Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 6 enrolment Court: chennai Page 3 of about 7,547 results (0.851 seconds)

Apr 09 2013 (HC)

K.Palaniswamy Vs. Commandant of T.N.Special Police Iv Battalion

Court : Chennai

..... term 'desertion' read as follows : deserter: one who deserts, one who quits a service without permission.[s.41(1)(f), cr.p.c.] desertion: in general, the act by which a person abandons and forsakes, without justification but a station or condition of public or social life, renouncing its responsibilities and to evading its duties. in krushnakant b ..... has held as follows:it has been held that: "... ... we are of the view that the punishment of dismissal/removal from service can be awarded only for acts of grave nature or as cumulative effect of continued misconduct proving incorrigibility or complete unfitness for police service. merely one incident f absence and that too because of bad ..... appeal no.1608 of 2011 by judgment, dated 26.02.2013, referring the earlier decision, on a similar set of facts, this court (mr.r.k.agrawal, acting chief justice and mr.n.paul vasanthakumar, j) allowed the writ petition in favour of the petitioner who was dismissed from service under rule 3(b) of tamil nadu .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 2013 (HC)

R.Ramamoorthy Vs. the District Collector

Court : Chennai

..... perused the materials available on record.7. before adverting to the above said contentions, this court deems it fit to extract section 20 of the tamil nadu highways act, 2001. ".20. (1) any person aggrieved by the decision of the collector, or the officer to whom the case was transferred, determining the amount may, ..... chennai 1, first respondent, to refer the matter to a court of law, having competent jurisdiction, in accordance with section 20(1) of the tamil nadu highways act and that therefore, the the district collector, land acquisition officer (highways), collectorate of chennai, chennai-1, first respondent, ought not to have declined to refer the matter ..... (highways), inner ring road (southern sector), mambalam-guindy taluk, chennai, second respondent herein, to refer the matter under section 20(1) of the tamil nadu highways act, 2001. the first petitioner claimed compensation of rs.3,000/- per sq.ft..4. in response to the request stated supra, the district collector of chennai has .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 2001 (TRI)

Tamil Nadu Minerals Ltd. Vs. the Jt. Commr. of I.T., Spl.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Reported in : (2006)281ITR101(Chennai)

..... meal centres before the chief minister's birthday, besides the hon'ble chief minister had ordered to take up the question of exemption of this expenditure under the income-tax act to those who made the contribution. there is absolutely no business nexus with these expenses. as such, it cannot be allowed under section 37(1).10. the next issue ..... on of the assessee's business or which results any benefits to the assessee's business has to be regarded as an allowable deduction under section 37(1) of the act. it is, therefore, important to see that whether the contribution was made towards the welfare fund or directly connected or related with the carrying on of the assessee' ..... minister birth day on 24.2.1992. further, the hon'ble chief minister has ordered to take up the question of exception of this expenditure under the income-tax act in those who made the contribution. i knew very well that you have more anxiety and tamin is leading in this cause than other public sector undertakings. i also .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 2005 (TRI)

Tamil Nadu Minerals Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Reported in : (2006)100TTJ(Chennai)738

..... renovate noon-meal centres before the chief minister's birthday, besides the hon'ble chief minister had ordered to take up the question of exemption of this expenditure under the it act to those who made the contribution. there is absolutely no business nexus with these expenses. as such, it cannot be allowed under section 37(1).10. the next ..... the assessee's business of which results in any benefit to the assessee's business has to be regarded as an allowable deduction under section 37(1) of the act. it is, therefore, important to see that whether the contribution was made towards the welfare fund or directly connected or related with the carrying on of the assessee ..... ble chief minister's birthday on 24th feb., 1992. further, the hon'ble chief minister has ordered to take up the question of exemption of this expenditure under the it act to those who made the contribution. , i know very well that you have more anxiety and tamin is leading in this cause than other public sector undertakings. 1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1990 (HC)

M. Palani Vs. the Executive Engineer, Anti Power theft Squad, Tamil Na ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1990)2MLJ124

..... should not be visited with an order of dismissal. for this, reliance was placed on standing order 20(c). standing order 19(xxii) reads as follows:19. acts and omissions constituting misconduct....(xxii) act/acts resulting in conviction in any court of law for any criminal offence involving moral turpitude.standing order 20(c) reads as follows:20. punishment for misconduct....(c) if .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2003 (HC)

The Special Officer, Dharmapuri District Co. Op. Sugar Mills Vs. T.N. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ407Mad; (2003)3MLJ503

..... making him permanent, are questions which have to be resolved by raising a dispute before the appropriate forum. 9. section 2(k) of the industrial disputes act recites as under:-'industrial dispute' means any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between employers and workmen, or between workmen and workmen, which is ..... promotion and other benefits. therefore, the availability of the rights and benefits for which the plaintiffs make a claim be said to be flowing only under the industrial disputes act and therefore, the civil court's jurisdiction has to be ousted impliedly.'12. in rajasthan state road transport corp. & anr. etc. v. krishna kant etc. : ..... herein as also the suits and proceedings to be instituted hereinafter.' 13. a dispute which can be agitated only in a forum created under the industrial disputes act, cannot be adjudicated for resolving such grievance before civil court, which will have no jurisdiction to entertain a suit. the position as on date is an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 2012 (HC)

Union of India Vs. N.Lavanya

Court : Chennai

..... 05.2003. however, we are not in agreement with the contra view taken by the central administrative tribunal, chennai that even though the respondents (petitioners) have acted in accordance with the rules and statutory instructions, considering the fact that the delay has occurred for want of vacancies within the ceiling of 5% for compassionate ground ..... 2007 stating that she should file an appeal to the chief commissioner of the central excise, chennai, who being the appellate authority, under the right to information act, 2005. therefore, an appeal dated 10.07.2007 has been made to the chief commissioner of central excise, chennai and in reply to that the chief ..... not possible to be offered, his/her case will be finally closed and will not be considered etc. and also opined that even though the respondents have acted in accordance with the rules and statutory instructions, considering the fact that the delay has occurred for want of vacancies within the ceiling of 5% for compassionate .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2013 (HC)

The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Rajendran

Court : Chennai

..... , billars gate opposite anna stadium, palmore road, nagercoil - 629 001. .. appellant vs 1.rajendran 2.thankam 3.rani .. respondents civil miscellaneous appeal filed under section 173 of the motor vehicle act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 27.12.2010, passed in m.c.o.p.no.14 of 2010, on the file of the motor accident claims tribunal, ii .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 2016 (HC)

John Vincent Versu Nancy

Court : Chennai

..... the commencement of the indian divorce (amendment) act, 2001, may, on a petition presented to the district court either by the husband or the wife, be dissolved on the ground that since the solemnization ..... clearly amount to cruelty, mental agony and harassment meted out to the appellant. 12. since the parties are professing christian religion, section 10 of the divorce act, 1869, governing the grounds for dissolution of marriage, reads as follows:- 10. grounds for dissolution of marriage.--(1) any marriage solemnized, whether before or after ..... the respondent used to quarrel and torture the appellant by entertaining suspicion due to inferiority complex. even if there was a small wordy quarrel, she would act like a hysterical patient, thereby putting the appellant to mental agony and unnecessary hardship directly impacting on his official duties. again when there was a second .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2016 (HC)

Branch Manager, I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Company, Mumbai V ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... to the estate of the deceased. there is a specific inclusion of all legal representatives to claim for compensation under section 166 of the motor vehicle's act. therefore, merely because a married daughter has joined the other claimants/legal representatives, or makes a separate claim, such claim cannot be said to be against ..... , and the same is extracted hereunder:- "there is another, aspect, which requires consideration. the provisions of sections 110-a to 110-f of the motor vehicles act, were inserted to provide cheap and speedy remedy to the persons, who had suffered loss on account of the accident. the provisions, being benevolent, call for liberal ..... in gujarat state road transport corporation v. ramanbhai prabhatbhai reported in 1987 acj 561 (sc), the allahabad high court held that the emphasis under the motor vehicles act is dependency and that near and dear, including the brother's children can be the dependants. (d) in oriental insurance company ltd., v. naresh chandra agarwal .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //