Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 55 punishments otherwise than by force court Court: rajasthan Page 4 of about 37 results (0.130 seconds)

Pala Ram and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj302

..... took the poison herself and committed suicide on account of harassment and beating by her in-laws, which can be termed as an abetment to commit suicide. this act is punishable under sections 306 and 498a ipc as against appellant pala ram.12. so far as accused appellant mst. kalawatl is concerned, though the offence under section ..... back to the trial court by issuing notice to rebut the presumption, which is a necessary constituent of offence under section 304b ipc read with section 113b, evidence act. while discussing the scope of section 304b ipc as well as section 306 ipc, the supreme court in para 30 observed as follows:30. but the peculiar situation ..... be gathered from her statement is that on account of harassment for dowry and beating by her husband pala ram, deceased sharda took poison and committed suicide. this act of the accused by harassing her amounts to cruelty within the definition of section 498a ipc for which accused pala ram can be held liable only under sections 306 .....

Narendra Kumar Kamboj Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2007(3)WLN452

..... of haryana v. om prakash and anr. (1968) 8 scc 733, the hon'ble apex court explained the distinction between 'retrenchment' and 'abandonment' from service, observing that termination contemplates an act on the part of the employer which puts an end to service to fall within the definition of the expression 'retrenchment' and in case the workman does not report for .....

Tej Singh Vs. Bank of Rajasthan and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... is claimed, civil court will have jurisdiction. three judges bench of hon'ble apex court in case of rajasthan state road transport corporation & anr. v/s. bal mukund bairwa (2) [(2009) 4 scc299 has observed that the question of jurisdiction is to be addressed, having regard to the facts of the case and ..... settlement. despite such a situation, the appellant has ventilated his grievances against the impugned action of the respondent which emanated from bipartite settlement in terms of act of 1947. hon'ble apex court in the premier automobiles ltd.(supra) examined the issue relating to jurisdiction of civil court in relation to industrial disputes ..... governed by bipartite settlement dated 17th november, 1980, which was arrived at between union of bank employees and the 6 management, in terms of provisions of act of 1947. in that background, the order, whereby appellant was debarred from participating in the process for promotion/recruitment, the embargo envisaged under the bipartite settlement .....

Akhilesh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2205; RLW2009(1)Raj746

..... case depends on circumstantial evidence. but in circumstantial evidence also when the facts are clear it is immaterial that no motive has been proved. men do not act wholly without motive. failure to discover the motive of the offence does not signify the non-existence of the crime. the failure to discover motive by appropriate ..... of maharashtra : 1992crilj1545 , has held that in circumstantial evidence also when the facts are clear it is immaterial that no motive has been proved. men do not act wholly without motive. failure to discover the motive of the offence does not signify the non-existence of the crime. the failure to discover motive by appropriate clinching ..... within the definition of 'dowry' and cannot be construed as demand of dowry within the definition of 'dowry' as defined under the provisions of the dowry prohibition act. he further contended that there is allegation about mortgage of kisan vikas patra which were in the name of deceased kavita and demand of four lac rupees by .....

Sharvan Lal and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2(2006)DMC534

..... clause of section 107, ipc and not clause secondly and thirdly. in paras 14 and 15 it has been held as under:14. it is beyond doubt that seema did commit suicide. undisputedly, such suicide has been committed within a year of the date of marriage. what happened on the date of occurrence is very material for ..... the evidence their lordships in paras 20 and 21 have held as under:20. instigation is to goad, urge forward, provoke, incite or encourage to do 'an act'. to satisfy the requirement of instigation though it is not necessary that actual words must be used to that effect or what constitutes instigation must necessarily and specifically be suggestive ..... by the appellants. as their lordships in ramesh kumar's case (supra) in paras 20 and 21 have laid down the exception where the accused persons by their acts, omissions and commissions and by continued course of conduct created such circumstances that deceased is left with no other option except to commit suicide. a case of instigation may .....

Suresh Chand and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : II(2001)DMC17; 2001(4)WLC684; 2001(4)WLN642

..... facts and circumstances of this case. in hajuri's case (supra), the proceedings before the high court did arise out of sections 6 and 7 of the orissa estates abolition act, 1961 and the matter under section 8 was pending elsewhere. it was under these circumstances held by their lordships of the supreme court that high court was wholly unjustified to ..... this court is not in a position to hear the appeal of an accused within a reasonable period of time, the court should ordinarily, unless there are cogent grounds for acting otherwise, release the accused on bail in cases where special leave has been granted to the accused to appeal against his conviction and sentence.'14. case of babu singh (supra .....

Govind Kalwani Vs. Raj.High Court, Jodhpur and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... examinations. in the peculiar circumstances of the case before such unending trial could get converted itself into a permanent menace, the answering respondents had to act and had acted to hold the credibility of the entire institution. the petitioner has provided for all the reasons and circumstances leading to the satisfaction of the answering ..... (2), to drop the enquiry and to dismiss the petitioner from service. the petitioner as an employee of the high court has committed serious misconduct. the act of misconduct, prima facie established, had scandalized the administration of justice in the state of rajasthan. the hon'ble judge, after a discreet enquiry conducted by ..... on your part was not proper and thus you transgressed all limits of decency, failed to maintain the dignity and respect towards the judiciary. this conduct and act of yours besides being unbecoming of an officer amounts to gross misconduct. statement of charge no.2 that you shri kalwani while posted & functioning as stated .....

Rockwood Hotels and Resorts Ltd Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... law.24. we do not find any lack of authority nor any prohibition in {17} dbsaw nos.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 the land revenue act or uit act which may prohibit or any statutory provision which may have restrained the state government to constitute a committee of senior officers, who had already submitted its report, confirming ..... passed by the authority concerned, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in conformity with the provisions of section 91-a and 92-b of the act of 1959. he further held that the court cannot sit in appeal over the administrative decisions taken by the competent authorities for removing encroachments upon the government land ..... the petitioner, have resulted into gross violation of {6} dbsaw nos.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 law. he held that under section 91-a of the act of 1959, the uit is competent to direct, in addition to the prosecution lodged for such violation, demolition of the constructions by the owner thereof, carried out in .....

Hilton Granite Ltd Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... law.24. we do not find any lack of authority nor any prohibition in {17} dbsaw nos.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 the land revenue act or uit act which may prohibit or any statutory provision which may have restrained the state government to constitute a committee of senior officers, who had already submitted its report, confirming ..... passed by the authority concerned, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in conformity with the provisions of section 91-a and 92-b of the act of 1959. he further held that the court cannot sit in appeal over the administrative decisions taken by the competent authorities for removing encroachments upon the government land ..... the petitioner, have resulted into gross violation of {6} dbsaw nos.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 law. he held that under section 91-a of the act of 1959, the uit is competent to direct, in addition to the prosecution lodged for such violation, demolition of the constructions by the owner thereof, carried out in .....

Rockwood Hotels and Resorts Ltd Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... law.24. we do not find any lack of authority nor any prohibition in {17} dbsaw nos.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 the land revenue act or uit act which may prohibit or any statutory provision which may have restrained the state government to constitute a committee of senior officers, who had already submitted its report, confirming ..... passed by the authority concerned, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in conformity with the provisions of section 91-a and 92-b of the act of 1959. he further held that the court cannot sit in appeal over the administrative decisions taken by the competent authorities for removing encroachments upon the government land ..... the petitioner, have resulted into gross violation of {6} dbsaw nos.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 law. he held that under section 91-a of the act of 1959, the uit is competent to direct, in addition to the prosecution lodged for such violation, demolition of the constructions by the owner thereof, carried out in .....