Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 55 punishments otherwise than by force court Court: karnataka Page 4 of about 1,046 results (0.142 seconds)

Dec 17 2003 (HC)

Yuvaraja Srikantadatta Narasimharaja Wodeyar Vs. N.V. Mahadevappa (Dec ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR1492; 2004(2)KarLJ553

..... it has to be held that the lower appellate court has committed an error in not following the legal principles and further committed an error in holding that the act of a secretary binds the trustees and beneficiary. therefore, the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court are required to be set aside by holding that the ..... court to consider the point urged by the learned counsel for the appellant as the same will not arise for consideration of this court. by holding that the act of palegar and alasingachar receiving the sale consideration from the plaintiff does not bind either the 1st defendant or the 2nd defendant, this court has to see whether ..... of civil judge, mysore against the purchasers of the adjacent property as well as the 1st defendant-trust. therefore, it was contended due to his fraudulent and dishonest act, plaintiff is not entitled to claim the equitable relief. it is also contended that the plaintiff has not claimed for refund of the money and that the relief sought .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2015 (HC)

N.H. Shivamurthy and Others Vs. Mark Gomez and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... of paragraph 7 of the said decision is relevant and same is extracted hereinbelow: 7. ..the position has changed after amendment of the code of civil procedure by the amendment act of 1976. now, under the amended provisions, all questions, including right, title, interests in the property arising between the parties to the proceedings under rule 97, have to be adjudicated ..... is always on the propounder of the will to prove the same to the satisfaction of the court in terms of under section 63 of indian succession act and section 68 of indian evidence act. 29. in the light of authoritative pronouncement of the decisions rendered in sameer singh's case and brahmdeo chaudhary's case, the approach adopted by the executing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 2015 (HC)

M. Pitchaiah and Others Vs. K.S. Periyaswamy, Advocate

Court : Karnataka

..... were responsible for the conduct of the business of the company. (iii) vicarious liability can be inferred against a company registered or incorporated under the companies act, 1956 only if the requisite statements, which are required to be averred in the complaint/petition, are made so as to make the accused therein vicariously ..... . learned magistrate/special court (economic offences) bengaluru, after recording sworn statement of the complainant, has taken cognizance for the offence punishable under section 447 of the act of 2013 and issued summons. 4. sri. k. g. raghavan, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that on bare perusal of the complaint, it ..... the president of india is a major share holder holding 54.03% equity shares by investing public money. he appoints the board of directors under the companies act, articles of association and memorandum of association of beml ltd. company (for short company') the board of directors of the company recommended 25% of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2004 (HC)

Boby Mathew Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3003; 2004(5)KarLJ415

..... suppression of material evidence and hence it is contended that the alleged recoveries or discovery of fact at the instance of the accused under section 27 of the indian evidence act is unacceptable.19. commenting upon the probabilities based on the prosecution evidence, it is contended that as is apparent from the evidence both the accused and the deceased were strong ..... based upon such other material irrespective of the fact as to whether motive is established or not'.29. it is to be noted that motive for a crime is an act of mind and cannot be fathomed like any other physical evidence. basically the motive would be known only to the deceased and more specifically to the accused. the deceased is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1997 (HC)

Prof. Babu Mathew and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1998]94CompCas784(Kar)

..... per share while directing the transfer of shares to the employees. the decision relates to the legislative intent of the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985, and the scheme was framed in exercise of jurisdiction under article 142 of the constitution. the facts, circumstances and the questions involved in that ..... . there is no alteration in the conditions of service of the employees nor any threat to their employment on account of such disinvestment. the act of disinvestment does not affect the interests of the employees nor does it have the effect of adversely affecting the conditions of service at present ..... . shares were not offered togeneral public or employees]. shares are offered to companies, banks, institutions, mutualfunds, brokers, or any other legal entities or persons acting individually orjointly, who are permitted to buy shares in india (including foreigninstitutional investors permitted by the sebi). the range of purchasers isbroad-based. (c) shares .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2015 (HC)

Maha Ganapati Shankara Devasthana, Sirsi and Others Vs. State of Karna ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... as a religious denomination within the meaning of article 26 of constitution of india and accordingly to declare that karnataka hindu religious institutions and charitable endowments (amendment) act 2011 (karnataka act 27 of 2011) and rules 2002, can have no application to hindus and their right to establish, manage and administer their own religious charitable institutions; c) ..... considered the law laid down by the apex court with regard to the interpretation of article 25 and 26 of the constitution of india in the following decisions: (1) bal patil and another vs. union of india, air 2005 sc 3172, (2) dr. ramesh yeshwant prabhoo v. prabhakar kashinath kunte, air 1966 sc 1113, (3) ..... (5) dr. ramesh yeshwant prabhoo v. prabhakar kashinath kunte, air 1966 sc 1113, (6) pannalal bansilal vs. state of andhra pradesh, air 1996 sc 1023, (7) bal patil and another vs. union of india, air 2005 sc 3172, and (8) m.p. gopalakrishnan nair vs. state of kerala, air 2005 sc 3053. the contention of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2005 (HC)

The Hatti Gold Mines Limited, Represented by Its Managing Director Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2005Kant264; 2005(2)ARBLR528(Kar); ILR2005KAR1777; 2005(3)KarLJ502

..... , the applicant is entitled to deduct the time taken in getting the certified copy or other required documents from the court.27. under section 43 of the act, the limitation act 1963 is made applicable to arbitrations as it applies to proceedings in court. the kerala high court in anas abdul khadeer v. abdul nasar, 2001(2) ..... agreement would be valid. if such a contract is clear, unambiguous and explicit and not vague, it is not hit by sections 23 and 28 of the contract act. this cannot be understood as parties contracting against the statute. mercantile law and practice permit such agreements'. thus there cannot be any doubt that when the parties agree ..... to the facts and circumstances of this case.5. the learned counsel appearing for the appellant cited several judgments mainly to contend that section 14 of the limitation act. is applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case and under the said provision the period during which the proceeding was pending before the wrong court could .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 2009 (HC)

Shrimathi W/O Ramesh Nayak Vs. Renuka W/O Late Bharat Bhushan

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2010CriLJ372; 2010(1)KarLJ197; 2009(6)AIRKarR394

..... the above observations of the hon'ble supreme court, i am of the considered view that the presumption under section 139 of n.i. act extends only to the issuing of cheque towards discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability and it has to be raised only after the complainant establishes that ..... principles of legal jurisprudence, namely presumption of innocence as human rights and the doctrine of reverse burden introduced by section 139 should be delicately balanced. such balancing acts, indisputably would largely depend upon the factual matrix of each case., the materials brought on record and having regard to legal principles governing the same.19. following ..... or other liability' means a legally enforceable debt or other liability.13. a careful reading of the above provisions of section 138 and 139 of n.i. act it is clear that in order to raise the presumption under section 139, the complainant has to establish the fact that 'he received the cheque' in question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2023 (HC)

Shri. Yuvaraj Nimbalkar, Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... that sister of accused no.1 by name triveni belonging to hindu maratha community married one vinod malali of hindu raddy community on 12.05.2020 under the special marriage act and got registered the same with the sub-registrar, gangavathi. being enraged with inter caste marriage, accused no.1 who is the brother of triveni gave an offer (supari) to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2015 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Vs. M./S Karnataka State

Court : Karnataka

..... supra) wherein it is held that: flow directly to for implementation of the material on record shows that the very purpose of constitution of the assessee was to act as a nodal agency for implementation of mega-city scheme worked out by the planning commission. both the central and the state governments are expected to provide requisite finances ..... fixed deposits till the utilization period has to be treated as the amount capitalized and is not an income to bring in within the tax net under the act.9. after hearing the rival contentions and perusing the material on record, we have noticed that the assessee company is a government owned company. in order to ..... establishment. no part of the funds shall be utilised by kappec for kappec shall prepare viable and 4 farmers in while utilizing the funds kappec shall follow ktpp act the kappec shall make sure that utilization of funds increasing the export of their 7. shall benefit horticultural produce for getting better returns.8. and other procedures .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //