Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: jharkhand Year: 2016 Page 8 of about 241 results (0.073 seconds)

Oct 18 2016 (HC)

Dineshwar Prasad Yadav and Ors Vs. Forest

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Oct-18-2016

..... the respondent perpetuates unfair labour practice as defined under section 2(ra) of the id act, which is not permissible in view of sections 25-t and 25-u of the id act read with entry at serial no.10 in the vth schedule to the id act regarding unfair labour practices. ............................ 6 9. in view of the discussions made hereinabove and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2016 (HC)

Mosrat Ziya Tara Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through the Secretary Law ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-25-2016

..... a decision in a.p. public service commission vs. koneti venkateswarulu & ors. reported in (2005) 7 scc 177, mr. rajendra krishna, the learned counsel for the appellant contended that jpsc acted illegally in the matter and accepted the application form of respondent no. 5 which suffers from misrepresentation and contains a false declaration by the candidate. per contra, mr. anil kumar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2016 (HC)

Jamuna Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-16-2016

..... require serious consideration as to whether the services of an employee against whom such allegations have been raised should be retained in the service of the bank. since a bank acts in a fiduciary capacity in regard to people s investments, the very legitimacy of the banking system depends on the complete integrity of its employees. as indicated hereinbefore, there is ..... the nature of misconduct. these 7 l.p.a. no.342 of 2011 types of rules been enacted by the state keeping in mind the provisions of the hindu marriage act as well as the indian penal code and to avoid subsequent chaos for the distribution of retiral dues, etc and to avoid further multifariousness of the litigations. (xi) it has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2016 (HC)

Nandlal Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-26-2016

..... aforesaid rule could not have .3. been awarded to the petitioner. learned counsel further submitted that on perusal of the office note, which has been obtained under right to information act, it is crystal clear that punishment no.3 has not been mentioned in the note sheet and the same has been subsequently added.5. per contra, learned counsel for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2016 (HC)

Arvind Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-23-2016

..... no. 37/1998 on the basis of criminal case, tatanagar grps case no. 32/97, under sections 307/302/379 of the indian penal code and 25 of the arms act and also prayed for quashing order of appellate authority-d.i.g of rail police, jharkhand dated 12.10.2009 and further prayed for reinstatement of the petitioner in services ..... vide tatanagar g.r.p.s case no. 32/97 under 2 sections 302/307/379 of the indian penal code and under section 25 and 27 of the arms act. it has been submitted that while the petitioner was in the jail custody, basing on the same and similar charge, a departmental proceeding no. 37/98 was initiated, in which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2016 (HC)

Central Coalfields Limited Through Its General Manager Cum Project of ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-05-2016

..... a question of maintainability of the writ petition on the ground of availability of the alternative remedy under section 60 of the bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914. it has been contended that under the statutory provision, the appellant is required to deposit 40% of the certificate demand and the petitioner is ..... by the certificate officer, if aggrieved. the petitioner company made an application to file review petition under section 63 of the orissa and bihar public demand recovery act, 1914 against the order dated 20.02.2013 before the certificate officer, mines circle, dhanbad on 30.04.2013 asking one month time to file review petition ..... no final determination of the certificate amount by the certificate officer and therefore, the petitioner can maintain the writ petition avoiding the statutory provision under section 60 of the act. 3. relying on the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in whirlpool corpn. vs. registrar of trade marks , (1998) 8 scc 1, the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 2016 (HC)

Sagar Pingua Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-12-2016

..... on the dead body, supports the ocular evidence disclosed by eye-witness. it is true that specific allegation has been levelled against some of the accused including the appellants. overt act committed by appellants and other accused has been specified by informant and her son and also by other eye-witness. there appears certain contradiction in their statement, therefore, question arose ..... . available to them. in such circumstances, conviction of the appellants with the aid of section 34 is quite proper because premeditation of mind can well be gathered from the overt act committed and that can be assessed from the fact that the appellants with their associates appeared at the scene of occurrence armed with bhujali. they were having common intention which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2016 (HC)

Poli Mandlain Alias Poli Mandal and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-15-2016

..... the factual position remains that the complaint as it stands lacks ingredients constituting the offence under section 498-a ipc and sections 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act against the appellants who are the sister and brother of the complainant s husband and their involvement in the whole incident appears only by way of a casual ..... under section 482 crpc wherein it was also alleged that no prima facie case was made out against the appellants for initiating the proceedings under the dowry prohibition act and other provisions of ipc. the high court has failed to exercise its jurisdiction insofar as the consideration of the case of the appellants is concerned, who ..... whereby and whereunder cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable under sections 498a/34 of the indian penal code and sections 3/ 4 of the dowry prohibition act.3. the prosecution story as would appear from the complaint petition filed by the opposite party no. 2 is to the effect that the marriage of the complainant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2016 (HC)

Dr Sumit Kumar Alias Sumit Mandal Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-15-2016

..... the factual position remains that the complaint as it stands lacks ingredients constituting the offence under section 498-a ipc and sections 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act against the appellants who are the sister and brother of the complainant s husband and their involvement in the whole incident appears only by way of a casual ..... under section 482 crpc wherein it was also alleged that no prima facie case was made out against the appellants for initiating the proceedings under the dowry prohibition act and other provisions of ipc. the high court has failed to exercise its jurisdiction insofar as the consideration of the case of the appellants is concerned, who ..... whereby and whereunder cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable under sections 498a/34 of the indian penal code and sections 3/ 4 of the dowry prohibition act.3. the prosecution story as would appear from the complaint petition filed by the opposite party no. 2 is to the effect that the marriage of the complainant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2016 (HC)

Manoj Kumar Dubey Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-20-2016

..... of the aforesaid allegation harla p. s. case no. 40 of 2000 was registered under sections 307, 326/34 of the indian penal code and section 27 of the arms act. after investigation charge-sheet was submitted by the police and after cognizance was taken the case was committed to the court of sessions where charge was framed under section 307 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //