Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: jharkhand Year: 2008 Page 9 of about 190 results (0.084 seconds)

May 15 2008 (HC)

Kapildeo Prasad Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-15-2008

Reported in : [2008(3)JCR55(Jhr)]

..... of 'teacher'. their lordships observed that the director research being directly associated or connected with the research programmes of the university, is expected to act and coordinate curricula and the research and extension education. he is enjoined with the duties to perform and coordinate research being done by students and ..... or conducting and guiding research or extension education and includes persons who may be declared by the statute to be teachers.'10. section 19 of the act enumerates officers of the university and provides that the following shall be officers of the university, namely:(i) chancellor:(ii) vice chancellor;(iii) registrar;(iv ..... for the petitioner, has advanced the following grounds in support of the contention of the petitioner.(a) birsa agriculture university has adopted the bihar agriculture universities act, 1987. section 2(xxviii) defines 'teacher' and provides that 'teacher' means a person appointed or recognized by a university for the purpose of imparting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 2008 (HC)

Suryadeo Prasad Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-27-2008

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR667(Jhr)]

..... not have kept the matter relating to promotion of the petitioner in a sealed cover due to subsequent initiation of the departmental proceeding but the authority by doing so, has acted illegally and against the law settled by the hon'ble supreme court in a case of delhi jal board v. mahinder singh as reported in : air2000sc2767 . moreover, now the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2008 (HC)

Jagdish Gope Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-13-2008

Reported in : [2008(3)JCR181(Jhr)]

1. Sole appellant Jagdish Gope stands convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to serve rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-V, Hazaribagh in Sessions Trial No. 384 of 2002.2. Brief facts leading to this appeal are that informant Sunita Devi, wife of the appellant, was married with him nearly four years back. However, he used to ill-treat her and further assault her after taking wine. According to the informant, about eights months before this occurrence, she has been left at the house of the deceased (her father) by the appellant as she was in the family way where she delivered a son. On 10th of May 2002, the appellant came to his in-laws house and requested the deceased to send back the informant along with the child with him. However, the deceased did not accept his request and asked him to come with his father so that the informant and the children could...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2008 (HC)

Smt. Renu Rani Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-11-2008

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR466(Jhr)]

..... .p. no. 2.3. in this context, the o.p. no. 2 has already lodged complaint case no. c/1-1187 of 2002 under section 138 of the n.i. act, which is subject-matter of another miscellaneous petition no. 513 of 2007.4. the learned trial court after considering the materials on record found and held that the offences alleged ..... the charge-regarding section 468 of the ipc has been discussed and keeping in view that earlier complaint case no. c/1-1187 of 2002 under section 138, n.i. act was lodged by the o.p. no. 2 against the petitioner-complainant, the trial court did not believe the story of forging of the cheque as valid grounds.8. we .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2008 (HC)

Rajendra Pandit Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-11-2008

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR751(Jhr)]

M. Karpaga Vinayagam, C.J.1. This writ petition has been filed in the form of Public Interest Litigation, seeking for issuance of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to stop the construction of the Check Dam in the village-Barkikumharia in the block of Bengabad, since the land over which the Check Dam is being constructed is forest land and since the respondent No. 2 had passed an order on 23.3.2007 for cancellation of the construction of the aforesaid Check Dam.2. The petitioner, claiming himself to be a resident of Block-Bengabad, District-Giridih, a social worker and also the Chairman of Jharkhand State Backward Classes' Association, has approached this Court with the prayer that since the land over which the Check Dam is being constructed is forest land, the construction of the Check Dam has to be stopped. He has further stated that he had presented a representation to the respondent No. 2 raising objections, on the basis of which, the respondent No. 2, by the letter dated 23....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2008 (HC)

Shanti Devi Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-08-2008

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR380(Jhr)]

ORDERR.K. Merathia, J.1. Heard the parties finally. In this writ petition, petitioner prayed for a direction upon the respondents to reimburse the medical expenses incurred in the treatment of her deceased husband.2. On 15.2.2007, the following order was passed in this case:Mr. Manoj Tandon, appearing for the Bihar State Electricity Board (for short 'B.S.E.B.') submits that as per the agreement dated 27.12.2003, both the successor Electricity Boards are required to pay the retiral benefits to the employees who have retired from their present territorial jurisdiction of the successor State Electricity Board irrespective of their date of retirement. It is further submitted that as per the said agreement. Jharkhand State Electricity Board (for short 'J.S.E.B.') is liable to pay the medical reimbursement bill of the petitioner's husband who died on 12.9.1998 while working within the territory, now falling within J.S.E.B. He further submits that accordingly pension and all retiral benefits ...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2008 (HC)

Sanjay Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-06-2008

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR655(Jhr)]

ORDERN.N. Tiwari, J.1. In both the writ petitions, common question arises out of the same factual foundation. They have been heard together with the consent of the parties and are being disposed of by this common order.2. In both the writ petitions, the petitioners have prayed for a direction on the respondents to appoint them on the posts of Junior Engineer in any of the departments.namely, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, Road Construction Department or Water Resources Department on the basis of their selection and final recommendation by Jharkhand Public Service Commission (J.P.S.C. for short) in Junior Engineer (Civil) Examination, 2005-06. They have also prayed for quashing the notifications issued by the respondents-Road Construction Department, Water Resources Department as also Drinking Water and Sanitation Department dated 22.7.2007, 18.8.2007 and 2.9.2007 respectively in the daily newspaper 'Prabhat Khabar' and for issuance of appropriate and suitable directions comm...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2008 (HC)

Ram Charitra Choudhary Vs. Madhu Koda and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-21-2008

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR741(Jhr)]

..... of the petitioner is that for the purpose of implementation of various development projects within the district of garhwa, a district rural development agency (drda) registered under the societies registration act was established as a nodal agency. there is a post of assistant planning officer in the aforesaid agency which is presently occupied by a mobile veterinary doctor (respondent no. 7 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2008 (HC)

Bar Association Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-06-2008

Reported in : [2008(3)JCR1(Jhr)]

ORDER1. This PIL relates to opening of National Law School in the capital city (Ranchi) of State of Jharkhand. The initiative for opening of five years degree course Law School has been taken in 2006 and the Birla Institute of Technology (in short 'BIT') Mesra, Ranchi was requested to provide land and building, so that without waiting any further, session for five years degree course could be started. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was also executed by and between the authority of the BIT and the Government and three men core committee was also constituted by the Government of Jharkdiand vide notification dated 10.4.2006.2. A copy of the said memorandum has been annexed as Annexure-A to the counter affidavit filed by the BIT.3 From perusal of the counter affidavit filed by the respondent BIT Mesra, it is evident that the Institute agreed to give full cooperation by allotting land, building and other infrastructure for opening of the National Law School, but unfortunately, the St...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2008 (HC)

Fulmani Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-20-2008

Reported in : [2009(1)JCR126(Jhr)]

R.R. Prasad, J.1. This writ application is directed against the order as contained in pension payment order issued by the Accountant General vide memo No. Pen III-07-08-3980 dated 16.6.2007 (Annexure 1) whereby Rs. 3,60,954/- has been shown as Government dues and has been ordered tobe debited from the amount of pension. Further order as contained in memo No. 4231 dated 19.7.2007 issued by Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi has also been sought tobe quashed whereunder Senior Superintendent of Police directed the Treasury Officer, Ranchi to adjust Rs. 3,60,954/- from the amount of pension and gratuity of the petitioner.2. It is admitted case of the partes that the petitioner was appointed against the post of Sweeper in the year 1964 but at the time of her appointment, her date of birth was not noted in the service book. However, when in the year 1994-95 the above defect was detected, the petitioner was sent to Civil Surgeon, Ranchi for assessment of her age. On examination, age of t...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //