.s. case no. 436 of 2002 thereby cognizance under section 3 of prevention of damage of public property act, 1984 has been taken against this petitioner and others.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the state.3. it appears from .....

Md. Imran Son of Peer Gulam, Proprietor of Imran and Co. Vs. the State ...

Court : Patna

Reported in : II(2010)BC243,2010(58)BLJR362

..... of kanpur (up) and only the complainant issued notice from patna which was served to the petitioner in kanpur (up). apart from issuance of notice, all other acts were done at kanpur. in black's dictionary, there is a distinction between giving of notice from receiving of notice. 'a person notifies or gives notice to another ..... complaint was filed on 04.03.1993 before the judicial magistrate, 1st class, adoor in the district of pathanamthitta in kerala against the accused under section 138 of the act. the cheques were issued at pathanamthitta (kerala) whereas it was presented before the syndicate bank branch at kayamkullam (kerala) on the basis of the aforesaid fact, the ..... the code of criminal procedure would apply except when provided otherwise.13. the supreme court in a case where the accused has been convicted under the provisions of the act in the case of k. bhaskaran v. sankaran vaidhyan balan and ors. reported in : 1999 (7) scc 510 has discussed in details the circumstances under which .....