Court : Delhi
..... , is uncalled for and illegal. second, that the committee constituted pursuant to the resolution dated 21.11.2013 is not in accordance with the provisions of the delhi school education act, 1973 and the rules framed thereunder.6. mr ralli, learned counsel for the petitioner, has strenuously argued that the respondents herein despite a reply filed by the petitioner to the ..... his reply to the show cause notice on 23.09.2013.8. with regard to the second aspect referred to hereinabove, mr ralli says that section 15 of the aforesaid act makes it clear that for unaided minority schools the mechanism of a disciplinary proceeding has to be provided in the contract executed between the petitioner and the concerned school. it .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... crl.a. no.763/2000 page 9 of 15 death.16. to constitute an offence under section 304b ipc of dowry death, the presumption under section 113b of the evidence act cannot be raised against an accused until independently the offence under section 498a ipc is proved by leading evidence to the specific allegation with regard to time and date of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... assessed.17. in above view, the suit is partly decreed with costs. the defendants, their companies, their directors, partners, proprietors, officers, servants, agents, associates and representatives or any other person acting for on their behalf are restrained permanently from:-"cs (os) 576/2014 page 7 of 8 (i.) using, selling, offering for sale, marketing, trading, directly or indirectly dealing in or ..... the plaint, the first plaintiff is a company established and incorporated under the laws of england, the second plaintiff being its subsidiary and a company incorporated under the indian companies act, the former marketing and selling its products in india through the latter.3. the plaint described the first defendant as a private limited company incorporated in india, engaged in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... has been held guilty for the offence punishable under section 498a ipc; that the trial court erred in not giving the benefit of section 4 of the probation of offenders act to the appellant as even in an offence under section 304 ipc, the hon ble supreme court in 2000 i ad (criminal) sc631was pleased to give the benefit of probation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... is wholly redundant and could not test.cas. 61/2015 page 7 of 8 have been intended to be covered by the statutory provision, namely, section 291 of the act. 14. keeping in view the aforesaid mandate of law and the fact that the petitioner is the sole beneficiary under the will, the petitioner is granted exemption from executing ..... administration of an estate, which is bequeathed to him and to which there are no other claimants. it is only on account of statutory bar under section 222 of the act, the said sole beneficiary and natural heir not being an executor, is not being granted the probate. it is not in dispute that had he been appointed the executor, ..... . h august, 2017 coram: hon'ble mr. justice manmohan judgment manmohan, j (oral):1. present petition has been filed by the petitioner under section 276 of the indian succession act for grant of probate in respect of will dated 3rd april, 2013 of the deceased ms.promila karnani.2. it has been averred in the petition that the petitioner is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... partly decreed with costs. the defendants, their companies, their directors, partners, proprietors, cs (os) 576/2014 page 7 of 8 officers, servants, agents, associates and representatives or any other person acting for on their behalf are restrained permanently from:-"(i.) using, selling, offering for sale, marketing, trading, directly or indirectly dealing in or advertising on their websites www.digaaz.com or ..... the plaint, the first plaintiff is a company established and incorporated under the laws of england, the second plaintiff being its subsidiary and a company incorporated under the indian companies act, the former marketing and selling its products in india through the latter.3. the plaint described the first defendant as a private limited company incorporated in india, engaged in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the effect that an alternative remedy by way of petition under section 17 of the securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest, 2002 (in short the act ) is available to the petitioner.5. the petitioner s main grievance is that the asset/ property, over which respondent no.1 claims interest is not the asset/ property of private ..... i.e., respondent no.2, 4 and 5 (as per the amended memo of parties).6. it appears that respondent no.1 has taken recourse to section 14 of the act on the premise that the subject asset/ property secured with it was owned by respondent no.2, 4 and 5. 6.1 the impugned order has also been passed based .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... exceptions. o.m.p.(misc.)(comm.) 151/2018 2. this is a joint petition preferred by the parties under section 29a(4) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 1996 act ) for extension of time to conclude the arbitral proceedings.3. as per the averments made in the petition, mr. padam kant saxena, (retired) adj was appointed as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... : hon'ble mr. justice rajiv shakdher rajiv shakdher, j.(oral) 1 this is a petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator under section 11 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (in short 1996 act ). 2 notice in this petition was issued on 20.11.2017. after several attempts, it appears that the respondent has been served. despite service, there was no appearance ..... the supreme court, is appointed as an arbitrator in the matter. the learned arbitrator will be paid fees as per the provisions of the fourth schedule appended to the 1996 act. 10.1 the petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.11. the registry will dispatch a copy of this order to the learned arb. p. no.734 of 2017 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... . vipin chaudhary, advs. coram: hon'ble mr. justice rajiv shakdher rajiv shakdher, j.: (oral) 1 this is a petition filed under section 11 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (in short 1996 act ). the petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator as despite a notice being issued to the respondents, the respondents have not appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arising ..... , andhra pradesh high court (mobile no.9419000938) is appointed as an arbitrator in the matter. learned arbitrator will be paid fees as per the fourth schedule appended to the 1996 act.12. in view of the fact that the respondents took two dates to file a reply and today, via mr. singh conveyed that they did not wish to file a .....
Tag this Judgment!